Re: Taxiing before first flight. (long editorial)
Sam Hoskins <shoskins@...>
My two cents worth, where I disagree with my good friend, Jim.
1. I do use differential finger brakes, with great success. They are positioned right behind the throttle. I let go of the throttle to use the brakes. You can see my installation here: http://home.mchsi.com/~shoskins/brakes01.jpg 2. I do have rudder splitters. See the installation here: http://home.mchsi.com/%7Eshoskins/aircraftdetail/tailcone01.jpg Each cable, splitting off to the rudder bellcrank, has a turnbuckle for adjustment. 3. I do not have the intermediate bellcrank. I believe the single biggest ground handling improvement that can be made is correcting the wheel alignment, per Gall. I made a blog entry about it: http://samhoskins.blogspot.com/ Having said that, I think it's fine for people to install the 6-pack. A couple of years ago I had the opportunity to taxi Jim's plane. I thought it felt a lot like mine, though maybe a little "softer" on the rudder pedals due to the tail wheel cable springs. (I bought a set, but never got around to installing them). Jim's point is well taken, if you build like a successful model, you should have the same results as that plane. However, "tame" is a word that is not in my Quickie vocabularly. Sam Hoskins Murpysburger, IL _____ From: Q-LIST@... [mailto:Q-LIST@...] On Behalf Of Jim Patillo Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:33 PM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: [Q-LIST] Taxiing before first flight. (long editorial) Fellas, I had the opportunity to high speed taxi Wes Isbergs' Q200 Saturday before his first flight and would like to share some info. Even though he did a fair job of controlling the plane down the runway, I found it very difficult to handle. I could not keep it straight either with rudder or his braking system or the combination. Wind was about 12K - 10-15 degrees off the nose. (Note: he has no bellcrank but has split the cables internally to rudder and tail wheel and has a modified dual differential finger brake system). Guess he didn't buy the Jim/Bob Six Pack Mod concept. My immediate response to him was to park the plane before he got hurt and fix the problem! Now for the details. With just splitting the cables, Wes has no way to differentiate (detune)the angle of the tail wheel from the rudder. He's installed a modified dual finger brake that has a single stick that slides sideways to apply pressure to one master cylinder or the other or both. That is not good because its way to sensitive and hard to get positive results from known inputs. Further exacerabating the situation is his hand is on the brake and not the throttle when taking off or landing. Not a good thing! How many serious tail draggers have anything other than toe brakes or heel brakes? Its just not natural to have finger brakes on a tail dragger and is to dangerous in my opinion. There are way to many things going on to be doing this additional "dance". This leads me to a conclusion. The Q's with sixpack mods installed are really quite tame, ask anyone who has them. I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone would want to do anything different. Yet we see it all the time. Most new Q pilots have a very difficult time handling their planes initially and often crack them up or have an incident even before the first flight. Because you didn't invent it, doesn't mean you can't copy it! The situation with Wes; here's a very intellignet fella sitting on a field with sucessuful Q's all around, yet he chooses to do his own thing. Why? To much additional cost? To much additional labor? Doesn't have a clear undrstanding of the problem? Doesn't know how to fix it - NOT! What? I do not understand this. This leads me to another conclusion. If Wes, sitting in the middle of LVK with sucessful planes all aroud, chooses to go a different route, what does that tell you about builders working on their own, isolated and out of touch? I now understand why this is not so simple and brace yourself fellas, we're in for more! These comments are in no way intended to bring heat on Wes but to simply make a couple of points as to why Q pilots are still smacking up their planes. Hopefully this turns on the lights for someoen who don't want to get hurt. Regards, Jim Patillo N46JP Q200 800 hours in type. So far, even in severe crosswinds, this plane has never deviated from the center line. Bingo! There's a reason.
|
|