Re: LS1 Foam Layout. . .
Rick Hole
Yes, you are correct that the shape of the wing is altered doing this, but the core templates are shaped to compensate.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: dan@... [mailto:dan@...] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 10:51 AM To: r.hole@...; Q-LIST@... Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] LS1 Foam Layout. . . This is a response to Rick Hole's OFFLIST message (Show below). Rick if you send an e-mail to Q-LIST_at_yahoogroups_dot_com it will be posted to the Q-list automagically. ;-) Thanks Rick, The problem is that the LS1 plans aren't very precise. They seem to be an addendum to an addendum, with various references to the Q2 plans. The Q2 plans say that you line the T.E. of the templates to the Squared off foam block, but it also says that you can leave the trim lines dangling off the end of the foam if you want. So that leaves some wiggle room fore and aft. Then it doesn't really say how to align the templates vertically from end to end. Except an obscure reference to "Water Lines" in the Education Chapter (3). There are no offsets or exceptions listed on the templates, and no vertical dimensions given. Just a rough sketch of the GU canard templates tacked to the ends of the foam, with no precise locations given. If the templates cut the foam perpendicular to the wing, and then the wing is swept back, and anhedral is added, doesn't this change the shape of the airfoil to the relative wind (Along BL0). I know that the templates seem to have worked fine for many of you, and they resulted in several beautifully flying airplanes. I'm just wondering how people actually cut out their canards, and get my head wrapped around it. I'd like to write an article that makes the process a little more precise than shown in the "instructions." I appreciate your input. Thanks again, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:27:26 -0400, Rick Hole wrote: Hi Dan,
|
|