Re: Q2 to to Q200
|
Martin Skiby
Good advice Jay,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----------------------------------------- From: "Jay Scheevel"To: main@Q-List.groups.io Cc: Sent: Wednesday February 26 2020 8:37:47AM Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 to to Q200 Also, if using the GU, especially with the heavier engine, you will need to fit the canard with vortex generators to avoid contamination related lift degradation.
Cheers, Jay Scheevel, N8WQ
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Martin Skiby
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 9:31 AM To: 'main@Q-List.groups.io' <main@Q-List.groups.io> Cc: 'main@q-list.groups.io' <main@q-list.groups.io> Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 to to Q200
Yes what Richard said. No need for an LS Canard. But there is a need to counter balance all control surfaces if not already done.
----------------------------------------- From: "Richard Kaczmarek 3RD" 1. New engine mounts 2. A modification to the firewall 3. A longer cowling Some will argue that is you don't have the LS1 canard you need to have it but but that just isn't true.
Richard |
|
|