Re: Elevator pitch trim installed and tested
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I flew for 15 months without this and had no problems. I just decided to put one in after I started loading my plane more aft and wanted to see over the nose when landing (and not bounce the tail on the runway). My rear wing has 1.5 degrees nose down relative to plans, so it already tends to fly tail low when slow. You should not need additional trim if you have the reflexor installed. I had no problem getting mine trimmed for landing with just the reflexor. My trim routine is more complicated now, but I don’t think you want to complicate things on your first flights.
main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Tuesday, March 17, 2020 3:01 PMTo:
Re: [Q-List] Elevator pitch trim installed and tested
I thought you suggested I didnt need an elevator trim ? :-0
On 17/03/2020 17:21, Jay Scheevel wrote:
Thanks David! I almost knew that I would hear from you first. 😊 I take your quick response to be a compliment…of sorts. I was limited with respect to space, so the compler-kation factor went up to accommodate. Thanks for your comments.
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of David J. Gall
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Elevator pitch trim installed and tested
I’m laughing out loud as I’m writing this: Did you previously design suspension systems for the BMW motorcar company? That’s the most compler-kated way I could imagine to do that — and yet, it precisely meets requirements. Amazing! 😉
Keep your spring forces as light as possible — it sounds like you’re already there — and keep your spring rates as low as possible by using the longest springs that’ll fit — again, it looks like you’re already there. So, bravo on getting the important variables dialed in, but your overkill factor is ... large. 🤷♂️ 😂
Keep up the good work!
Join main@Q-List.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.