Re: original canard airfoil & VG's vs using the NASA LS(1)-0417 MOD
L Koutz <koutzl@...>
Doug
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
There is nothing wrong with the Gu25 WITH VG's. It is a cheap and easy fix to loss of laminar flow that occcurs with any debris on the canard. From my viewpoint you either have the VG's or you are going to scare yourself -REALLY BAD sometime or other flying with that wing. There is nothing sacred with placement. I have seen the VG's several places, different spacing, size etc. Some people are discussing that subject. And there is a "recommended" place for them. But these planes ARE called Experimental so adventuresome individuals try different placements. Nuff said, but just my opinion ( and 15 years of listening) as I don't own one and have never flown one. The LS-1 is different. It does not need VG's to fly OK. But I am trying to fix a problem that most drivers don't even know they have. In my plane there is a loss of lift from the top of the elevator when the elevator goes down even the least little bit. I figure if I can get the lift back I can land slower, and GOD knows we could use a plane that lands slower. Plane flys OK but I want more. It's not a problem. It's just that a few of us want to know how the airflow is traveling over the canard and don't really know how to figure it out and really all the canards are similar but not EXACTLY the same so everyone's flows are slightly different. Anyway, it is not a PROBLEM. We are just trying to figure airflow out for optimum speed. We are Experimenting! Just my thoughts. Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Fortune" <pentam@...> To: <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 10:20 PM Subject: [Q-LIST] original canard airfoil & VG's vs using the NASA LS(1)-0417 MOD A newbie question:
|
|