Re: Tri-Q vs QAC Belly Boards
Jerry Marstall <jnmarstall@...>
My 2-cents. Manual is faster to deploy and bring up.. No needed for incremental use ( no notches in lever). It's either full up or full down.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Jerry -------- Original message -------- From: Richard Thomson <richard@...> Date: 12/13/20 5:09 AM (GMT-05:00) To: main@Q-List.groups.io Subject: Re: [Q-List] Tri-Q vs QAC Belly Boards Good idea Richard, Van's flap motor. gives more options. Thanks.
Rich T. On 12/12/2020 20:54, Richard Kaczmarek
3RD wrote:
From my personal experience of having flown both I prefer the TriQ brake over the forward belly board. The placement does not cause the pitch change that we experienced with Doug's old Q2. We turned our original TriQ board around from the original rear hinge to the front due to seeing it flutter in flight. With the hinge on the front side we no longer ended up with exhaust smells in the cockpit during landings and the plane experienced an overall speed increase (door no longer grabbing air in the fludder) it can also handle being on a servo with a front hinge or even the Van's flap motor so you can see the degrees of deployment. |
|