Re: Q1 Fuselage comes up
Eugen,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Everyone is right about the sharp corners and the cloth wrapping them. Guidelines on how much rounding of the corners is needed can be found here: http://n8wq.scheevel.com/documents/RAF_composite_education_section_from_Q2Pl ans.pdf Also, the best way to round the corners in a very smooth way is to use a spare piece of the foam as a sanding block. The foam will grind away on both the block and the piece you are sanding and make a very nice curve (lots of foam dust, so have a vacuum cleaner on hand). Cheers, Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Rob de Bie Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 6:06 AM To: main@Q-List.groups.io Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q1 Fuselage comes up Very nice work indeed!! But I agree with Keith: the sharp corners are far from optimal. Your light vacuum will make sure that the glass fiber cloth will conform, so that's not the problem. But if you have a multiple ply laminate laid over a small radius, you will get high out-of-plane stresses if a bending moment is applied. Now whether there is a lot of bending moment in the fuselage skins, I don't know, they are probably secondary effects. But I would nevertheless increase the radius quite a bit. As an example of out-of-plane stresses: imagine laminating a 90 angle with 10 cm / 4 inch legs, with 3 or 4 layers. If you would bend it so the angle gets smaller, the out-of-plane stresses will push the laminate plies against each other - no problem. But if you bend it so the angle gets bigger, the sign changes, and the out-of-plane stresses want to delaminate. Now do this same experiment with different radii, and you will see that the larger the radius, the stronger the specimen will be. Rob On 30 Mar 2021 13:43, Keith Welsh wrote: Hi Eugen,cloth likes rounded edges. It doesn't like making sharp turns. The only places I remember havingsharp turns is where glass tapes were used for bulkheads and micro was used in the corners.:-))
|
|