..BOTH Wing and Canard were intended to be 240". One of each were
built. The main wing failed the load test, possibly due to the test
fixture. the canard passed. I built a 200" canard per his
instructions and load tested at the same time as the others. I
istalled this canard and flew it over 100Hrs before I sold the plane.
I would take a "tested, but broken" canard any day over the
unknown.....my butt is worth a little more than that. This is not
something you should do half-heartedly. (I'm sure some won't like
this.) Mike Conlin

--- In Q-LIST@y..., The Bruce Crains <jcrain2@j...> wrote:

I believe that both airfoils were meant to be the same length.

Somebody

spank me if I'm wrong!!!
Bruce Crain

On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:25:30 EST BD5ER@a... writes:

In a message dated 1/20/02 8:22:17 PM Mountain Standard Time,
rryan@s... writes:

Would you have to increase the span of the rear wing to 240"

also?

Ryan

I would suspect that you could if you wanted to but Mr.
Waddelow
apparently chose to keep the same main wing span - with a

slightly

different
lay-up schedule. I'm sure there are weight/ballance issues

either

way.
Caveat Emptor.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Think outside the box......Fly in the envelope

Leon McAtee
Q-2/turbo VW Rabbit GTI/G-60
Q-1/????????????????