Re: Quickie q2 C-GMBK
David Komaike <dkomaike@...>
Here's a link to the Calgary paper
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Albertan+doing+fine+after+plane+crash/4933327/story.html
--- On Mon, 6/13/11, dan@quickheads.com <dan@quickheads.com> wrote:
From: dan@quickheads.com <dan@quickheads.com> Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Quickie Q2 C-GMBK To: Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com Received: Monday, June 13, 2011, 8:09 PM Rene, I removed the ad. Please let me know if you have any feedback about the classified ads. (and you're welcome.) There have been a couple of recent incidents of first time flyers crashing their newly purchased Q's on first flight, and I intend to write an article about this in the next newsletter. If anyone has some suggestions about how to smack some sense into some of the low time pilots, with more money (or credit) than skill, please contact me offlist. As the Q-munity gets a little older, I think we'll see more planes up for sale, and lots of them being snapped up by younger folks interested in this "cool" looking design. I'm all for handing out Darwin Awards, (hey it makes the gene pool stronger), but I'm concerned about giving an even worse reputation to a good design. Let me know what you all think. Warm regards, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:47:48 -0700, Pat Panzera wrote: I listened to EAA President Rod Hightower speak on Thursday night. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Q1 Appraisal?
Pat Panzera <panzera@...>
IMHO, Barnstormers should do the trick.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:18 PM, <dan@quickheads.com> wrote:
Someone in the QBA forums is interested in selling a Q1 for a small air
|
|
Re: Quickie q2 C-GMBK
If/when the time comes for me to retire "*Plastic Explosive*", I guess I'll
just have to donate it to a museum. Here are my likely pilot qualifications for a buyer. - Must be an A&P or have scratch-built at least one high performance aircraft and test flown it through the first 40 hours. - Must be very familiar with aircraft electronics and be capable of interpreting a schematic. - Be familiar with fuel injection systems. - Must have 200 hours of high performance taildragger time, 30 hours of which must be in the last 6 months. - Must be under 50 years of age. - Additional points if you're single with no dependents. Sam On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, <dan@quickheads.com> wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Q1 Appraisal?
quickheads
Someone in the QBA forums is interested in selling a Q1 for a small air museum in CA. Can you guys check it out and see if my answer was good enough and perhaps chime in with a better answer?
http://www.quickheads.com/14-q1-forum/1128-help-with-valuation-of-q1-for-a-non-profit-org.html Thanks, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com
|
|
Re: Quickie q2 C-GMBK
quickheads
Rene,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I removed the ad. Please let me know if you have any feedback about the classified ads. (and you're welcome.) There have been a couple of recent incidents of first time flyers crashing their newly purchased Q's on first flight, and I intend to write an article about this in the next newsletter. If anyone has some suggestions about how to smack some sense into some of the low time pilots, with more money (or credit) than skill, please contact me offlist. As the Q-munity gets a little older, I think we'll see more planes up for sale, and lots of them being snapped up by younger folks interested in this "cool" looking design. I'm all for handing out Darwin Awards, (hey it makes the gene pool stronger), but I'm concerned about giving an even worse reputation to a good design. Let me know what you all think. Warm regards, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:47:48 -0700, Pat Panzera wrote:
I listened to EAA President Rod Hightower speak on Thursday night.
|
|
Re: Quickie q2 C-GMBK
We have a terrible record for transferring ownership, especially the
taildraggers. Sam On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Pat Panzera < panzera@experimental-aviation.com> wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Quickie q2 C-GMBK
Pat Panzera <panzera@...>
I listened to EAA President Rod Hightower speak on Thursday night.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
One of his topics was how the FAA is trying to clean up the safety issues concerning aviation. One such issue he mentioned was the new owner of a homebuilt and how high the accident rate is with these individuals. Another high number of accidents is generated through war birds, and the builder of a new homebuilt right at the 50 hour mark. Pat
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Rene Robertson <q2robertson@yahoo.ca> wrote:
Hi All,
|
|
Quickie q2 C-GMBK
Rene Robertson <q2robertson@...>
Hi All,
I'm very sad to report that Dr. Steve's Q2 C-GMBK was involved in an accident this past Friday, June 10, 2010. The new owner was attempting to fly from Abbotsford throught the Rockies to his home base in Alberta. He tried to land on the highway in the rockies near Field, BC. I still don't know all the details and will not speculate on what happened at this point in time. The new owner has non life threatening head injuries and is recovering in hospital. He will be ok. Rene Q2 C-GTCA [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Quickie q2 C-GMBK
Rene Robertson <q2robertson@...>
Hi Dan,
Thanks for running the ad all this time. Could you please delete it since MBK is no longer available. Thanks Rene [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: B-17 Crash. . .
David Komaike <dkomaike@...>
Here's one a little closer to home. I've been told that this was a Quickie. Anyone have any update on who it was or what happened?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2011/06/10/plane-crash-lands-on-bc-highway
--- On Mon, 6/13/11, dan@quickheads.com <dan@quickheads.com> wrote:
From: dan@quickheads.com <dan@quickheads.com> Subject: [Q-LIST] B-17 Crash. . . To: Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com Received: Monday, June 13, 2011, 6:30 PM This is VERY sad, but I'm glad everyone got out OK! http://tinyurl.com/5s52qcg Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
B-17 Crash. . .
quickheads
This is VERY sad, but I'm glad everyone got out OK!
http://tinyurl.com/5s52qcg Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com
|
|
Re: New Video!!
quickheads
You rock! Great video, thanks so much Brucie!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-Danny Boy
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:08:02 GMT, jcrain2@juno.com wrote:
OK Dan!Mr. Magoo has dood it again! I uploaded my "Angel Fire Flight"
|
|
Re: CS prop on Q2?
Martin Skiby
This is a good question. I will shoot him an e-mail and see. I just assumed that he would make them for all sizes.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com, "Jim P" <logistics_engineering@...> wrote:
|
|
Motors for Q1's
Martin Burns
There is new 4 stroke 35 HP engine from Czechoslovakia which looks very
good for the Q1. It is very light at only about 60 lb, but fairly expensive at about 3000 Euros. See: http://www.vernermotor.com/index.asp?sec=41 Martin Burns G-BKSE Q1 Scotland ________________________________ From: Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of fg13fg Sent: 11 June 2011 20:30 To: Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Q-LIST] Subaru motors for Q1's For all you Q1 guys out there, here is another motor option I ran across with potential, when one likes to keep similar to the Onan setup. Very nice motors! http://robinamerica.com/pfeatures.aspx?pid=225 Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------- This email has been scanned by the MxScan Email Security System. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------
|
|
Re: New Video!!
OK Dan!Mr. Magoo has dood it again! I uploaded my "Angel Fire Flight" to Quick Heads web site. It was easy 'cause I followed the instructions! Duh! Am soo proud o' mah sef'!Bruce Crain
____________________________________________________________ Groupon™ Official Site 1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Get 50-90% off your city's best! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4df41193b9d6636fdfast06vuc
|
|
Subaru motors for Q1's
fg13fg <fg13fg@...>
For all you Q1 guys out there, here is another motor option I ran across with potential, when one likes to keep similar to the Onan setup.
Very nice motors! http://robinamerica.com/pfeatures.aspx?pid=225 Jason
|
|
Re: CS prop on Q2?
Martin,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I didn't think Gary was making props for the 0200. Last I heard it was only for the LYC. Alan Thayer got a new one the other day for his Long EZE and it really looked nice. Regards, Off to Golden West in Marysville for the EAA fly in. Jim Patillo N46JP
--- In Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com, "Martin" <mskiby@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CS prop on Q2?
Martin Skiby
I would agree. Also Prince has done a pretty good job. One that I will be trying is the silver bullet from Gary Hertzler. It is a very low drag prop that gives great climb as well as cruise performance.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com, Sam Hoskins <sam.hoskins@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Epoxy
Martin Skiby
I am using EZ Poxy, but you can also use the Aero Poxy as well they are both a high strength structural bond. West should only be used for non structural and fill applications. It does not have a high enough stress rating to be used in a structure layup. This is per the Rutan aircraft factory.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com, epadams@... wrote:
|
|
Re: Epoxy
Rick Hole
West is great for non-structural components. I would not build wings,
control surfaces, etc. with it. EZ Poxy is equal to Safety-poxy, time tested, and only a health problem if you are a rat in California :-) Rick Hole N1711Q Q200 panel in final assembly, looking good
|
|