Re: FOAM-joint-failure-discussion
Looks like my picture did not work when pasted in the body of the note, so here it is as an attachment.
Jay
|
|
FOAM-joint-failure-discussion
Hi Rob,
I think we have convinced Uzair to do the right thing, but to clarify my point about the vulnerability of horizontal joints versus vertical, I add the following clarification. For a cantilever beam, let's consider vertical versus horizontal potential shear failure planes (the bonded laminations under discussion). In brittle materials, such as styrofoam, the region where the compressive principle stress orientation is oriented 25-35 degrees to the joint is where shear failure of that joint is most likely. The maximum length of a the joint surface that could fail is limited to the length that lies within that region and where sufficient differential stress exists. The picture below shows the stress trajectories in a flexed cantilever beam (such as a wing). The solid orange lines are the max compressive stress and the dashed are the min compressive (tensile) stress. In the upper blue region, the stress orientations are optimal for vertical joints to shear. The short green line is the largest extent of a vertical joint that will fit into this region. In the lower blue area, the stresses are oriented to favor shear failure of a horizontal joint. The green line there is the longest horizontal joint that is favorably oriented to shear in this region. My original point is that in a long thin beam, such as a wing, a horizontal joint has more potential to shear catastrophically than a vertical joint does, thus making failure of a horizontal joint the more critical issue. Cheers, Jay
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Sky Hawk
@Jay- Al right, no more bonding plans, dropped that idea completely :)
On Thursday, February 9, 2017 11:37 PM, "Rob de Bie robdebie@... [Q-LIST]" wrote: I agree with the recommendation: stick to the plans.
However, I do not agree with your comments on a difference between vertical and horizontal bond lines when the foam is loaded in pure shear. The vertical and horizontal bond lines experience the same shear stress, and they would fail at a similar shear load. Therefore, pay a lot of attention to the vertical joints of the foam blocks. This does not affect the recommendation, but we should have our facts straight. Rob At 18:41 09 02 2017, you wrote: >I encourage you all of you NOT to encourage >Uzair to deviate from the plans in any way relative to the wing structure. > >Charlie's advice is spot on. Bonding foam >laminates together horizontally creates stress >concentrations and may cause the foam to fail >immediately adjacent to the bond line. The net >effect would be the same as stacking foam with >no bonding at all. Vertical butt joints between >foam core sections, as called for in the plans, >are perpendicular to shear loads, so are not >prone to failure from shear loads. > >Follow the plans for all wing construction >details. Small deviations from plans on the >wingtips are the only exception that will not impact the integrity of the wing. > >Cheers, >Jay Scheevel > >
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Rob de Bie
I agree with the recommendation: stick to the plans.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
However, I do not agree with your comments on a difference between vertical and horizontal bond lines when the foam is loaded in pure shear. The vertical and horizontal bond lines experience the same shear stress, and they would fail at a similar shear load. Therefore, pay a lot of attention to the vertical joints of the foam blocks. This does not affect the recommendation, but we should have our facts straight. Rob
At 18:41 09 02 2017, you wrote:
I encourage you all of you NOT to encourage
|
|
Re: FOAM
Uzair, The link below is what you are looking for, I do not know where you are located. If you have lakes around with docks you should be able to find a source. Start at your local lumber supply and ask if they can order it in for your dock. Regards, Charlie Johnson
On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Charlie oneskydog@... [Q-LIST] <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
I encourage you all of you NOT to encourage Uzair to deviate from the plans in any way relative to the wing structure.
Charlie's advice is spot on. Bonding foam laminates together horizontally creates stress concentrations and may cause the foam to fail immediately adjacent to the bond line. The net effect would be the same as stacking foam with no bonding at all. Vertical butt joints between foam core sections, as called for in the plans, are perpendicular to shear loads, so are not prone to failure from shear loads. Follow the plans for all wing construction details. Small deviations from plans on the wingtips are the only exception that will not impact the integrity of the wing. Cheers, Jay Scheevel
|
|
Re: FOAM
Rich, As a manufacturing engineer who has worked with pourable foam. In my opinion this method brings nothing to the table over the tried and true follow the plans methods and materials. Mockup engine blocks have a totally different set of specifications. Regards, Charlie Johnson
On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Armilite@... [Q-LIST] <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: FOAM
Rich Gillen
In the case of Bonding thin 2" Foam to make thicker Blocks for making Wings
is a Bad Idea!
But something maybe worth looking into is using Cheap 2 part Liquid Epoxy
Plastic that sets up at Room Temperature fairly quick, and even quicker with a
little Heat applied. It is impervious to Gas, some Foam isn't, is light weight
like Foam, Floats, is Colorable for many different Colors, can be Cast into
about any Shape and Hard Points can be Cast in, or Fuel Tanks, Storage, etc,
it's Sand able, Drillable, Glue able, etc! It does Expand when Mixed! Can be
shipped in Drums, and different size Containers.
So the only Bad is, it needs some form of Mold that is Held together by
Bolts or Clamps or Weight.
The Place I visited years ago that use's it extensively is Payr Products http://www.payr.com/ who Cast Engine
Blocks, Transmissions, etc., out of the Stuff. Now I'm 6ft 320lbs and they had a
Chevy Engine Small Block on a Engine stand, and I could stand on it. The guy
showed me how the two parts can be just poured into a bucket and let
sit, while we walked around the shop talking and came back maybe 30-40 minutes
later and it was setup hard in the Bucket! They use molds made of thin wall
Aluminum that just Clamp together, I don't remember the exact Pressure the Stuff
Expands at, but it was fairly low. They were light Weight Clamps like on a Tool
Box.
With CNC Routers fairly cheap today, even build able by the Home Guy,
many Plans out there, you could make your own Molds from Wood, or Aluminum, even
this Stuff can be used to make Molds for Fiberglass parts. It is Machine able
also.
IF, you have ever looked at the Plastic Patio Deck Hardware that even in a
2x4 Size Shape you can't break it very easy, it's very similar stuff, very
Strong, but very light Weight like Foam. So this stuff Cast and then wrapped in
Fiberglass or Carbon Fiber would be very Strong! Even Stronger than the Foam and
Fiberglass!
Just My 2 Cents!
Rich
In a message dated 2/8/2017 8:26:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
Q-LIST@... writes:
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Rob de Bie
Hi Uzair,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In theory you are right: a wing *could* be built from 2 inch thick foam bonded together to form an 8 inch thick foam block. If you use micro, the bond will be stronger than the foam itself. But it's the risk of having areas that are not well bonded, due to entraped air, not enough clamping pressure, thickness variations in the foam, and other mistakes. Let me give an example - see the attached pictures. I've supervised a number of design & build & test exercises at university. In the design of one group, balsa wood was used as the core of a sandwich beam. To achieve a desired core height, they had to bond no less than seven layers of end-grain balsa wood together. I addition, this end-grain balsa wood comes in matts of blocks of balsa, that are not glued together, so they had to glue that too. All in all the group had to do a lot of bonding / gluing to build a proper core. Their design failed *way* below the target load (maybe 10% of the target 1000 kg). It's always difficult to point out the starting point of the failure, but I'm sure it was a disbond somewhere in the core. All in all I would stay away from this solution. Keep the number of foam bonds to an absolute minimum. Rob
At 09:27 09 02 2017, you wrote:
Ok, that's resolved.
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Uzair, I understand you may have concerns not being a composites designer. The bottom line is that a Q built to the plans is a proven airframe flown within the envelope. Where people get in trouble most of the time is by altering the structure during the build thinking it will be ok, without a proper engineering review. Designing robust light structures is harder than it looks, follow the plans and the approved mods and you will have a safe airplane. Regards, Charlie Johnson Ogden, Ut
On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:27 AM, Uzair Khan uzair850@... [Q-LIST] <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Sky Hawk
Ok, that's resolved. Outboard and inboard in both wing and canard are also butt joined. Will that not be a problem at high speeds since they are also bonded. My queries might seem lame, but I am a newbie and trying to learn. :)
On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 8:31 PM, "Charlie oneskydog@... [Q-LIST]" wrote: Uzair, The core of a sandwich beam transmits the shear loads from the bottom (tension) side to the top(compression) of the beam. Discontinuities in the shear web concentrate loads like bond lines that are stiffer than the foam. Shear is the highest at the center of the beam. Trying to bond thin sheets together will not produce a sound structure. As others have noted documented deaths occurred by trying this. Shear loads are real. Regards, Charlie Johnson
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Uzair, The core of a sandwich beam transmits the shear loads from the bottom (tension) side to the top(compression) of the beam. Discontinuities in the shear web concentrate loads like bond lines that are stiffer than the foam. Shear is the highest at the center of the beam. Trying to bond thin sheets together will not produce a sound structure. As others have noted documented deaths occurred by trying this. Shear loads are real. Regards, Charlie Johnson
On Feb 8, 2017, at 4:04 AM, michaelphilips77@... [Q-LIST] <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
No, no, no! Follow the plans. Early on there was a fatality in Canada where the builder did just what you are suggesting. He was doing a high speed fly-by and his wing came apart. Sam Sent via wireless Gizmo.
On Feb 8, 2017 7:15 AM, "michaelphilips77@... [Q-LIST]" <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Michael Philips
Sorry Mike, my bad.
In case of Q1, plans ask for 7" thick styrofoam for wings and canard. But I can easily acquire 2" thick styrofoam, with same density as being sold on aircraftspruce. Can I bond a few of them to get required thickness and hot wire them to make wings and canard? Structural strength comes fiberglass, so I think it might not matter. But any inputs on this is appreciated. Uzair
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Michael Philips
Sorry Mike, my bad.
In case of wing and canard for Q1, plans ask for 7" thick styrofoam. I can easily acquire 2" thick styrofoam with same density as being sold on aircraftspruce. Can I bond a few of them to get the required thickness and then hot wire to make wings and canard? The structural strength comes from fiberglass, so I think it might not matter. But any inputs on this can be helpful. Uzair
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Hi Uzair, You won't get any response from a non question. Tell us where you live, what you have flown, what airport are you near... Then ask a question! Check out my building web page on the Q200 website and the flying videos. Fly Safe,
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Uzair Khan uzair850@... [Q-LIST] <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Want to post queries
Norm Parmley <norm_parm@...>
Uzair, May I suggest this site as a great place too start. http://www.fastlittleairplanes.com/ Of course the Q-List forum is great to ask questions. Regards, Norm Parmley
From: "Uzair Khan uzair850@... [Q-LIST]" To: Q-LIST@... Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 9:42 AM Subject: [Q-LIST] Want to post queries Hi, I am a electronics cum software techie. But I have real love towards flying machines. Want to start with Q1. Have a lot of questions, which I want get clarified. Thanks, Uzair
|
|
Re: fastlittleairplanes.com
|
|
fastlittleairplanes.com
mylittlemgb@...
Just wanted to invite everyone to come and checkout the updated website for Fast Little Airplanes. As we continue to move forward we will continue to update photos and parts, and would love to hear what you think. The new shop is getting up on its feet and diversification did become required in order to move forward with the new kit and pay the bills. Wendy and I are still living on Spam and Raman noodles but we now get a chicken dinner on date night. At this time we are working on 350JD to get her back in the air by hopefully Sun N Fun. Once again this year we will be hosting the Sunshine Express 400 and a fun little challenge the day before called the Bootlegger Challenge you can check it out at www.sportairrace.org . Hope this has been a productive and blessed winter for all. Oh and before we forget our tenitive wedding date will be June 3rd 2017 at the Ona Airpark in Ona, WV. Richard & Wendy www.fastlittleairplanes.com
|
|
Demo Ride Request
Martin Skiby
I would like to see if we could bribe any Q200 drivers to come to KMIT on the 10th or 11th and provide my son and test pilot a ride in a Q200? He has 40+hrs in the TriQ and quite a bit tail wheel time, but would like to get a ride in a Q200 for the experience and looks for any advise while testing the Q200. Please let me know if anyone can make it over please, It is worth a meal of course, at least. Sincerely Martin Skiby
|
|