Re: Cheap Q2
Pat Weaver
Not the turbo Revmaster, in one of the discussions be said he was selling plans, manuals and other stuff for $500 and had another Revmaster motor for $50. May have been an oops, but that's what was posted
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 8:14 AM Patrick Panzera <editor@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Q-List] Cheap Q2 Here the Revmaster is $50
Gene Emmerich <gene.emmerich@...>
Cost $500, includes original manual. Revmaster engine available for $50. I have lots more. Everything is at KCNO (Chino airport)
Larry Severson 18242 Peters Ct Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852
The solution to a problem simply works, But the correct solution works simply.
From: main@Q-List.groups.io [mailto:main@Q-List.groups.io]
On Behalf Of Patrick Panzera
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2019 7:15 AM To: main@q-list.groups.io Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Q-List] Cheap Q2
Where does it say he's selling the engine for $50?
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 3:32 AM Pat Weaver <pweaver311@...> wrote:
Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use, or taking of any action in reliance upon this message by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete it from your computer.
|
||
|
||
Re: Cheap Q2
Where does it say he's selling the engine for $50?
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 3:32 AM Pat Weaver <pweaver311@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Cheap Q2
Pat Weaver
Id like to at least purchase the Revmaster engine for$50. If we can't figure out shipping I will pick it up or lose $50 and you can resell it. I'm ok with that. Either way I would at least like to purchase the Revmaster engine. Thank you in advance.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 8:31 PM Pat Weaver via Groups.Io <pweaver311=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Cheap Q2
Pat Weaver
Is the. $50 Revmaster motor able to be crated? I would gladly pay the shipping if I didn't end up with the Turbo Q2
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 3:30 PM larry severson <larry2@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Cheap Q2
Pat Weaver
Does it have dual controls? Or at least rudder pedals on both sides? What kind of braking system does it have?
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 3:30 PM larry severson <larry2@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Airspace rules
Larry,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thank you for forwarding this slide presentation. Your timing couldn't have been better. I just did my biennial flight review Tuesday and will be doing the ground part in a few days. Excellent material for a rusty ole bugger. Thanks again Welsh, Q-1 N494K
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 6:54 PM Larry Severson <larry2@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Airspace rules
Larry Severson
Things that the typical school does not teach.
Larry Severson 18242 Peters Ct Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852
The solution to a problem simply works, But the correct solution works simply.
|
||
|
||
Re: cheapest
Larry Severson
Yes, as is at KCNO (Chino airport, CA)
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of quickieq2uk via Groups.Io
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:52 PM To: main@q-list.groups.io Subject: Re: [Q-List] cheapest
Are you selling this Larry?
|
||
|
||
Re: cheapest
quickieq2uk
Are you selling this Larry?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 5 Dec 2019, at 19:42, larry severson <larry2@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Cheap Q2
Larry Severson
$4500 on trailer with Turbo Revmaster and 3 blade Warp Drive prop and manuals. (Not LS1)
Recovering my medical will cost too much. Plane has only 17 HRS, but handles well. I did not fully get the heat problems solved.
Larry Severson 18242 Peters Ct Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852
The solution to a problem simply works, But the correct solution works simply.
|
||
|
||
Re: cheapest
ryan goodman
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
|
||
|
||
Re: cheapest
Paul Poulsen
Tempting, even given the trip to the US to pick it up. :)
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 6:42 AM larry severson <larry2@...> wrote:
--
|
||
|
||
cheapest
Larry Severson
Cost $500, includes original manual. Revmaster engine available for $50. I have lots more. Everything is at KCNO (Chino airport)
Larry Severson 18242 Peters Ct Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852
The solution to a problem simply works, But the correct solution works simply.
|
||
|
||
Re: Q2/200 configurations
Thanks for all the good info to everyone!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Mike
On Dec 2, 2019, at 9:48 PM, n7000t via Groups.Io <n7000t@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Q2/200 configurations
Thanks for digging!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Mike
On Dec 2, 2019, at 8:56 PM, Michael <dunningme@...> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Q2/200 configurations
Michael Dunning
The Q-Talk article describing the JimBob 6-pack can be found here: http://www.quickheads.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1165:q-talk-108-the-jim-bob-6-pack&catid=48&Itemid=101
I went through it in August as I was baselining the current work completed on my airframe. Voice of zero experience here, but perusing this list, the archives, and Sam's new and old blogs led me to believe the following revisions may be in order: 1. The bellcrank can be eliminated for the Hoskins setup, reducing weight, build time, and complexity (esp. if combined with the plans quick disconnect). To finish rigging my current bellcrank I think I'll have to wear the tailcone as a hat. Not looking forward to annuals either. 2. The LaRue brake mod is good but superceded by the Coughlin/Hoskins mounting. If reports that you can reuse the stock mounts and wheel covers are true then that's more build time saved. Grainger now sells threaded hollow steel rod of the correct size, making construction of the Coughlin version much easier. 3. The full-swivel tailwheel is nice to have but *potentially* unnecessary (or at least a decision/modification that can be deferred). 4. The Gall wheel alignment must also be completed as the 7th item on a taildragger, especially if operating at high gross weights (the existing alignment problem gets progressively worse as weight increases). 5. Having some sort of independent hydraulic brakes is more important than them strictly being the Matco-type toe brakes called out in the article. I considered heel brakes as a compromise to keep my hands free but a simple bungee rope parking brake across both finger levers may adequately solve the problem... My aircraft currently has the entire 6-pack and Gall alignment completed per the earlier link, except for retaining a stock tailwheel. I intend to revisit items 1, 2, 3, and 5 *after* flying the 40 hours and revising my opinion then (so JP/MD/JM don't burn me at the stake). -- -MD #2827 (still thinking about planning on visualizing how to finish building)
|
||
|
||
Re: Q2/200 configurations
Larry Severson
I put dual cylinder finger brakes for that directional control.
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Sam Hoskins
The problem with the single pull brake is a safety issue. If the tailspring should break, you lose all directional control. With differential brakes you would be able to keep steering the aircraft.
When I had around 1,000 hours on my Q-200, I was getting my BFR and the tailspring broke. I had the per-plans installation. So, touching down at 70 mph and no steering available. We went off the runway and I forced a groundloop my throwing the control stick to the right. Adverse yaw induced the groundloop. The left wheelpant broke off and bounced off the canopy. The resulting prop strike trashed the prob and bent the crankshaft. And, I didn't even get my BFR signed off!
So, during the repair I installed differential braking and split the cables so an independent cable is connected to the rudder and to the tailwheel.
Of course, if I had a tailspring that didn't break, the problem wouldn't have happened, but that's another topic.
Aside from the loss of control issue, I like differential braking a lot more than single pull. You can turn a tighter corner and generally have better control on the ground.
Sam #tailspring #brakes #gallalignment
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:44 AM John Hoxie via Groups.Io <hoxdesigns=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: I am looking for a volunteer to help sort photos on the new Q-List.
Thanks guys. We now have a volunteer and he is busy working on his new job. Thanks for everyone that stepped up and if we need someone else down the line I will certainly let you know. Sam
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 12:44 PM Sam Hoskins via Groups.Io <sam.hoskins=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Q2/200 configurations
I have toe brakes, but that is standard for the Tri-gear. However, in anticipation of maintenance, I did two things. Both of these can be done on a taildragger, to the same effect. 1. I created two ports in the sides of the fuselage for better access.
2. I built the rudder pedals and brake assembly on a removable platform that bolts into the canard and firewall. Note the aluminum angle attached to the platform that allows brake cylinder angle adjustment. I also have a rudder trim servo attached, but that is a little overkill (https://youtu.be/sKq6PnsM8XU ).
The platform approach gives the most flexibility if you need to do a brake cylinder replacement, or rudder assembly overhaul, or you wish to change the position of the rudder pedals easily, should there be a shorter pilot that takes over after I have had my fun.
Pictures of both mods attached. The platform is held down by two bolts and two nuts (on studs mounted to the canard). The platform can be lifted outside the airplane through the port without disconnecting the brake lines if needed.
Cheers, Jay N8WQ
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Matthew Curcio
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2019 12:26 PM To: main@q-list.groups.io Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2/200 configurations
Toe brakes good -Retain the use of your hands during, startup, taxi, and run up -conventional arrangement, most people are accustomed To Bad -poor access for maintenance, installation, and inspection -rudder pedals are not designed for the max pilot effort brake loads reacted by the master cylinders. -some airplanes don’t have the space for the additional travel required. - rudder pedal remains a single point of failure that would likely result in a loss of ground directional control
Finger brakes good -easy access for installation, maintenance and inspection - eliminates the rudder pedal and control circuit as a single point of failure resulting in a loss of ground directional control. (Note there are additional spf’s that would still likely result in a loss of ground directional control such as basically everything in the wheel and axle assemblies) Bad -atypical configuration requires a learning curve -complicates starting and run up as there is not a free hand available to manage the throttle.
I have the finger brakes and I’m very happy with them, however it is obnoxious during startup, and run up. Much of that could be eliminated if I installed a parking brake valve. I have a really nice finger brake module I designed that you can build entirely out of the airplane and then just glass in place with some tapes. It allows for easy removal and maintenance of all of the components.
I don’t have the space for feet and brakes and I found the maintenance to be an issue.
Matthew Curcio 419-290-3773
|
||
|