Date   

Re: Q200 MSFS 2020 AIRCRAFT

Pete Stein
 

Hello,  I for one am interested!

Regards, 

Pete


On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, 22:55 ryan goodman via groups.io <elboy0712=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
If anyone is interested I have converted the fsx q200 aircraft to MSFS 2020 format. If you want it I'll happily share. Not for resale.



Q200 MSFS 2020 AIRCRAFT

ryan goodman
 

If anyone is interested I have converted the fsx q200 aircraft to MSFS 2020 format. If you want it I'll happily share. Not for resale.



Re: Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

Bruce Crain
 

Airplane yard darts.
Bruce


On Apr 15, 2021, at 11:38 AM, Keith Welsh <kw544@...> wrote:


Thanks for the info.  Didn't think would wheat like in the plains states.
Wasn't sure about AZ. Aware of allot of ag around the Maricopa area.
Understand there's a large aquafier in that part of the world.
Ok back to the Q stuff.  Sorry for the side track.
Thanks again.

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "One Sky Dog via groups.io" <Oneskydog@...>
To: <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:11:08 +0000 (UTC)

https://agriculture.az.gov/sites/default/files/ADA%202019%20Crop%20Guide%20Update%20-%20spreads.pdf 

 






 

On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 5:58 AM, Keith Welsh <kw544@...> wrote:

Center Pivot Irrigation.  What crops are raised out there?
Welsh

Please note: message attached

From: "Jay Scheevel" <jay@...>
To: <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:44:23 -0600






Re: Q2 Prototypes

Richard Thomson
 

Jay,

I have a bag of redundant bits from the T tail which are now replaced by the reflexor.

Out of interest has anyone got a set of the plans for the T tail installation so to prove its all gone?

(I know you cant miss it, but proving its not there to an inspector is more difficult than if it was.)

Rich T.

On 15/04/2021 17:02, Jay Scheevel wrote:

Hi Mike,

 

I think the T tail has pretty much gone the way of the dodo bird. For good reason. The reflexor is what is usually used or just the elevator trimwheel style trim. 

 

Here is a paper that was put together by one of the former Quickie Regional Dealers (Mike Huffman) back in the 80’s. He was not from Missouri, but his attitude was the same as the “Show me” state’s. He personally tested the T-tail and the new LS1 Canard (on the factory demonstrator) before he would endorse them. He endorsed the LS1, but not the T-tail.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Steinsland
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 9:57 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io Group Moderators <main@q-list.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

 

So it seems to me you go with the T tail or the reflector.

Is that correct?

 

On Thu., Apr. 15, 2021, 7:54 a.m. Mike Shuck via groups.io, <mikeshuck2001=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

David, 

 

Very interesting! Thank you so much for posting! It would be interesting to see the stats on how one of these prototypes faired against the other. Historically, aircraft designed with compound curves in appropriate places do "better" than geometric, angled, boxy designs... except... well, then the Thorp T-18 and Wittman Tailwinds and BD-4's began to prove themselves. It would be cool to have a full design analysis of each prototype. 

It would be cool to locate Legare's original Q2 drawings and perform a full CFD analysis on them. <Wishful thinking>.

 

Thanks for posting!

 

Mike

 

 

 

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:30 AM, Eugen Pilarski

<interbus@...> wrote:

Garry Legare built the boxy one without QAC knowledge or assistance. Then he
showed up at the factory and they decided he had a good idea. Legare kept
worldwide design and distribution rights, QAC got domestic US design and
distribution rights. The boxy one crashed during development for the kit.
The rebuild included the re-design with molded fuselage parts. The split-up
of design rights led to some divergence between the US version and the
version for the rest of the world; ground handling problems led to Legare
designing the T-tail and QAC designing the reflexor, hence some of the
dichotomy between US Q2/200s and the rest of the world's Q2/200s.


-----Original Message-----
From: 
main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay
Scheevel
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 5:03 PM
To: 
main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

The prototype was built up by hand by Gary Legare in Canada, as a sort of
joint venture with QAC in Mojave. Then there was the demonstrator protoype
that was built in Mojave, which I think was N81QA (yellow), then I think
this one was further modified to become the Q-200 prototype (your photo) by
beefing up the firewall and replacing the GU with the LS1 canard. Others on
this list may know more precisely, but I think that is how it went down. All
of the regional dealers build a Q2 from a kit and used them as
demonstrators. Legare had the exclusive rights to market QAC products in
Canada in exchange for his work on the project. 

Cheers,
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Shuck
via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 5:31 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io
Subject: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Group,

I am curious how there came to be 2 different Q2 prototypes, the boxy one
and the beautifully sculptered one with the compound curves. Who designed
each one?

Just curious from a historical perspective.

Mike (the airfoil guy)















Re: Q2 Prototypes

Brad Baerg
 

I went with both T tail and reflexer. After testing I kept the t tail and made the reflexer into aileron trim , worked very well.

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay Scheevel
Sent: April 15, 2021 9:03 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

 

Hi Mike,

 

I think the T tail has pretty much gone the way of the dodo bird. For good reason. The reflexor is what is usually used or just the elevator trimwheel style trim. 

 

Here is a paper that was put together by one of the former Quickie Regional Dealers (Mike Huffman) back in the 80’s. He was not from Missouri, but his attitude was the same as the “Show me” state’s. He personally tested the T-tail and the new LS1 Canard (on the factory demonstrator) before he would endorse them. He endorsed the LS1, but not the T-tail.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Steinsland
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 9:57 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io Group Moderators <main@q-list.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

 

So it seems to me you go with the T tail or the reflector.

Is that correct?

 

On Thu., Apr. 15, 2021, 7:54 a.m. Mike Shuck via groups.io, <mikeshuck2001=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

David, 

 

Very interesting! Thank you so much for posting! It would be interesting to see the stats on how one of these prototypes faired against the other. Historically, aircraft designed with compound curves in appropriate places do "better" than geometric, angled, boxy designs... except... well, then the Thorp T-18 and Wittman Tailwinds and BD-4's began to prove themselves. It would be cool to have a full design analysis of each prototype. 

It would be cool to locate Legare's original Q2 drawings and perform a full CFD analysis on them. <Wishful thinking>.

 

Thanks for posting!

 

Mike

 

 

 

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:30 AM, Eugen Pilarski

<interbus@...> wrote:

Garry Legare built the boxy one without QAC knowledge or assistance. Then he
showed up at the factory and they decided he had a good idea. Legare kept
worldwide design and distribution rights, QAC got domestic US design and
distribution rights. The boxy one crashed during development for the kit.
The rebuild included the re-design with molded fuselage parts. The split-up
of design rights led to some divergence between the US version and the
version for the rest of the world; ground handling problems led to Legare
designing the T-tail and QAC designing the reflexor, hence some of the
dichotomy between US Q2/200s and the rest of the world's Q2/200s.


-----Original Message-----
From: 
main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay
Scheevel
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 5:03 PM
To: 
main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

The prototype was built up by hand by Gary Legare in Canada, as a sort of
joint venture with QAC in Mojave. Then there was the demonstrator protoype
that was built in Mojave, which I think was N81QA (yellow), then I think
this one was further modified to become the Q-200 prototype (your photo) by
beefing up the firewall and replacing the GU with the LS1 canard. Others on
this list may know more precisely, but I think that is how it went down. All
of the regional dealers build a Q2 from a kit and used them as
demonstrators. Legare had the exclusive rights to market QAC products in
Canada in exchange for his work on the project. 

Cheers,
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Shuck
via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 5:31 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io
Subject: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Group,

I am curious how there came to be 2 different Q2 prototypes, the boxy one
and the beautifully sculptered one with the compound curves. Who designed
each one?

Just curious from a historical perspective.

Mike (the airfoil guy)














Re: Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

 

Thanks for the info.  Didn't think would wheat like in the plains states.
Wasn't sure about AZ. Aware of allot of ag around the Maricopa area.
Understand there's a large aquafier in that part of the world.
Ok back to the Q stuff.  Sorry for the side track.
Thanks again.


---------- Original Message ----------
From: "One Sky Dog via groups.io" <Oneskydog@...>
To: <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:11:08 +0000 (UTC)

https://agriculture.az.gov/sites/default/files/ADA%202019%20Crop%20Guide%20Update%20-%20spreads.pdf 

 






 

On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 5:58 AM, Keith Welsh <kw544@...> wrote:

Center Pivot Irrigation.  What crops are raised out there?
Welsh

Please note: message attached

From: "Jay Scheevel" <jay@...>
To: <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:44:23 -0600




Re: Q2 Prototypes

Martin Skiby
 

No T-tail in my opinion.  It is another drag generator in the wind.  The reflexor did the job well.

-----------------------------------------

From: "Jay Scheevel"
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Cc:
Sent: Thursday April 15 2021 9:03:04AM
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Mike,

 

I think the T tail has pretty much gone the way of the dodo bird. For good reason. The reflexor is what is usually used or just the elevator trimwheel style trim. 

 

Here is a paper that was put together by one of the former Quickie Regional Dealers (Mike Huffman) back in the 80’s. He was not from Missouri, but his attitude was the same as the “Show me” state’s. He personally tested the T-tail and the new LS1 Canard (on the factory demonstrator) before he would endorse them. He endorsed the LS1, but not the T-tail.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Steinsland
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 9:57 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io Group Moderators <main@q-list.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

 

So it seems to me you go with the T tail or the reflector.

Is that correct?

 

On Thu., Apr. 15, 2021, 7:54 a.m. Mike Shuck via groups.io, <mikeshuck2001@...> wrote:

David, 

 

Very interesting! Thank you so much for posting! It would be interesting to see the stats on how one of these prototypes faired against the other. Historically, aircraft designed with compound curves in appropriate places do "better" than geometric, angled, boxy designs... except... well, then the Thorp T-18 and Wittman Tailwinds and BD-4's began to prove themselves. It would be cool to have a full design analysis of each prototype. 

It would be cool to locate Legare's original Q2 drawings and perform a full CFD analysis on them. <Wishful thinking>.

 

Thanks for posting!

 

Mike

 

 

 

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:30 AM, Eugen Pilarski

<interbus@...> wrote:

Garry Legare built the boxy one without QAC knowledge or assistance. Then he
showed up at the factory and they decided he had a good idea. Legare kept
worldwide design and distribution rights, QAC got domestic US design and
distribution rights. The boxy one crashed during development for the kit.
The rebuild included the re-design with molded fuselage parts. The split-up
of design rights led to some divergence between the US version and the
version for the rest of the world; ground handling problems led to Legare
designing the T-tail and QAC designing the reflexor, hence some of the
dichotomy between US Q2/200s and the rest of the world's Q2/200s.


-----Original Message-----
From: 
main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay
Scheevel
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 5:03 PM
To: 
main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

The prototype was built up by hand by Gary Legare in Canada, as a sort of
joint venture with QAC in Mojave. Then there was the demonstrator protoype
that was built in Mojave, which I think was N81QA (yellow), then I think
this one was further modified to become the Q-200 prototype (your photo) by
beefing up the firewall and replacing the GU with the LS1 canard. Others on
this list may know more precisely, but I think that is how it went down. All
of the regional dealers build a Q2 from a kit and used them as
demonstrators. Legare had the exclusive rights to market QAC products in
Canada in exchange for his work on the project. 

Cheers,
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Shuck
via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 5:31 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io
Subject: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Group,

I am curious how there came to be 2 different Q2 prototypes, the boxy one
and the beautifully sculptered one with the compound curves. Who designed
each one?

Just curious from a historical perspective.

Mike (the airfoil guy)















Re: Q2 Prototypes

Jay Scheevel
 

Hi Mike,

 

I think the T tail has pretty much gone the way of the dodo bird. For good reason. The reflexor is what is usually used or just the elevator trimwheel style trim. 

 

Here is a paper that was put together by one of the former Quickie Regional Dealers (Mike Huffman) back in the 80’s. He was not from Missouri, but his attitude was the same as the “Show me” state’s. He personally tested the T-tail and the new LS1 Canard (on the factory demonstrator) before he would endorse them. He endorsed the LS1, but not the T-tail.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Steinsland
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 9:57 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io Group Moderators <main@q-list.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

 

So it seems to me you go with the T tail or the reflector.

Is that correct?

 

On Thu., Apr. 15, 2021, 7:54 a.m. Mike Shuck via groups.io, <mikeshuck2001=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

David, 

 

Very interesting! Thank you so much for posting! It would be interesting to see the stats on how one of these prototypes faired against the other. Historically, aircraft designed with compound curves in appropriate places do "better" than geometric, angled, boxy designs... except... well, then the Thorp T-18 and Wittman Tailwinds and BD-4's began to prove themselves. It would be cool to have a full design analysis of each prototype. 

It would be cool to locate Legare's original Q2 drawings and perform a full CFD analysis on them. <Wishful thinking>.

 

Thanks for posting!

 

Mike

 

 

 

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:30 AM, Eugen Pilarski

<interbus@...> wrote:

Garry Legare built the boxy one without QAC knowledge or assistance. Then he
showed up at the factory and they decided he had a good idea. Legare kept
worldwide design and distribution rights, QAC got domestic US design and
distribution rights. The boxy one crashed during development for the kit.
The rebuild included the re-design with molded fuselage parts. The split-up
of design rights led to some divergence between the US version and the
version for the rest of the world; ground handling problems led to Legare
designing the T-tail and QAC designing the reflexor, hence some of the
dichotomy between US Q2/200s and the rest of the world's Q2/200s.


-----Original Message-----
From: 
main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay
Scheevel
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 5:03 PM
To: 
main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

The prototype was built up by hand by Gary Legare in Canada, as a sort of
joint venture with QAC in Mojave. Then there was the demonstrator protoype
that was built in Mojave, which I think was N81QA (yellow), then I think
this one was further modified to become the Q-200 prototype (your photo) by
beefing up the firewall and replacing the GU with the LS1 canard. Others on
this list may know more precisely, but I think that is how it went down. All
of the regional dealers build a Q2 from a kit and used them as
demonstrators. Legare had the exclusive rights to market QAC products in
Canada in exchange for his work on the project. 

Cheers,
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Shuck
via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 5:31 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io
Subject: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Group,

I am curious how there came to be 2 different Q2 prototypes, the boxy one
and the beautifully sculptered one with the compound curves. Who designed
each one?

Just curious from a historical perspective.

Mike (the airfoil guy)















Re: Q2 Prototypes

Mike Steinsland
 

So it seems to me you go with the T tail or the reflector.
Is that correct?

On Thu., Apr. 15, 2021, 7:54 a.m. Mike Shuck via groups.io, <mikeshuck2001=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
David, 

Very interesting! Thank you so much for posting! It would be interesting to see the stats on how one of these prototypes faired against the other. Historically, aircraft designed with compound curves in appropriate places do "better" than geometric, angled, boxy designs... except... well, then the Thorp T-18 and Wittman Tailwinds and BD-4's began to prove themselves. It would be cool to have a full design analysis of each prototype. 
It would be cool to locate Legare's original Q2 drawings and perform a full CFD analysis on them. <Wishful thinking>.

Thanks for posting!

Mike



On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:30 AM, Eugen Pilarski
<interbus@...> wrote:
Garry Legare built the boxy one without QAC knowledge or assistance. Then he
showed up at the factory and they decided he had a good idea. Legare kept
worldwide design and distribution rights, QAC got domestic US design and
distribution rights. The boxy one crashed during development for the kit.
The rebuild included the re-design with molded fuselage parts. The split-up
of design rights led to some divergence between the US version and the
version for the rest of the world; ground handling problems led to Legare
designing the T-tail and QAC designing the reflexor, hence some of the
dichotomy between US Q2/200s and the rest of the world's Q2/200s.


-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay
Scheevel
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 5:03 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

The prototype was built up by hand by Gary Legare in Canada, as a sort of
joint venture with QAC in Mojave. Then there was the demonstrator protoype
that was built in Mojave, which I think was N81QA (yellow), then I think
this one was further modified to become the Q-200 prototype (your photo) by
beefing up the firewall and replacing the GU with the LS1 canard. Others on
this list may know more precisely, but I think that is how it went down. All
of the regional dealers build a Q2 from a kit and used them as
demonstrators. Legare had the exclusive rights to market QAC products in
Canada in exchange for his work on the project. 

Cheers,
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Shuck
via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 5:31 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io
Subject: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Group,

I am curious how there came to be 2 different Q2 prototypes, the boxy one
and the beautifully sculptered one with the compound curves. Who designed
each one?

Just curious from a historical perspective.

Mike (the airfoil guy)
















Re: Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

One Sky Dog
 

On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 5:58 AM, Keith Welsh <kw544@...> wrote:

Center Pivot Irrigation.  What crops are raised out there?
Welsh

Please note: message attached

From: "Jay Scheevel" <jay@...>
To: <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:44:23 -0600



Re: Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

 

Center Pivot Irrigation.  What crops are raised out there?
Welsh

Please note: message attached

From: "Jay Scheevel" <jay@...>
To: <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:44:23 -0600




Re: Q2 Prototypes

 

David, 

Very interesting! Thank you so much for posting! It would be interesting to see the stats on how one of these prototypes faired against the other. Historically, aircraft designed with compound curves in appropriate places do "better" than geometric, angled, boxy designs... except... well, then the Thorp T-18 and Wittman Tailwinds and BD-4's began to prove themselves. It would be cool to have a full design analysis of each prototype. 
It would be cool to locate Legare's original Q2 drawings and perform a full CFD analysis on them. <Wishful thinking>.

Thanks for posting!

Mike



On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:30 AM, Eugen Pilarski
<interbus@...> wrote:
Garry Legare built the boxy one without QAC knowledge or assistance. Then he
showed up at the factory and they decided he had a good idea. Legare kept
worldwide design and distribution rights, QAC got domestic US design and
distribution rights. The boxy one crashed during development for the kit.
The rebuild included the re-design with molded fuselage parts. The split-up
of design rights led to some divergence between the US version and the
version for the rest of the world; ground handling problems led to Legare
designing the T-tail and QAC designing the reflexor, hence some of the
dichotomy between US Q2/200s and the rest of the world's Q2/200s.


-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay
Scheevel
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 5:03 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

The prototype was built up by hand by Gary Legare in Canada, as a sort of
joint venture with QAC in Mojave. Then there was the demonstrator protoype
that was built in Mojave, which I think was N81QA (yellow), then I think
this one was further modified to become the Q-200 prototype (your photo) by
beefing up the firewall and replacing the GU with the LS1 canard. Others on
this list may know more precisely, but I think that is how it went down. All
of the regional dealers build a Q2 from a kit and used them as
demonstrators. Legare had the exclusive rights to market QAC products in
Canada in exchange for his work on the project. 

Cheers,
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Shuck
via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 5:31 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io
Subject: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Group,

I am curious how there came to be 2 different Q2 prototypes, the boxy one
and the beautifully sculptered one with the compound curves. Who designed
each one?

Just curious from a historical perspective.

Mike (the airfoil guy)
















Re: looking for q-200 project/kit

Robin Nash
 

Here's the thing. I'm located in Alençon, Normandie, France 53370. So is the aircraft - presently partially dismantled for storage and transport. If you want to talk, my landline is +33233150753  cell +447956141833.

Robin

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 09:30, David J. Gall <David@...> wrote:

I might be interested. What’s your location?

 

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Shaun Milke
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:23 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] looking for q-200 project/kit

 

I’ve got an engine and firewall forward package. Could be used on a Q200 fuselage or to convert a Q2 to a Q200.

 

 


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Stan Susman <stanpfa@...>
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 8:17:49 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] looking for q-200 project/kit

 

if you're interested. I have some new parts. fuse, bulkheads, seat/tank, small cowl, canopy. 

 

On Thursday, April 8, 2021, 07:23:45 AM PDT, Brad Walker <bwalker@...> wrote:

 

 

I'm looking for a Q-200 project..

 

If there are any leads or insight where to look, I would appreciate it.

 

Thanks.

 

-brad w.


Re: Q2 Prototypes

Eugen Pilarski
 

Am 15.04.2021 um 09:17 schrieb David J. Gall <David@...>:

Garry Legare built the boxy one without QAC knowledge or assistance. Then he
showed up at the factory and they decided he had a good idea. Legare kept
worldwide design and distribution rights, QAC got domestic US design and
distribution rights. The boxy one crashed during development for the kit.
The rebuild included the re-design with molded fuselage parts. The split-up
of design rights led to some divergence between the US version and the
version for the rest of the world; ground handling problems led to Legare
designing the T-tail and QAC designing the reflexor, hence some of the
dichotomy between US Q2/200s and the rest of the world's Q2/200s.


-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay
Scheevel
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 5:03 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

The prototype was built up by hand by Gary Legare in Canada, as a sort of
joint venture with QAC in Mojave. Then there was the demonstrator protoype
that was built in Mojave, which I think was N81QA (yellow), then I think
this one was further modified to become the Q-200 prototype (your photo) by
beefing up the firewall and replacing the GU with the LS1 canard. Others on
this list may know more precisely, but I think that is how it went down. All
of the regional dealers build a Q2 from a kit and used them as
demonstrators. Legare had the exclusive rights to market QAC products in
Canada in exchange for his work on the project. 

Cheers,
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Shuck
via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 5:31 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io
Subject: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Group,

I am curious how there came to be 2 different Q2 prototypes, the boxy one
and the beautifully sculptered one with the compound curves. Who designed
each one?

Just curious from a historical perspective.

Mike (the airfoil guy)
















Re: looking for q-200 project/kit

David J. Gall
 

I might be interested. What’s your location?

 

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Shaun Milke
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:23 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] looking for q-200 project/kit

 

I’ve got an engine and firewall forward package. Could be used on a Q200 fuselage or to convert a Q2 to a Q200.

 

 


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Stan Susman <stanpfa@...>
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 8:17:49 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] looking for q-200 project/kit

 

if you're interested. I have some new parts. fuse, bulkheads, seat/tank, small cowl, canopy. 

 

On Thursday, April 8, 2021, 07:23:45 AM PDT, Brad Walker <bwalker@...> wrote:

 

 

I'm looking for a Q-200 project..

 

If there are any leads or insight where to look, I would appreciate it.

 

Thanks.

 

-brad w.


Re: Q2 Prototypes

David J. Gall
 

Garry Legare built the boxy one without QAC knowledge or assistance. Then he
showed up at the factory and they decided he had a good idea. Legare kept
worldwide design and distribution rights, QAC got domestic US design and
distribution rights. The boxy one crashed during development for the kit.
The rebuild included the re-design with molded fuselage parts. The split-up
of design rights led to some divergence between the US version and the
version for the rest of the world; ground handling problems led to Legare
designing the T-tail and QAC designing the reflexor, hence some of the
dichotomy between US Q2/200s and the rest of the world's Q2/200s.

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jay
Scheevel
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 5:03 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

The prototype was built up by hand by Gary Legare in Canada, as a sort of
joint venture with QAC in Mojave. Then there was the demonstrator protoype
that was built in Mojave, which I think was N81QA (yellow), then I think
this one was further modified to become the Q-200 prototype (your photo) by
beefing up the firewall and replacing the GU with the LS1 canard. Others on
this list may know more precisely, but I think that is how it went down. All
of the regional dealers build a Q2 from a kit and used them as
demonstrators. Legare had the exclusive rights to market QAC products in
Canada in exchange for his work on the project.

Cheers,
Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Shuck
via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 5:31 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io
Subject: [Q-List] Q2 Prototypes

Hi Group,

I am curious how there came to be 2 different Q2 prototypes, the boxy one
and the beautifully sculptered one with the compound curves. Who designed
each one?

Just curious from a historical perspective.

Mike (the airfoil guy)


Re: Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

smeshno1@...
 

 Those are emergency landing Aerodromes.. always good no matter what the wind direction!!! 😂 

 It's good to see your aviating again, Charlie. 

 Penguin Vern


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Jay Scheevel <jay@...>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 9:44 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!
 

Flying is always a valid excuse! I am really glad you got the Tri-pacer back in the sky. Looks better there than on the ground with no engine. The Cherokee was probably glad to help out his older relative. Great pictures. The guys back east, probably don’t know what those green circles on the ground are.  😊

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of One Sky Dog via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 11:39 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

 

Jay,

 

I missed your presentation I was preoccupied

 

 

Inline image

 

The PA-22-150 has a replacement engine 160 hp from a Cherokee that failed spar inspection.

 

 

Inline image

 

Next the Dragonfly!

Sorry Kevin unable on the Spring Fling. Ya’all have a good time.

 

One Sky Dog


 

On Tuesday, April 13, 2021, 7:07 AM, Jay Scheevel <jay@...> wrote:

Thanks Kevin. Still hoping to make it to the spring fling in order to add to the “strong back brigade” and get that Q properly loaded for the long road trip to the east coast.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Kevin Boddicker
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 7:06 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

 

Jay,

I didn’t get to join live, but the video was great!

Hope to see everyone at the Spring Fling! May 21,22,23, 2021

Just a few short weeks away!

 

It sounds like we have a project to load and send to the east coast.

For those of you that remember Keith Kerr, he passed away Feb 20.

I helped Anthony Parker make the purchase of Keith’s plane. He plans to bring a trailer to the Fling, and with everyone that wants to help, load it up. Should be a fun time.

 

Sam,

Great job as always! 

 

Kevin Boddicker
TriQ 200 N7868B   548 hrs
Luana, IA.


 

On Apr 12, 2021, at 1:47 PM, Sam Hoskins <sam.hoskins@...> wrote:

 

Be sure to take the tour of this very innovative Tri-Q.  Thanks to Jay for showing us around. I hope you are able to get it to Oshkosh and to get it judged, your surely should win something!

https://youtu.be/Xld3mJ-cYAI

Next month's Q-Tour will feature Nathan Peck in his Rotax powered Q-1.  That should be fun.

 


Re: Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

Jay Scheevel
 

Flying is always a valid excuse! I am really glad you got the Tri-pacer back in the sky. Looks better there than on the ground with no engine. The Cherokee was probably glad to help out his older relative. Great pictures. The guys back east, probably don’t know what those green circles on the ground are.  😊

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of One Sky Dog via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 11:39 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

 

Jay,

 

I missed your presentation I was preoccupied

 

 

Inline image

 

The PA-22-150 has a replacement engine 160 hp from a Cherokee that failed spar inspection.

 

 

Inline image

 

Next the Dragonfly!

Sorry Kevin unable on the Spring Fling. Ya’all have a good time.

 

One Sky Dog


 

On Tuesday, April 13, 2021, 7:07 AM, Jay Scheevel <jay@...> wrote:

Thanks Kevin. Still hoping to make it to the spring fling in order to add to the “strong back brigade” and get that Q properly loaded for the long road trip to the east coast.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Kevin Boddicker
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 7:06 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

 

Jay,

I didn’t get to join live, but the video was great!

Hope to see everyone at the Spring Fling! May 21,22,23, 2021

Just a few short weeks away!

 

It sounds like we have a project to load and send to the east coast.

For those of you that remember Keith Kerr, he passed away Feb 20.

I helped Anthony Parker make the purchase of Keith’s plane. He plans to bring a trailer to the Fling, and with everyone that wants to help, load it up. Should be a fun time.

 

Sam,

Great job as always! 

 

Kevin Boddicker
TriQ 200 N7868B   548 hrs
Luana, IA.


 

On Apr 12, 2021, at 1:47 PM, Sam Hoskins <sam.hoskins@...> wrote:

 

Be sure to take the tour of this very innovative Tri-Q.  Thanks to Jay for showing us around. I hope you are able to get it to Oshkosh and to get it judged, your surely should win something!

https://youtu.be/Xld3mJ-cYAI

Next month's Q-Tour will feature Nathan Peck in his Rotax powered Q-1.  That should be fun.

 


Re: Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

Bruce Crain
 

Fantastic Charlie!  That didn't take you long once  you found an engine!  Great pics of the "Great Southwest"!
Bruce


---------- Original Message ----------
From: "One Sky Dog via groups.io" <Oneskydog@...>
To: <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:39:18 +0000 (UTC)

Jay,

 
I missed your presentation I was preoccupied
 
 
 
The PA-22-150 has a replacement engine 160 hp from a Cherokee that failed spar inspection.
 
 
 
Next the Dragonfly!

Sorry Kevin unable on the Spring Fling. Ya’all have a good time.
 
One Sky Dog



On Tuesday, April 13, 2021, 7:07 AM, Jay Scheevel <jay@...> wrote:

Thanks Kevin. Still hoping to make it to the spring fling in order to add to the “strong back brigade” and get that Q properly loaded for the long road trip to the east coast.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Kevin Boddicker
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 7:06 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

 

Jay,

I didn’t get to join live, but the video was great!

Hope to see everyone at the Spring Fling! May 21,22,23, 2021

Just a few short weeks away!

 

It sounds like we have a project to load and send to the east coast.

For those of you that remember Keith Kerr, he passed away Feb 20.

I helped Anthony Parker make the purchase of Keith’s plane. He plans to bring a trailer to the Fling, and with everyone that wants to help, load it up. Should be a fun time.

 

Sam,

Great job as always! 

 

Kevin Boddicker
TriQ 200 N7868B   548 hrs
Luana, IA.





On Apr 12, 2021, at 1:47 PM, Sam Hoskins <sam.hoskins@...> wrote:

 

Be sure to take the tour of this very innovative Tri-Q.  Thanks to Jay for showing us around. I hope you are able to get it to Oshkosh and to get it judged, your surely should win something!

https://youtu.be/Xld3mJ-cYAI

Next month's Q-Tour will feature Nathan Peck in his Rotax powered Q-1.  That should be fun.

 

 
 



Re: Jay Scheevel's Q-Tour is now on YouTube!

Anthony P
 

Tail and engine need to come off to fit into the enclosed trailer.
Will have dollies for mains and rear bulkhead support, and electric winch.
No backs broken.

I may even get out of the cockpit while you guys move it around. :)

Another great Q-tour BTW.

See you soon,

1161 - 1180 of 53004