Date   

Re: Panel CAD File?

ryan goodman
 

I have one


On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 18:31, Nick Wright
<nwright27@...> wrote:
Follow this. I need an outline of the Q2 panel. I have the instrument outlines in PDF format. 


Re: Panel CAD File?

Nick Wright
 

Follow this. I need an outline of the Q2 panel. I have the instrument outlines in PDF format. 


Panel CAD File?

 

Anyone can please share their panel CAD file with me? I realize the exact dimensions may differ but I'd like to take a look at different combos.

Thanks Robert
--
Robert "TheFrisco" Schmid
(408) 805-5450

www.facebook.com/TheFlyingFriscos
www.theflyingfriscos.com

Love building planes almost as much as flying. Latest completed build is "Loki", a Chinook Plus 2 bush plane.


Re: Selling my Q200 stuff

Corbin <c_geiser@...>
 

Pablo,

You gotta follow the instructions.  :)

Corbin

On Apr 21, 2022, at 4:43 PM, pablo barrozo <pablobarrozo09@...> wrote:


Hi Mike.  I'm interested in the stratus. I'm in Brooksville, FL. Cash on hand. 352 942 5449.  
Pablo.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, 5:11 PM Mike Dwyer <q200pilot@...> wrote:
Hi All,
I added a Dynon D10, Stratux ADS-B In, tires wheels, prop extension and bolts to the list of stuff I have for sale.  See the following web site:
If your interested in anything, don't reply to this list!  We don't need to let 500 people in on it!  My email is q2pilot@...
Fly Safe,
Mike Dwyer

Q200 Website: http://goo.gl/V8IrJF


On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 2:21 PM Mike Dwyer <q200pilot@...> wrote:
Hi All,
I'm starting to sell off my Q related stuff.  Check out the web site below for the first batch of stuff.


I have the brakes , tires, and wheels coming up in round 2, along with the prop extension and bolts and some tools like cylinder wrenches. 

If your interested in anything, don't reply to this list!  We don't need to let 500 people in on it!  My email and phone are on that site so use that!

Fly Safe!
Mike Dwyer

Q200 Website: http://goo.gl/V8IrJF


--

Corbin 
N121CG


Re: Selling my Q200 stuff

Mike Dwyer
 


Hi All,
Sorry to bother you again but I sold some stuff and added a bunch of Q specific items to my "sell off my Q related stuff" web site.  Check out the web site below for the current stuff for sale.


I have the oil cooler, exaust pipes, some steam gauges, brakes , tires, and wheels, along with the prop extension and bolts. 

If your interested in anything, don't reply to this list!  We don't need to let 500 people in on it!  My email is q2pilot@... and my phone is on that site so use that!

Fly Safe!
Mike Dwyer

Q200 Website: http://goo.gl/V8IrJF


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Jim Patillo
 

I don’t know how the GU performs with the reflexor.  Every plane is built a little different.
If the canard is installed at the wrong angle of incidence, the airplane, LS1 or GU will perform differently. Dave Dugas can probably answer that question if he has a reflexor. I built mine to lift off with no reflexor input and light back pressure to 
“levitate”.

Jim
N46JP Q200


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Bill Higdon via groups.io <willard561@...>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2022 5:30:31 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com
 
Jim,
Thank you, does the other canard airfoil respond similarly? And I will apologize to the other person on the HBA thread.


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Hot Wings
 

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 02:21 PM, David J. Gall wrote:
I’m betting that person has impeccable credentials
Nope.  One of too many on my ignore list there.  There ARE a lot of bright guys on HBA but there is a definite ebb and flow to the quality of the posts.  Seems to be on the negative side of the sine curve at the moment.


On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 03:09 PM, Bill Higdon wrote:
as you mentioned Marc Z tried to point out the realities.
If he can't handle the thread - there is no point in trying further.


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Bill Higdon
 

Jim,
Thank you, does the other canard airfoil respond similarly? And I will apologize to the other person on the HBA thread.


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Jim Patillo
 

LS1

Jim
N46JP Q200


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Bill Higdon via groups.io <willard561@...>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 7:58:12 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com
 
Good data point for your Q-bird, what canard do you have?


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Bill Higdon
 

Good data point for your Q-bird, what canard do you have?


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

britmcman99
 

image0.jpeg

Phil Lankford

On Apr 22, 2022, at 9:03 AM, ryan goodman via groups.io <elboy0712@...> wrote:

You guys want to talk about auto conversions now?


On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:58, Jay Scheevel
<jay@...> wrote:

I agree, Jim. 

 

I know for a fact that many of my half-baked ideas became “fully baked” and now work as intended because I had both the patience and perseverance to listen to criticism and to study what had been done in that past by folks on this group. I also had to harness enough of my own independence, governed by and instinct for self-preservation to finish my innovations, all without ruining the great flying characteristics of the original design…mission accomplished.

 

There are many folks like this that I have met through this group. I even know this one guy, let’s call him “Alan”, who modified his Q so much that he made it into a tandem cockpit pusher with a big swept wing in back, and winglets with a little tiny canard in front….imagine that…it still flies nicely.

 

I love flying my plane now and love seeing that everyone who built and flies theirs regularly. Each one put a little bit of their own signature on their bird. The similarities and differences sure make our fly-ins much more fun, and we all enjoy hanging around with a crowd of creative people like that.

 

Now if we could only get Jim Patillo to make one more trip over the “hills” to Terre Haute Indiana or Decorah Iowa, that would be worth it!

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jim Patillo
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 9:27 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

 

Ditto. To each his own. Build however you want.

You are the ones that will eventually have your butt in the seat, confirming your “new design”. Once you’ve proven your changes, I’m sure you’ll have an audience here.  While not close to perfect, the Quickie is a fun to build and fly airplane. 

 

To those of you interested in building or finishing a Q, we are always here to help and give you  proven historical perspectives. 



We all need more Quickies in the air and not sitting in hangar's, wasting away. The reason the Q has survived is because of the guys who persisted in finishing and flying their dreams, without the support you all now enjoy. 

 

Best,

Jim

N46JP Q200


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Sam Hoskins <sam.hoskins@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 7:19:55 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io <main@q-list.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

 

No. We don't need to step in. That's why we have this email list. If someone wants to know something about these airplanes, this is definitely the place to come. But for myself, I don't need to throw a rock at somebody else's wasp nest.

 

Sam

 

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, 9:05 PM Bill Higdon via groups.io <willard561=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:

I'm hoping one of our High time pilots will step in & slap this puppy down


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Jim Patillo
 

Bill , I may qualify. 

I use the reflexor (full up) on landing to help slow the plane and keep the tail wheel glued on landing. 
I also use the reflexor in flight, to adjust the W/B as the fuel is burned from the 6gal. aux tank, behind the passenger seat.  If the aux is empty,
main and header full,  reflexor will be neutral, elevators and ailerons in trail, regardless of one or two people. The plane flys hands off with two people on board, straight and level no trim. 
Hope that helps. 

Jim
N46JP-Q200




From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Jay Scheevel <jay@...>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 2:31:14 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com
 

Bill,

 

You will find that everyone uses the reflexor uniquely. Most adjust it once or twice in flight, usually with one setup for takeoff and one for landing. I use mine a slightly more as a trim device but also have a takeoff setting that gets adjusted more nose down soon after takeoff. At least one other Q-driver I am aware of has a continuously adjustable electric motor driven reflexor and uses it for all trim purposes by a stick mounted trim switch.

 

So, you will not find consensus on the use of the reflexor, if that is what you were looking for.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Bill Higdon via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 3:10 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

 

David,

Thank you,when I posted my request here I was hoping to get someone who has a lot of flight time in a Q craft to step in on the use of the relexor, as you mentioned Marc Z tried to point out the realities.

Bill


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Jay Scheevel
 

Bill,

 

You will find that everyone uses the reflexor uniquely. Most adjust it once or twice in flight, usually with one setup for takeoff and one for landing. I use mine a slightly more as a trim device but also have a takeoff setting that gets adjusted more nose down soon after takeoff. At least one other Q-driver I am aware of has a continuously adjustable electric motor driven reflexor and uses it for all trim purposes by a stick mounted trim switch.

 

So, you will not find consensus on the use of the reflexor, if that is what you were looking for.

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Bill Higdon via groups.io
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 3:10 PM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

 

David,

Thank you,when I posted my request here I was hoping to get someone who has a lot of flight time in a Q craft to step in on the use of the relexor, as you mentioned Marc Z tried to point out the realities.

Bill


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Bill Higdon
 

David,

Thank you,when I posted my request here I was hoping to get someone who has a lot of flight time in a Q craft to step in on the use of the relexor, as you mentioned Marc Z tried to point out the realities.

Bill


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

David J. Gall
 

Bill,

That’s unfortunate. I’m betting that person has impeccable credentials, too. There will always be those few and their ardent followers. 

Hard as one might try, one cannot force right-thinking. I noticed that Marc Zeitlin had weighed in — I’d let him carry the burden from there. If he doesn’t take up that challenge then it’s best left where it lays.

JMHO,


David J. Gall


On Apr 22, 2022, at 12:15 PM, Bill Higdon via groups.io <willard561@...> wrote:

David,
I'm concerned one person in the conversation has misunderstanding of what the reflexors do & how they're used. This comes in part from my involvement in the Dragonfly


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Bill Higdon
 

David,
I'm concerned one person in the conversation has misunderstanding of what the reflexors do & how they're used. This comes in part from my involvement in the Dragonfly


Re: Flight over the City

Philip Lam
 

This is the very best Bay Tour video!  (for someone who lives there)

Caption on video states that take-off and landing were at Oakland International (Moffett is no longer an active naval air station).

Thanks, Jim.


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

ryan goodman
 

You guys want to talk about auto conversions now?


On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:58, Jay Scheevel
<jay@...> wrote:

I agree, Jim. 

 

I know for a fact that many of my half-baked ideas became “fully baked” and now work as intended because I had both the patience and perseverance to listen to criticism and to study what had been done in that past by folks on this group. I also had to harness enough of my own independence, governed by and instinct for self-preservation to finish my innovations, all without ruining the great flying characteristics of the original design…mission accomplished.

 

There are many folks like this that I have met through this group. I even know this one guy, let’s call him “Alan”, who modified his Q so much that he made it into a tandem cockpit pusher with a big swept wing in back, and winglets with a little tiny canard in front….imagine that…it still flies nicely.

 

I love flying my plane now and love seeing that everyone who built and flies theirs regularly. Each one put a little bit of their own signature on their bird. The similarities and differences sure make our fly-ins much more fun, and we all enjoy hanging around with a crowd of creative people like that.

 

Now if we could only get Jim Patillo to make one more trip over the “hills” to Terre Haute Indiana or Decorah Iowa, that would be worth it!

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jim Patillo
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 9:27 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

 

Ditto. To each his own. Build however you want.

You are the ones that will eventually have your butt in the seat, confirming your “new design”. Once you’ve proven your changes, I’m sure you’ll have an audience here.  While not close to perfect, the Quickie is a fun to build and fly airplane. 

 

To those of you interested in building or finishing a Q, we are always here to help and give you  proven historical perspectives. 



We all need more Quickies in the air and not sitting in hangar's, wasting away. The reason the Q has survived is because of the guys who persisted in finishing and flying their dreams, without the support you all now enjoy. 

 

Best,

Jim

N46JP Q200


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Sam Hoskins <sam.hoskins@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 7:19:55 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io <main@q-list.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

 

No. We don't need to step in. That's why we have this email list. If someone wants to know something about these airplanes, this is definitely the place to come. But for myself, I don't need to throw a rock at somebody else's wasp nest.

 

Sam

 

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, 9:05 PM Bill Higdon via groups.io <willard561=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:

I'm hoping one of our High time pilots will step in & slap this puppy down


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Jay Scheevel
 

I agree, Jim. 

 

I know for a fact that many of my half-baked ideas became “fully baked” and now work as intended because I had both the patience and perseverance to listen to criticism and to study what had been done in that past by folks on this group. I also had to harness enough of my own independence, governed by and instinct for self-preservation to finish my innovations, all without ruining the great flying characteristics of the original design…mission accomplished.

 

There are many folks like this that I have met through this group. I even know this one guy, let’s call him “Alan”, who modified his Q so much that he made it into a tandem cockpit pusher with a big swept wing in back, and winglets with a little tiny canard in front….imagine that…it still flies nicely.

 

I love flying my plane now and love seeing that everyone who built and flies theirs regularly. Each one put a little bit of their own signature on their bird. The similarities and differences sure make our fly-ins much more fun, and we all enjoy hanging around with a crowd of creative people like that.

 

Now if we could only get Jim Patillo to make one more trip over the “hills” to Terre Haute Indiana or Decorah Iowa, that would be worth it!

 

Cheers,

Jay

 

From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jim Patillo
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 9:27 AM
To: main@Q-List.groups.io
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

 

Ditto. To each his own. Build however you want.

You are the ones that will eventually have your butt in the seat, confirming your “new design”. Once you’ve proven your changes, I’m sure you’ll have an audience here.  While not close to perfect, the Quickie is a fun to build and fly airplane. 

 

To those of you interested in building or finishing a Q, we are always here to help and give you  proven historical perspectives. 



We all need more Quickies in the air and not sitting in hangar's, wasting away. The reason the Q has survived is because of the guys who persisted in finishing and flying their dreams, without the support you all now enjoy. 

 

Best,

Jim

N46JP Q200


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Sam Hoskins <sam.hoskins@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 7:19:55 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io <main@q-list.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

 

No. We don't need to step in. That's why we have this email list. If someone wants to know something about these airplanes, this is definitely the place to come. But for myself, I don't need to throw a rock at somebody else's wasp nest.

 

Sam

 

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, 9:05 PM Bill Higdon via groups.io <willard561=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:

I'm hoping one of our High time pilots will step in & slap this puppy down


Re: Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com

Jim Patillo
 

Ditto. To each his own. Build however you want.
You are the ones that will eventually have your butt in the seat, confirming your “new design”. Once you’ve proven your changes, I’m sure you’ll have an audience here.  While not close to perfect, the Quickie is a fun to build and fly airplane. 

To those of you interested in building or finishing a Q, we are always here to help and give you  proven historical perspectives. 

We all need more Quickies in the air and not sitting in hangar's, wasting away. The reason the Q has survived is because of the guys who persisted in finishing and flying their dreams, without the support you all now enjoy. 

Best,
Jim
N46JP Q200


From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Sam Hoskins <sam.hoskins@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 7:19:55 PM
To: main@q-list.groups.io <main@q-list.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Q-List] Quickie/Q2/Dragonfly control arrangements Thread on Homebuiltaitplanes.com
 
No. We don't need to step in. That's why we have this email list. If someone wants to know something about these airplanes, this is definitely the place to come. But for myself, I don't need to throw a rock at somebody else's wasp nest.

Sam

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, 9:05 PM Bill Higdon via groups.io <willard561=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
I'm hoping one of our High time pilots will step in & slap this puppy down

1241 - 1260 of 55652