I fixed the Q2 plans posted on my blog so that they were easier to navigate and search. The "Table of Contents" now has links to the start of each of the 20 chapters, and I added "next - previous -

Ron Weiss wrote: "...because all the info I can get is that some reduction units don't like 2 bladed wood props(harmonic issues). One guy used a Prince and liked the performance, but, there

David, I have a 2 blade electric constant speed MT. Earnest

Hey Jon Finley, nice to hear from you! I sent an email to you off list and it got bounced as I thought it might. Please email me off list at HawkiDoug@... if you would please. Doug "Hawkeye"

Keith, Would you give us a complete description of your Q1's demo flight ? Ryan experience all they came for and no one left disappointed. And that is always the primary objective. Heck I even gave

David; With the offset thrust line (I assume a belt reduction with the 2/1 ratio rather than planetary) is is possable that whirl mode resonance might also be a problem and contribute to prop flutter

Hi Ron, Afraid I don't check messages here very often so missed your call for help. Yes, I am in the middle of moving to an airpark (Yippee!!!) near Albuquerque, NM so my site is down. As you have

David, I have always mounted my props as you describe until I got my MT. MT installation instructions specifically state that the prop is to be mounted vertically at TDC. Any idea why they do

Thanks Jeff for coming: Glad you enjoyed yourself and liked the burgers. Kinda sweated that one at first, glad everyone liked em. I received several compliments so I guess I'll fix them again. One

--- Awesome info!!!! Thanks,RonIn Q-LIST@..., "David J. Gall" <David@...> wrote: sufficient to get recommend pitch With a 2:1 engine but is propeller. Most alleviate problem

Ron, The spreadsheet Leon tried to send you is located here: http://david.gall.com/files/Airplane/Prop-100.xls. It is based on NACA Technical Memorandum 212. It should be sufficient to get you "into

---------- samle of P51 scoop on Q2

On 5-Jun-06, at 6:00 PM, Reginald Clarke wrote: > > To GROUP > > I am responding because I have experience with SUBARU EA 81 , EJ 2.2 &2.5 and people are asking about these engines. > after about 2

On 5-Jun-06, at 6:00 PM, Reginald Clarke wrote: > > To GROUP > > I am responding because I have experience with SUBARU EA 81 , EJ 2.2 &2.5 and people are asking about these engines. > after about 2

Steve the limiting factor will probably be the diameter. The largest diam will be most efficient. If you decide Warp Drive best to go for the largest diam. ie 60" for a Q Dragger; ? for the triQ. Then

Thank you. Larry Severson Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852 larry2@...

--- Thanks, RonIn Q-LIST@..., "Steve Ham" <sham@...> wrote: might try to Soob's. this Behalf Of no and size)? same

Thanks Keith, Did a great job. The burgers were excellent. Good choice for airports, felt welcomed by all. First time I saw a Q-1 perform, very cool! Nice looking machine too. Jeff Sell

http://quickiebuilders.org/forsale.html Bob Hazen has dropped the price of his father's Q2. Go to the above link to check it out. Doug "Hawkeye" Humble www.asignabove.net Omaha NE N25974