Tom, If you have a Revmaster 2100d, it already has a fordged crank! Steve Ham

Richard I'm retired from SW PAINT Co. Auto Div. I have worked on a few Vetts.I'll need more info to help. Jim in Oregon 541

Ron You just made me feel better, I'm about to make my first in my Q1. My 2 nd taxi was a lot like your fight, about 15 to 20 min into the taxi I was about to pull it off the gound for about a

Hi there Quickie Builders and Flyers, Wow, there are a lot of you on this group. Let me introduce myself. First of all, I don't own a Quickie, but am considering the purchase of a complete kit from

Yes, those big parts go together quite fast, looks great. Ron Triano N91RT Sonerai IIs, is a bird, it really flies Q200, Back working on it, soon to be flying

Congratulations on your first flight!! Tom and I set all the other work projects aside this weekend to to the main wing bottom side layups. It sure looks nice getting something done.

Way to go Ron, now you can finish the Q..\ Dtevbe Ham

Just an FYI on combining FOD and OSH - I could not do both all in the same week or close together. Doug "Hawkeye" Humble A Sign Above www.asignabove.net Omaha NE N25974

Congratulations Ron!! Jon

Hi folks, I took the leisure of looking up the miles to Ripon in front of Oshkosh and also noting the hotels and cafes from several airstrips that Jeff sent. Some of them have fairly short mileages

Well, today was the day for N91RT to become a full fledged bird, Taxied to runway 34, applied full power and with my knees knocking made it up to 80 indicated, gently pulled back on the stick and it

Plans, chapter 3, pages 11-13.

Can anyone advise how to deal with local crazing and sunbumps? I have several areas on the Tri-Q I am restoring where there are small patches (1-2" dia ) that need local repair, the main area around

Does anyone know any thing about this Q that they could add???? wrote: Aircraft_W0QQitemZ260036787397QQihZ016QQcategoryZ63679QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewI

Tad Simpson wrote: "There was a concern that I had sealed around the canard and lost the 1/8th in gap between the fuselage and canard as it would change the charachteristics of the canard and the

Hi Tad and all: Been reading with much interest the ideas forthcoming for the 07 FOD event. Regarding Mattoon, IL it too, probably, meets all the criteria mentioned, uncontrolled, crossing rwys (150

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Quickie-2-1982-Experimental- Aircraft_W0QQitemZ260036787397QQihZ016QQcategoryZ63679QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewI tem Not too late for someone to pick up a Q for maybe less than

Tad, Mine is a conventional gear Q. You bring up a good point. I am not an aeronautical engineer. I do not know how to determine the effect of the faring on the bending of the canard during

Larry, You'll need QBA QuickTalk/Q-Talk issue #11 for LaRue details and issue #27 for the further evolution of the concept by Don Coughlin. Jon Finley N90MG - Q2 - Subaru EJ-22

Tad, One of the many differences between the Q and DF is that with the Q, the wing and canard are permanently bonded to the fuselage... no gap. The root faring as shown shouldn't cause much (if any)