Yeah, I was thinking about that, the problem is I'd only be able to spend the day there, and it's a little far. Who knows, though, I still might try to go Q's and year flight.

Spent Sunday with Susie Richardson at Stow near Akron. Ceremonies were teary. D&S were VERY involved with their Presbyterian church. Susie will have lots of help and comfort with this. She is

You could join us at one of our annual gatherings and see several Q's and maybe get a demo ride or two. http://www.mountainstatesfly-in.com/ Pat

Hey all, I'm considering buying or building a Q2 withen the next year or 2. I'm currently in Albuquerque until May, and was wondering if there was anyone in the area that was willing to give a demo

Hey Gang! We there are only 5 weeks until our annual fly-in. www.ContactMagazine.com/Roundup.html Time is running out... cheap rooms are selling out. If you are planning to attend it's best to

QAC newsletters 18 and 19 indicate that QAC didn't want to approve heavier engines on the GU canard, or raise the gross above 1000 lbs. The LS-1 with carbon spar allowed a gross of 1100 lbs and QAC

Joe Horvath of Revmaster will be at our annual fly-in, http://www.mountainstatesfly-in.com/ speaking on the R-3000 and will have one on display. Pat

It is actually 110HP and weighs 204 lbs with built in 20 amp alternator and a second alternator driving dual electronic ignition. Larry Severson Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)

The GU As has been pointed out, the GU canard is well able to support the weight of a heavier engine without sagging, as it is good for 30g. However, it was the lack of sufficient elevator authority,

Larry, Thanks for the imput regarding the GU airfoil. However, Eric wanted the Q2 in the conventional gear configuration along with 100 hp. Joseph larry severson <larry2@...>

I was trying to get some foam over here in Germany and since we don't have Aircraft Spruce I was looking for the specs for blue and white foam. I did find dow chemicals in Germany for the blue foam

Reference to the below: If the plane is a triQ, the GU canard will support any weight the engine can lift. The weakness of the GU canard vs the LS1 only has impact on bounced landings WITH tip gear.

Eric, I want to throw in another disclaimer. I have flown in an Q2 with a GU canard. While I have been a passenger in several Q200's, I cannot say I have been PIC in one. My previous

Hello Joseph, Thanks for the tip, I still havent heard anything more out of them about the TriQ over there. She was going to let me know if it was GU or LS1 but still nothing and I still havent sent

Eric, I am not an aeronautical engineer. What I have heard: The GU is laminar flow. It has low drag characteristics. It is very efficient. The only problem encountered with it was

Is the LS1 canard and wing air foil so much better that its worth rebuilding the Canard and wing.? Thanks for the reply --------------------------------- Now that's room service! Choose from over

Dear Jerry, Thanks for sharing this wonderful tribute to Dave. CeeRod Jerry Marstall wrote:

Thank you for posting this Jerry. Darrell Daniels

There is a slide show journaling David's life on website www.redmonfh.yourtribute.com/davidrichardson. It is very nice. You may also sign the guestbook. It also has a link to the obituary in the

It was part of the Louisiana Purchase. That puts it near Baton Rouge, doesn't it? Deems Herring