Lynn, What you describe is what I have for the GU canard although it's accuracy is in question. I will double check it per the core cutting templates and bring with me to Ottawa. Jon

Unfortunately, my canard template is for the LS-1. If someone could cut out a female template for the GU, we would have both for comparisons of all aircraft. Take the hotwire template for cutting the

Lynn, Yes, please bring them and find me as soon as you get there. Are these templates for the GU canard? We will plan on measuring all planes that show up at Ottawa (depending on which canard they

Hi all, There have been several questions about the appearance of some of the recent messages (they appear to be forwards). What we are doing is forwarding messages over from the old Q-list to the

The fact that you built your Q with these plans is not a validation of the quality of the plans - just of your intelligence and determination. The fact that the EZ plans are also poor (I have never

I have the female templates cut out for BL48.8 and a Super Level (digital) that seemed to work the best for me. Could bring them if needed. Lynn

Guys, Welcome to all of you who have already signed up on the new Q-LIST. Please take the time to unsubscribe from the old list. Just sendout a blank message to the following

Thanks Paul. I haven't moved the CG way back and tried to pitch buck. May try that soon. I really wonder if that t-tail is doing something to prevent pitch buck! Yes, the Soob is heavier than the

Jon, I think my canard is mounted slightly "down" as well (same problem - I don't have the tools to measure it accurately!). I have to keep the ailerons reflexed up slightly to keep it straight and

Sam, Mike, Larry, Thanks for the input. Since my plane doesn't exhibit the behavior you guys are talking about I suspect my templates are not accurate. I will work on this, get a digital level, and

John, Sounds like I better explain myself so I don't sound like I'm dreaming up some hair brained idea!! My Q2 has over 400 hours. It flew almost all that time with a Revmaster. Now flying with the

Test number two 2345 sdfgg

Hi all, I'm pleased to report that a new list now exists for the sole purpose of discussing performance enhancements for our Q's. This list is NOT for general Q discussion (that is the purpose of

test 1

Boy oh boy Justin,, at a glance that prop is sure out of balance. For instance, at the 75% mark, one blade has a 45.5" pitch and the other blade is 56" ! It gets worse as the distance gets out. I

Bruce My PC is acting up ! Did you get my mail of a few minutes ago listing the 'Waddelow' canard constructional differences ? What kind of pics are you thinking of ? An LS1 canard is an

Bruce I have the plans and constructional notes for the 'Waddelow' canard but I will have to photo-copy them as I don't have a scanner, and send them snail mail. This may take a couple of

Thanks Larry Danel Estes and Patricia Wright were, maybe still are, building a Tri-Q 200 with a Waddelow canard. I would like to know if they made any mods to the canard, did they load test it and,