Dennis Clark, if you are on the list please contact me, or anyone that can put me in touch with him. Thanks Terry Crouch Quickie N14TC

Dennis Clark, if you are on the list please contact me, or anyone that can put me in touch with him. Thanks Terry Crouch Quickie N14TC

http://www.loram.org/Q2%20Parts%20List.htm

I purchased a "complete kit" a few weeks ago, but I cannot find a packing list or parts list for the hardware. Can anyone help me with this? I want to make sure that we have all the hardware we need

BTW; I like the last photo, he's got some sort of cross sticker on the intake plenums. I think that is an attempt to gain faith that the old chevy will hold together. :-) Jon

Hi Doug, I saw them in the "One Sky Dog 2009" folder in the DragonflyList photos (the last several, by date, in that folder).

Where can we see those photos of Charlie's project? Doug Humble A Sign Above www.asignabove.net Omaha NE 402-250-9075

Sorry about that... I sent the wrong link. Try this one... http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2104398&id=1191305585&l=96a596cc6d Pat

Charlie, Jerry, Jim, & Martin, I appreciate the input. I am very happy with my spinner, just not the piece of tubing. Hopefully Bob's stitching solution will take care of it. This is definitely one

Hi Bob, I used "rubber" generically, sounds like you are using about the same thing I am. However; I hadn't thought about "stitching" the ends together with safety wire - great idea!! I will give

Jon, Thanks, still details,details, but closing in, Charlie PS Get to work Alan

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=32151588&l=8ac92106cf&id=1191305585

I have no interest in changing the Canard. I was referring to the main wing only. I got the info for the layup on the main wing. Thanks all for the help.

The Waddelow main wing would make for a much stronger wing. However I don't think that is the weak link as the canard gets all the abuse.Bruce

I built the Waddelow Canard and main wing (228" using 248" plans don't know why I just did). The Waddelow canard is only for a TriQ. It will not work for a tail dragger.Bruce _,_._,___

Thanks Paul, I was thinking exactly about doing the same thing with the conduit. I have the schedule that Sam H. Used to build his new main wing. Sounds like it is the same deal. Thanks for the

Actually Leon, the Waddelow canard was specifically for the Tri gear, but the revised wing lay-up schedule was for the benefit of any Q. Paul Buckley Cheshire England

You can go ahead with the foam cutting, there is no difference with that. The only difference is fairly minor, in that the spar caps are not square ended as per the plans, but tapered at the end to

The Waddelow wings were intended for the Tri-Q and were optionally of longer span. Basically the difference in the lay-up schedule was to accommodate the longer span and reduced landing gear loads on

I have been told about a new lay up schedule for the main wing for the Q-200. The Wadlow schedule? Does anyone have the specifics on this and comments on its benifit. We are going to start the foam