|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
I've got a little more time before I need to start worrying about my first flight. Hopefully late next spring or early summer? So I've got all winter to slim down. I had gotten down to around
I've got a little more time before I need to start worrying about my first flight. Hopefully late next spring or early summer? So I've got all winter to slim down. I had gotten down to around
|
By
Phil Christiansen <rxforfun51@...>
·
#38814
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Exactly. If you could get down to say 190 or less that would help a bunch. Remember the 0200 is only 100 horse and weight is not your friend.Bruce
Exactly. If you could get down to say 190 or less that would help a bunch. Remember the 0200 is only 100 horse and weight is not your friend.Bruce
|
By
Bruce Crain
·
#38813
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Jim Doyle
930 hours
ex Tri-Q C-85
Jim Doyle
930 hours
ex Tri-Q C-85
|
By
Jim D
·
#38812
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Jim,
It's just as effective a training tool as any of the PC based certified
units available, so long as the model is accurate. I don't know if a Q model
is available, but if it is, this would be WAY
Jim,
It's just as effective a training tool as any of the PC based certified
units available, so long as the model is accurate. I don't know if a Q model
is available, but if it is, this would be WAY
|
By
Patrick Panzera <panzera@...>
·
#38811
·
|
|
Re: Training in a Q . . .
This might already be on the agenda. I will need to wait until we get more details from Richard.
Thanks,
Dan Yager
QBA Editor
www.quickheads.com
This might already be on the agenda. I will need to wait until we get more details from Richard.
Thanks,
Dan Yager
QBA Editor
www.quickheads.com
|
By
quickheads
·
#38810
·
|
|
Re: Training in a Q . . .
What a great idea! However, would it also be possible to include the TRI-Qs in this waiver also? After all the recent TO & landing discussions, there are obviously some significant differences
What a great idea! However, would it also be possible to include the TRI-Qs in this waiver also? After all the recent TO & landing discussions, there are obviously some significant differences
|
By
Mike Evans
·
#38809
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
This might be fun but it certainly not a substitute. If you gain
confidence from this, best of luck.
J
This might be fun but it certainly not a substitute. If you gain
confidence from this, best of luck.
J
|
By
jnmarstall <jnmarstall@...>
·
#38808
·
|
|
Airheart brakes needed.
Anybody have a set of Hurst Airhart brake calipers that they do not want?
I'm looking for an unused set. Please contact me off line at
sam.hoskins@... or 1-618-967-0016
I need a set
Anybody have a set of Hurst Airhart brake calipers that they do not want?
I'm looking for an unused set. Please contact me off line at
sam.hoskins@... or 1-618-967-0016
I need a set
|
By
Sam Hoskins
·
#38807
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Imraan,
Now you have got it!
And that soft surface short field take off in a Tri gear spam can will be
very useful for the your Tri Q.
It is quite a good analogy of how it is.
Just remember
Imraan,
Now you have got it!
And that soft surface short field take off in a Tri gear spam can will be
very useful for the your Tri Q.
It is quite a good analogy of how it is.
Just remember
|
By
Gary McKirdy
·
#38805
·
|
|
Training in a Q . . .
All,
Richard Kaczmarek contacted me yesterday to say that he is having the FAA come out to his hanger today to discuss a flight training waiver for the Q2 and Q-200. If the waiver is approved, this
All,
Richard Kaczmarek contacted me yesterday to say that he is having the FAA come out to his hanger today to discuss a flight training waiver for the Q2 and Q-200. If the waiver is approved, this
|
By
quickheads
·
#38804
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Thank you for the correction. I think my confusion was from inadequate differentiation between a TriQ and Q takeoff, which you'd already pointed out.
If I'm now correct, the essential difference:
Thank you for the correction. I think my confusion was from inadequate differentiation between a TriQ and Q takeoff, which you'd already pointed out.
If I'm now correct, the essential difference:
|
By
quickieaircraft
·
#38803
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Bruce,
I'm a little over 200 right now (~210). I'll get to work on that diet right away! :) Plus, the more weight I take off now, the more the wife can carry in luggage when we get ready to
Bruce,
I'm a little over 200 right now (~210). I'll get to work on that diet right away! :) Plus, the more weight I take off now, the more the wife can carry in luggage when we get ready to
|
By
Phil Christiansen <rxforfun51@...>
·
#38802
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Jerry,
Thanks for clarifying that point for me. It wasn't me that posted the note below (it was Quickieaircraft)? But that comment did confuse me as I thought the reflexor trailing edge should
Jerry,
Thanks for clarifying that point for me. It wasn't me that posted the note below (it was Quickieaircraft)? But that comment did confuse me as I thought the reflexor trailing edge should
|
By
Phil Christiansen <rxforfun51@...>
·
#38801
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Hi Rich,I have the Waddelow wing and canard but have the reflexor. Don't know what the DeVere trimmer is. Is that the T-tail on the vertical?Bruce
Hi Rich,I have the Waddelow wing and canard but have the reflexor. Don't know what the DeVere trimmer is. Is that the T-tail on the vertical?Bruce
|
By
Bruce Crain
·
#38800
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Guys,
So is anyone on the list flying a Waddlelow canard with a DeVere trimmer these days ?
This might help with the lift characteristics as it is futher aft, thus better moment arm than the
Guys,
So is anyone on the list flying a Waddlelow canard with a DeVere trimmer these days ?
This might help with the lift characteristics as it is futher aft, thus better moment arm than the
|
By
Richard Thomson
·
#38799
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
Phil, you want the aileron TE _*UP*_.
jerry M
Phil, you want the aileron TE _*UP*_.
jerry M
|
By
jnmarstall <jnmarstall@...>
·
#38798
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
I like to cruise with full up ailerons. I get 4mph. Suspect it's due to reducing lift of rear wing so you must go forward with the stick thus reducing lift of front wing. The lift reduction results
I like to cruise with full up ailerons. I get 4mph. Suspect it's due to reducing lift of rear wing so you must go forward with the stick thus reducing lift of front wing. The lift reduction results
|
By
Mike Dwyer
·
#38797
·
|
|
Re: Q-Flight CounselorPhil c.
I try to keep the passenger under 200. Can plan for a bit less fuel to make that work.Bruce
I try to keep the passenger under 200. Can plan for a bit less fuel to make that work.Bruce
|
By
Bruce Crain
·
#38796
·
|
|
Re: Reflexor positioning
Woops Typo, 4th to last para should read Ground Angle of Attack not C of G.
Sorry Gary
--
All the best airfields in Southern Britain are in Northern France.
[Non-text portions of this message have
Woops Typo, 4th to last para should read Ground Angle of Attack not C of G.
Sorry Gary
--
All the best airfields in Southern Britain are in Northern France.
[Non-text portions of this message have
|
By
Gary McKirdy
·
#38795
·
|
|
Re: Reflexor positioning
Hi Jerry,
For confirmation, I totally agree with your clarifications and additions to
my post.
Stick forward as I described it could be misconstrued as forward of neutral
and that is not what I
Hi Jerry,
For confirmation, I totally agree with your clarifications and additions to
my post.
Stick forward as I described it could be misconstrued as forward of neutral
and that is not what I
|
By
Gary McKirdy
·
#38794
·
|