|
Conversion of Q2 to Q2/O200
Re O200 conversion for a Q2, Mark Summers made a very successful conversion of his Revmaster Q2 to an O200 powered Q2/O200. He did not change the canard, but did add the Ohio State Voyager style vg's.
Re O200 conversion for a Q2, Mark Summers made a very successful conversion of his Revmaster Q2 to an O200 powered Q2/O200. He did not change the canard, but did add the Ohio State Voyager style vg's.
|
By
Bob Farnam
·
#42547
·
|
|
Re: Flight Report
"fowl" - sounds tasty;)
---In Q-LIST@..., <q2pilot@...> wrote :
I have an old Electroair Electronic ignition to the lower plugs and mag on the top plugs. It appears that you can fowl both!
Curious
"fowl" - sounds tasty;)
---In Q-LIST@..., <q2pilot@...> wrote :
I have an old Electroair Electronic ignition to the lower plugs and mag on the top plugs. It appears that you can fowl both!
Curious
|
By
Allan Farr
·
#42546
·
|
|
Re: Flight Report
By
Bruce Crain
·
#42545
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
Um yeah... with two-up, that leaves you about 30 lbs for fuel- if the plane doesn't exceed the advertised empty weight.
Um yeah... with two-up, that leaves you about 30 lbs for fuel- if the plane doesn't exceed the advertised empty weight.
|
By
Patrick Panzera
·
#42544
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
Right there is the most telling reason why you don't want to fly the Revmaster. When I had the Revmaster I limited my passenger weight to 400 lbs. 200 for me, 200 for the passenger.
Right there is the most telling reason why you don't want to fly the Revmaster. When I had the Revmaster I limited my passenger weight to 400 lbs. 200 for me, 200 for the passenger.
|
By
Jerry Marstall
·
#42543
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
Thanks. I do worry about weight especially because i weight 240 dry. And all of my friends and potential passengers are around the same if not more.
Thanks. I do worry about weight especially because i weight 240 dry. And all of my friends and potential passengers are around the same if not more.
|
By
Jeff Sellars
·
#42542
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
IMHO, the 120 hp Jab would get you there without much (if any) weight penalty, but there are cooling issues with the Jab 3300.
Otherwise getting that much power will cost you a lot of weight, or a lot
IMHO, the 120 hp Jab would get you there without much (if any) weight penalty, but there are cooling issues with the Jab 3300.
Otherwise getting that much power will cost you a lot of weight, or a lot
|
By
Patrick Panzera
·
#42541
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
Hi Pat and everyone. Thanks for your input and all of the concerns on the private chats to.
I need to consider all option.
But if i end up doing a re-power, while spending all of that time and
Hi Pat and everyone. Thanks for your input and all of the concerns on the private chats to.
I need to consider all option.
But if i end up doing a re-power, while spending all of that time and
|
By
Jeff Sellars
·
#42540
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
For what it's worth, the Jab cylinders are 4140 chro-mo steel (machined from billet), not made from aluminum. They are however painted silver so maybe that's how they might be mistaken for aluminum.
For what it's worth, the Jab cylinders are 4140 chro-mo steel (machined from billet), not made from aluminum. They are however painted silver so maybe that's how they might be mistaken for aluminum.
|
By
Patrick Panzera
·
#42539
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
My buddy runs a 3300 in his Arion Lightning. He sets his cruise power to 5 GPH. If you push the throttle all the way in he burns 12 GPH and doesn't go much faster. I think the Bing(?) carbs are set
My buddy runs a 3300 in his Arion Lightning. He sets his cruise power to 5 GPH. If you push the throttle all the way in he burns 12 GPH and doesn't go much faster. I think the Bing(?) carbs are set
|
By
Mike Dwyer
·
#42538
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
Anyone who likes airplanes, especially homebuilt ones is on my "good" list. :)
Pat
Anyone who likes airplanes, especially homebuilt ones is on my "good" list. :)
Pat
|
By
Patrick Panzera
·
#42537
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
Hi Jeff,
If you decide to go to the O-200. I have the original QAC baffles (pre-cut) and the original QAC prop extension that you could probably talk me into selling, but not before I am convinced
Hi Jeff,
If you decide to go to the O-200. I have the original QAC baffles (pre-cut) and the original QAC prop extension that you could probably talk me into selling, but not before I am convinced
|
By
Jay Scheevel
·
#42536
·
|
|
Re: Flight Report
I am using the RWS fuel injection and ignition system, which I believe is no longer available. Electronic ignition is supplied by Chevy LS1 coils and goes to the bottom plugs and my magneto goes to
I am using the RWS fuel injection and ignition system, which I believe is no longer available. Electronic ignition is supplied by Chevy LS1 coils and goes to the bottom plugs and my magneto goes to
|
By
Sam Hoskins
·
#42535
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
You should count on your flying ability more.
All engines are prone to failure- ALL of them.
I had a crank bust in half while on a missed approach, in a Cherokee 180 that had just come out of annual.
You should count on your flying ability more.
All engines are prone to failure- ALL of them.
I had a crank bust in half while on a missed approach, in a Cherokee 180 that had just come out of annual.
|
By
Patrick Panzera
·
#42534
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
I dont feel as much fear of an engine loss in my kitfox 3 as my approach speed is around 35 to 50 mph and i can put in down almost anywhere in 300 feet or so, but the Q? Coming down at 80 to 90 mph?
I dont feel as much fear of an engine loss in my kitfox 3 as my approach speed is around 35 to 50 mph and i can put in down almost anywhere in 300 feet or so, but the Q? Coming down at 80 to 90 mph?
|
By
Jeff Sellars
·
#42533
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
Ah, well there you go!
Pat
Ah, well there you go!
Pat
|
By
Patrick Panzera
·
#42532
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
That sounds line a really long way to go about extending one's TBO.
How about buying the latest generation of Revmaster engines, the 2331cc R2300, that's worked out the issues of valve readjusting and
That sounds line a really long way to go about extending one's TBO.
How about buying the latest generation of Revmaster engines, the 2331cc R2300, that's worked out the issues of valve readjusting and
|
By
Patrick Panzera
·
#42531
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
My q2 already has the LS1 canard. So i think im ok with an o 200 conversion
.
My q2 already has the LS1 canard. So i think im ok with an o 200 conversion
.
|
By
Jeff Sellars
·
#42530
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
It might be easier to convert to a triq than build a canard.
On Oct 20, 2014 12:11 PM, "Patrick Panzera editor@... [Q-LIST]" <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
It might be easier to convert to a triq than build a canard.
On Oct 20, 2014 12:11 PM, "Patrick Panzera editor@... [Q-LIST]" <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
|
By
Jerry Marstall
·
#42529
·
|
|
Re: Revmaster 2100
I believe the plane in question is already built as a Q2.
Are you recommending that he change the engine and canard to Q200?
I believe the plane in question is already built as a Q2.
Are you recommending that he change the engine and canard to Q200?
|
By
Patrick Panzera
·
#42528
·
|