Caveat: this doesn't apply to experimental. But it's the standard for certified and fully aligns with what most people seem to think is prudent. You are the ultimate decider though.

(...yawn...) Ok, I'm awake now, my bad. I've got a 60"x68" prop on mine and have no problems with ground clearance. I haven't measured it with the fuselage level. I'll try to do that next time I'm

Chris, Im not qualified to answer but 3 inch Prop /Gnd clearance Doesn't sound enough ! .. The Flying Q guys are asleep on this one !? .. Seeing the Exhaust coming out of the Cowling is

Is it true? Does one's name have to be Dave to fly a pure Q2?

Dave Smith Very nice Q Tour of your plane. I was very interested in your construction, especially the engine installation and baffling. Beautiful job. Thank you.... Dave Dugas

Dave Smith I really enjoyed watching and listening to your video! Fantastic, low weight, beautiful Quickie! In a shameless plug we could use more great stories and aircraft at Field Of Dreams next

I have these to start with. Probably need some touch-ups. Cheers, Jay

What are we looking for in prop to ground clearance?.  Does the Q do a flair on landing or does it stay relativley flat?  With the water line level I have three inch clearance with a 58 inch prop.

Richard, I am hoping that someone will step up and format a full-size drawing that can be downloaded, maybe as a .dxf type file. Maybe you for instance? I think what needs to happen is to first get a

I've been thinking about that vacation we had south of Tampa in October now for a week! From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of Bruce Crain <jcrain2@...> Sent: Wednesday,

Nope. Not suffering. But that’s all I can say for now. 😎 Bruce

That is true. Tulsa has over 130 main water breaks. We are located about 40 miles West of the city. Any city from here South have few preparations for polar winters. Never seen Houston with snow on

Thank you Sam. I'll be making a study of them late at night when no one is looking!!😉 From: main@Q-List.groups.io <main@Q-List.groups.io> on behalf of main@Q-List.groups.io Notification

A "FrankenBird", Chris. The O-235 installed is heavier than the O-200. Do you know how the Canadian authorities worked with this aircraft and Mr.Mc Andrew and the registrations? I believe there may

Sounds like you could just set that prepreg outside these days, Vern 😊 Cheers, Jay

Sam, I am not currently building, but studying the core and carbon process and interested in the LS-1 specifications. I have viewed the LS-1 Canard Plans Templates.jpg and found the resolution is

Regarding the  Weishaar - Doyle canard, if you look at the Dragonfly plans you will find they are very similar. The Dragonfly has a C spar going the entire length. It is made a bit smaller when it

Thanks for correcting me Sam. Do you know if anyone is flying their design on a taildragger? Terry Crouch Quickie N14TC Sent from the all new Aol app for iOS

Marc Waddelow did test his canard. I believe Jim Masal either was there to watch or talked with Marc about it. Jim said it did not quite pass the load test but he also said the fixture or saddle

I don't have any contacts inside Nordam now Charlie but that may change as the year moves on..especially for Contractors. The biz-jet business is not as impacted by the current travel restrictions as