|
Re: Q1 Fuselage comes up
Dear Q-list members,
thank you very much for your notes! That’s great! From a German guy I got the original Q1 plans from 1981 and every time I picked up the roll of paper it’s fell like magic.
Dear Q-list members,
thank you very much for your notes! That’s great! From a German guy I got the original Q1 plans from 1981 and every time I picked up the roll of paper it’s fell like magic.
|
By
Eugen Pilarski
·
#52311
·
|
|
Re: Q1 Fuselage comes up
Vern,
I appreciate your enthusiasm but:
Carbon and titanium and prohibitions – oh, my! These planes are made from super-cheap insulation materials sourced from Home Depot and a second-hand
Vern,
I appreciate your enthusiasm but:
Carbon and titanium and prohibitions – oh, my! These planes are made from super-cheap insulation materials sourced from Home Depot and a second-hand
|
By
David J. Gall
·
#52310
·
|
|
Re: O-200 with very low hours 80ish had prop strike but supposed to have no Crank damage. 4,000$
Thrust flanges are prone to cracking after ANY strike, but they don't always fail right away. It's a big unknown WHEN. I've seen a live example that I refused to allow my pilot and friend to fly with.
Thrust flanges are prone to cracking after ANY strike, but they don't always fail right away. It's a big unknown WHEN. I've seen a live example that I refused to allow my pilot and friend to fly with.
|
By
Frankenbird Vern
·
#52309
·
|
|
Re: Q1 Fuselage comes up
David.. Eugen is installing a modified B&S Vanguard V2 engine. Structurally I agree with the additional stiffening. My memory of the Onan Q1 I flew years ago was that all things considered the
David.. Eugen is installing a modified B&S Vanguard V2 engine. Structurally I agree with the additional stiffening. My memory of the Onan Q1 I flew years ago was that all things considered the
|
By
Frankenbird Vern
·
#52308
·
|
|
Re: Q1 Fuselage comes up
Eugen,
Yes, you understand the plans correctly with regard to the BID. You really should have a PDF of the original plans for reference; the OCR version on the Quickheads site is very well done
Eugen,
Yes, you understand the plans correctly with regard to the BID. You really should have a PDF of the original plans for reference; the OCR version on the Quickheads site is very well done
|
By
David J. Gall
·
#52307
·
|
|
Re: O-200 with very low hours 80ish had prop strike but supposed to have no Crank damage. 4,000$
Glad you brought that up Sam. I was going to say the same thing.
Jay
Glad you brought that up Sam. I was going to say the same thing.
Jay
|
By
Jay Scheevel
·
#52306
·
|
|
Re: W and B
Chris,
Let me know if you want me to calculate your decalage from photos. Decalage will definitely impact how your airplane will fly at different CG loadings. If you want me to do that, please
Chris,
Let me know if you want me to calculate your decalage from photos. Decalage will definitely impact how your airplane will fly at different CG loadings. If you want me to do that, please
|
By
Jay Scheevel
·
#52305
·
|
|
Re: O-200 with very low hours 80ish had prop strike but supposed to have no Crank damage. 4,000$
Continental crankshafts are tempered harder than Lycoming crankshafts. They are less likely to deform in a prop strike when compared to that of a Lycoming crankshaft. There is a familiar saying that
Continental crankshafts are tempered harder than Lycoming crankshafts. They are less likely to deform in a prop strike when compared to that of a Lycoming crankshaft. There is a familiar saying that
|
By
britmcman99
·
#52304
·
|
|
Re: W and B
My battery is where Bruce mounted his.
Jerry
My battery is where Bruce mounted his.
Jerry
|
By
Jerry Marstall
·
#52303
·
|
|
Re: W and B
One of our TriQ 200s had a 9 lb weight way back in the tail. When flown with two people it had and almost uncontrollable PIO! The 9 lb weight was removed and the battery was moved forward to just
One of our TriQ 200s had a 9 lb weight way back in the tail. When flown with two people it had and almost uncontrollable PIO! The 9 lb weight was removed and the battery was moved forward to just
|
By
Bruce Crain
·
#52302
·
|
|
Re: O-200 with very low hours 80ish had prop strike but supposed to have no Crank damage. 4,000$
It's not just the crankshaft flange runout that requires inspection after a prop strike. Per Continental the engine should be torn down and properly inspected.
Sam
It's not just the crankshaft flange runout that requires inspection after a prop strike. Per Continental the engine should be torn down and properly inspected.
Sam
|
By
Sam Hoskins
·
#52301
·
|
|
Re: O-200 with very low hours 80ish had prop strike but supposed to have no Crank damage. 4,000$
Brain I would be interested in the O-200. Please PM me at 251 three 77 five two one six.
Victor Taylor
Irvington Alabama
Brain I would be interested in the O-200. Please PM me at 251 three 77 five two one six.
Victor Taylor
Irvington Alabama
|
By
victor taylor
·
#52300
·
|
|
Re: O-200 with very low hours 80ish had prop strike but supposed to have no Crank damage. 4,000$
I would never ask for a finders fee for helping someone sell their plane or project.
Corbin
--
Corbin
N121CG
I would never ask for a finders fee for helping someone sell their plane or project.
Corbin
--
Corbin
N121CG
|
By
Corbin <c_geiser@...>
·
#52299
·
|
|
O-200 with very low hours 80ish had prop strike but supposed to have no Crank damage. 4,000$
Wanted to see if I could get a little finder's fee for this 0-200. Guy is clearing out his hanger and said his 0-200 has around 80 original hours had a propstrike from a ground loop when he was
Wanted to see if I could get a little finder's fee for this 0-200. Guy is clearing out his hanger and said his 0-200 has around 80 original hours had a propstrike from a ground loop when he was
|
By
Brian Hutchinson
·
#52298
·
Edited
|
|
Re: W and B
something over 24 lbs with the rack/hold down.
something over 24 lbs with the rack/hold down.
|
By
Frankenbird Vern
·
#52297
·
|
|
Re: W and B
Jay---------- Great video. I followed Reg when I installed the 1.8 turbo in my Dragonfly. 750 hrs airframe and 550 Subaru. Still works great, but you always want more. I have a video on
Jay---------- Great video. I followed Reg when I installed the 1.8 turbo in my Dragonfly. 750 hrs airframe and 550 Subaru. Still works great, but you always want more. I have a video on
|
By
Chris Walterson
·
#52296
·
|
|
Re: W and B
Charlie---------- I have as much in the back as I can. The rad is under the belly as far back as the split line.
I am using a 430 CC amp 17 lb battery installed behind the passenger seat, but
Charlie---------- I have as much in the back as I can. The rad is under the belly as far back as the split line.
I am using a 430 CC amp 17 lb battery installed behind the passenger seat, but
|
By
Chris Walterson
·
#52295
·
|
|
Re: W and B
Charlie has a valid point, Chris. I'll have the same issue with Frankenbird so you'll have company with this revision. As Charlie points out.. we don't really NEED a heavier battery for the Corvair
Charlie has a valid point, Chris. I'll have the same issue with Frankenbird so you'll have company with this revision. As Charlie points out.. we don't really NEED a heavier battery for the Corvair
|
By
Frankenbird Vern
·
#52294
·
|
|
Re: W and B
Hi Chris,
Not sure I can visualize what you are describing below, but no mind. Maybe after Saturday I will understand. In the meantime, here is a little inspiration video for you. Same plane, same
Hi Chris,
Not sure I can visualize what you are describing below, but no mind. Maybe after Saturday I will understand. In the meantime, here is a little inspiration video for you. Same plane, same
|
By
Jay Scheevel
·
#52293
·
|
|
Re: Chris Walterson Q-2 Q-Tour - in progress - July 10 9:00 Central time
Great idea, Sam, Chris, and all.
Can't wait!
That side exhaust looks like a tiny turboprop. :)
Great idea, Sam, Chris, and all.
Can't wait!
That side exhaust looks like a tiny turboprop. :)
|
By
Anthony P
·
#52292
·
|