Bob, I believe the Tri Q plans recommend 1.5 deg. up incidence. Do you know if this was done? I raised mine 2 degrees and this was not any too much. Wish I would have gone more. Lynn French Tri Q200

Bob My comments about ground handling refer to the tail dragger. The rest of it probably fits both types.. Peter _____ From: Q-LIST@... [mailto:Q-LIST@...] On Behalf

let me know how $$$ Quoting Bob Moehlenkamp <bobmoeh@...>:

Bob, I followed some advice from a certain "expert" and raised my canard by 0.5 deg. It was not a good idea. Built to plans the wing and canard will not be causing drag offset. It will be best to

Terry Crouch was kind enough to fly to Ankeny this morning to help me try to diagnose the flutter issue. After much discussion, we ascertained that the flutter may have been caused by excessive

If anyone is interested, I have a Virgin Ratray (SP) Cowling (I think). It's set on the shelf long enough. Contact me offlist and I'll get some pixs. Make offer. I'm sure it's worth more to someone

Thanks Richard, I'll be able to measure my Q2 cowl and come up with the difference. Regards rene Richard Thomson <richard@...> wrote: Hi Rene, Mine is 25 . 75 inches from

Richard, Not sure if I understand your question, but here goes. Install the elevators onto the plane. Do not connect any linkages to the elevators. Secure all bolts and make proper spacing with

While we are on the subject Guys, what is the best way to obtain the balance weight of the elevators ? With a spring balance at the TE ?? Richard Thomson Weston s Mare , UK Tri-Q 200

Hi Rene, Mine is 25 . 75 inches from the inside face of the cowl at the prop end to the edge that abuts the fuselage. It is fitted with a prop extension, which I think is 5 " . Richard

re cutting Plexiglass: One of the guys in our EAA group cut his canopy with a "cast saw" -- Doctor's tool for cutting off casts. The blade vibrates back and forth, doesn't spin. Could you borrow

I showed the photos and message thread to Scott Swing. He comments that the control system failure in this manner would be very difficult to re-establish control and any airspeed. Count

Thanks to all of you who have contacted me on and off line. Looks like I can get #20 from Bob F. or Sam K. Sam, we will not be at the ranch this weekend. Father Day will be in the Bay

Hi Jim and Sam I have #20 and if you want to I could fax the pages to you. Raoul --- dmperry1012@... wrote: From: Mike Perry <dmperry1012@...> To: Q-LIST@... Subject: Re:

Does anyone know what the difference in length is between the Q-200 cowl and Q-2 cowl. Thanks Rene Q2 C-FBWV --------------------------------- All new Yahoo! Mail

Thanks Allan, you're right of course, I meant to say the main tank has a tunnel in it. Dave Chalmers TriQ200 N4016G 250hrs Redmond WA

I used the same single torque tube to the ailerons as shown in the plans. Therefore, the dual controls had no effect on how the reflexor was designed. Jerry Marstall Sebastian Harren wrote:

Hi guys, does anyone have dual side sticks in combination with a reflexor and did you have to modify the dual side stick plans to make it work. (shorter torque tube to ailerons thus higher

Header tank? Allan F

I can't send newsletter 20 quickly. I could probably photocopy and mail this weekend. I see Sam K. chimed in -- let me know if you can't get it from him or someone at LVK -- Bob Farnum or one of