The motel told me 48 hr cnx notice. 24 would sure be better. Jerry

Hi Jay I haven't made any plans for presentations, but you would be more than welcome to set one up. The EAA building is small and I have a flat screen TV that could be used. Last year Mike Bergen

Looking forward to seeing you Jay. Jerry Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID "jay@... [Q-LIST]" <Q-LIST@...> wrote: Hi Dave,I have booked airline tickets to Hartford,

Hi Dave,I have booked airline tickets to Hartford, and will rent a car and drive to Orange. I also booked a room from Thursday night, so I will be on hand to help you set things up on Friday if you

Friends, For the pastthree years we’ve been very fortunate to have our CONTACT! Magazine annualfly-in hosted by the fine people at the Golden West Fly-in (MarysvilleCalifornia), who rolled out

This is getting exciting. J

Haven't hit my blog yet, but today I finally started the engine! Yes! I pushed it out and tied the tail to my car, per Sam. The first time I tried to start it, when I pushed the button, there was

QUICKIE2 PROJECT ON A TRAILER • $3,000 • FOR IMMEDIATE SALE • Quickie Q2 kit on a trailer, complete including all parts, plans, engine, fastened down and ready to go. Forward and rear wings plus

Correction 1980

So the answer to why the Dragonfly has so much more wing area is simply 'because that's what Bob Walters wanted'? If so, I can live with that answer. Dave -- Thank you for your time, ɘvɒⱭ

That would be 1981 at Oshkosh. Bob Johnson, Ogden, Utah

Dave, Why? The Q1 inspired the Q2 and the Dragonfly. They were designed at the same time by different designers who were unaware of each other's activities. Jaws dropped at Oshkosh in 1989 and the

"The Dragonfly has approximately 2 times the wing area" Why? Is it that much heavier? Or is Dragonfly just allergic to QAC's amount of wing loading? Dave -- Thank you for your time, ɘvɒⱭ

Jim, Lots of options and the Q started it all. Not trying to take anything away from the Q design. We all know the Dragonfly design comes from the Q1 design. You have to admit big guys fit better in

While Scaling anything up, will affect the Drag, and Weight, of the Aircraft, you can compensatefor it, with using lighter weight materials(Carbon vs Fiberglass), and addingHP. Since these Q2/Q200s

While scaling any thing up, will affect the Drag, and Weight, of theAircraft, you can compensate for it, with using lighter weight materials(Carbonvs Fiberglass), and adding HP. Since these Q2s were

Dave,All that said, there is no beating a Q200/0200 for fast, efficient performance. Not your daddy's airplane! And further, the Q200 is a much sleeker design that the Dragonfly because of the

Dave, The Dragonfly has approximately 2 times the wing area, up pops that drag thing again. The Dragonfly has a lower wing loading and a lower power loading. A O-200 will take the airframe to max

I think I would get tired of seeing the same old scene off my left wingtip... Dave