Jon, don't listen to those people who say it's a wood prop so it's probably OK. Looking at hat break, its pretty evident that the engine was spinning pretty fast when the prop strike happened. There

Here’s an update on my project to restore Earnest Martin’s Tri-Q200 back into service. I managed to get an engine crane, lift the engine (w/plane attached), remove the bottom cowl as well as

Obscured by tornados. But I could see Russia. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

Jerry, I'm proud of you. Hey, could you see the mountains of Illinois? Sam Sent via wireless gizmo. On Oct 24, 2014 7:06 PM, "jnmarstall jnmarstall@... [Q-LIST]" <Q-LIST@...> wrote:

UL 3300, does anyone have performance numbers with the 3300? In a Q200? Or would that be a Q -3300? Heck, how about a Q 360?

Great flight report. Do some video of the beautiful scenery there! On Oct 24, 2014 8:03 PM, "jnmarstall jnmarstall@... [Q-LIST]" <Q-LIST@...> wrote:

Like it!!

AWESOME day to FLY. High thin cirrus, unlimited visibility (very rare for here. Could see the mountains of GA, SC, TN, VA from Western NC). Also winds light and variable and as smooth as silk. "How

Both true. But the LS1 design was done wirh an 0-200A as the engine. The GU was designed with the Revmaster. Mike Dwyer My YouTube channel: http://goo.gl/ddljYZ My Vimeo Videos:

Hi. I thought that they changed from GU to LS1 due to contamination issues not because of lack of strength. The LS1 requires the carbon spar only because it is too thin to be strong enough without it

The LS1 came about to correct the issues with the GU in flight the only reason we have found for the extra bracing was due to the was the LS1 was built but do have one of the last GU's I think because

 Well, it has always been my understanding that theLS1 was developed to give the canard more elevator authority in order tohandle the extra weight of the 0-200. The GU is undoubtedly able to handle

Richard I just had my Bendix dual mag on my Revmaster overhauled and updated last year by Executive Air in Florida. Nice people. Dave Dugas Sent from Windows Mail From: pilothicks1@... [Q-LIST] Sent:

Just food for thought here. QAC advertised the Q as being 490 empty weight 1000 lbs gross we all know those numbers to be way off as the average empty weight of a Q2 is 690 empty no mater of power

You are correct it was not done with the 0-200 that I have info on it was done with the C-85 and C-90. I believe I still have the info or it is part of the stuff I shipped to Dan. But no less the

That's twice now that I read a 0-200A can be used with a GU canard. I do not think this is true. If I'm wrong I'd like to see the stress analysis study that shows such a heavy engine can be used.

That was my original thinking and I have always loved talking to Joe at Revmaster. He has always been very helpful and I do think he builds a great engine but I do want to move forward with technology

How about simply upgrading to the Revmaster 2331cc R2300? It's rated at an honest 85hp for takeoff and 80 continuous. Not as powerful as the UL, but half the price- and parts are available just about