24h.p. onan engine
jerry kennedy <jerrykennedy2001@...>
There is a 24 h.p. onan engine for sale phone
no.605-254-2599. He is asking $575.00 for it. I know nothing about it. Jerry kennedy ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
|
|
third test flight oops
Jerry Marstall <jnmarstall@...>
Guess our list doesn't take tables either.
J
|
|
Third test flight
Jerry Marstall <jnmarstall@...>
Some one asked about oil pressure after flight. Taxiing in it was 25psi.
Biggest Squawk - Heavy elevator forces. Discovered some contact of the right stick control rod against the main tank at aft stick deflection. Repositioned. Also will be checking the center elevator bearing on the left elevator - some play there. Haven't detected any other reasons for heavy (read - very heavy) stick forces. With elevators disconnected from one another, each moves easily. Connected, they move freely. Applied manual force to elevators, worked smoothly with full deflection. Checked sparrow settings against Earnest's plane - within 1 deg of his. The hunt goes on!! Feel free to weigh-in. N625JM Flight Tests Date 11/26/2007 11/28/2007 12/8/2007 Duration 0.6 1.3 1.4 Altitude (msl) Initial Flight 7500 5500 OAT No Data, 39 53 Density Alt Concentration -- 5910 RPM On Survival 2600 2650-2700 TAS (mph) 145 145 Manifold P 22 23 Oil Pressure 40 35 Oil Temp 210 210 GPH 6.6 7.1 CHT -- No 1 300 315 No 2 310 315 ? 250 No 3 370 370 No 4 360 325 Comments: 12/8/2007 Changed springs: continued heavy stick forces. Attempted stall. Couldn't get full elevator deflection. Did not stall, 900 fpm sink. Investigting. Rest of flight mirror image of previous. No 3 CHT dropped from 315 to 250 half way through flight. 11/28/2007 Straight and level, breaking in engine. Heavy stick forces. All else great 11/26/2007 Great to be flying again. Love the power. No surprises
|
|
Re: HI Qual Video
Great Job, Mike!? Have you tried to post anything yet on YouTube?? I put something up and it was pretty easy.? Perhaps you could edit something down to about 4 minutes and post it.? They take up to 100 Megs of upload and then do all the necessary compression work for you.? Isn't this high tech cool?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Cheers, Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Dwyer <mdwyer@...> To: Q-LIST@... <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 1:50 pm Subject: [Q-LIST] HI Qual Video Hey Guys, I've been messing with a video camera in my Q200. I recorded a takeoff from PIE, flight over Clearwater Beach FL and a landing. 38 minutes of 16x9 (wide screen) 720x 406 line (almost DVD quality) video with stereo sound. This file was compressed into a XviD type file and is now shared on the BitTorrent peer to peer network. The file is 465meg so no, I can't email it to you. The only practical way to get the file is to go to this web site: http://flymovie.tripod.com/ and download the torrent shortcut - please follow the right click directions! Go half way down the page and read how to get "Azureus" which is the program that handles the downloading. With a high-speed interconnect account and a few people sharing the file you should be able to download the file in a few hours...With a dial up account, don't even try. This video is on a bright hazy day and I had no polarizing filter and the camera mount shakes too much (all of which I'm working on) so it's just ok quality, still if your building it may be an incentive to get er done! You could use Nero to convert the video to a DVD if you wish. Mike Q200 N3QP ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003
|
|
HI Qual Video
Mike Dwyer <mdwyer@...>
Hey Guys,
I've been messing with a video camera in my Q200. I recorded a takeoff from PIE, flight over Clearwater Beach FL and a landing. 38 minutes of 16x9 (wide screen) 720x 406 line (almost DVD quality) video with stereo sound. This file was compressed into a XviD type file and is now shared on the BitTorrent peer to peer network. The file is 465meg so no, I can't email it to you. The only practical way to get the file is to go to this web site: http://flymovie.tripod.com/ and download the torrent shortcut - please follow the right click directions! Go half way down the page and read how to get "Azureus" which is the program that handles the downloading. With a high-speed interconnect account and a few people sharing the file you should be able to download the file in a few hours...With a dial up account, don't even try. This video is on a bright hazy day and I had no polarizing filter and the camera mount shakes too much (all of which I'm working on) so it's just ok quality, still if your building it may be an incentive to get er done! You could use Nero to convert the video to a DVD if you wish. Mike Q200 N3QP
|
|
Re: Sorry
Paul Buckley
The list will not accept attachments, Jerry......
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Paul B.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry Marstall To: Q-LIST@... Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 12:38 AM Subject: [Q-LIST] Sorry Sorry for the dupes, but for some reason the attach isn't coming through. I'll keep working on it. J ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1176 - Release Date: 06/12/2007 23:15
|
|
Sorry
Jerry Marstall <jnmarstall@...>
Sorry for the dupes, but for some reason the attach isn't coming through. I'll keep working on it.
J
|
|
[Fwd: [Fwd: Third Test Flight]]
Jerry Marstall <jnmarstall@...>
NEED I SAY MORE??????
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Re: Engine choices
Dennis Gentry
These engines and the Moller skycar should both be ready real soon now.
Dennis P.S. For the irony impaired, "I don't think either one will ever ship." On Dec 7, 2007 6:15 AM, Brian Bulaw <BrianBulaw@...> wrote: Chuck,
|
|
Third Test Flight
Jerry Marstall <jnmarstall@...>
NEED I SAY MORE??????
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
------------------------------------------------------------------------ **
|
|
Re: Motor fuel vs Epoxy
Peter Harris <peterjfharris@...>
Chuck
The Zoche has been in that status for at least 10 years. Must be a personality problem up there. It looks great on the website. Peter _____ From: Q-LIST@... [mailto:Q-LIST@...] On Behalf Of cburgoontrike3 Sent: Friday, 7 December 2007 6:44 PM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: [Q-LIST] Re: Motor fuel vs Epoxy Hi Jon, I'm in Germany now and will be going to Munich tomorrow. I hoped to see the Zoche engine, but when I talked to the guy (through a translator) he said it would be a few more years before he's finished. So close, but so far. http://www.zoche. <http://www.zoche.de/specs.html> de/specs.html Chuck Also check out: http://www.amtonlin <http://www.amtonline.com/publication/article.jsp?id=4434&pubId=1> e.com/publication/article.jsp?id=4434&pubId=1 --- In Q-LIST@yahoogroups. <mailto:Q-LIST%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Jon Finley" <jon@...> wrote: many details available about it yet. The biggest downside of the autodiesel is that the electronics are reportedly incredibly complex - even tothe point of making modern day EFI engines looks simple.[mailto:Q-LIST@yahoogroups. <mailto:Q-LIST%40yahoogroups.com> com]On Behalf Of viggenbuilder2which 4.5 litres is approx 1 english gallon, so that makes it almost twiceyou get a better mileage return that makes it cheaper overall. I wouldsame as the Q2 cowl footprint, but it has the advantage of being quite a12/2/2007 8:34 PM [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Engine choices
cburgoontrike3 <CBurgoon@...>
Hi Brian,
Yes, Others have said the same thing. I prefer the Gemini 100 anyway. But it's the same sort of deal I'm afraid. I like the concept a lot. http://www.amtonline.com/publication/article.jsp?id=4434&pubId=1 Chuck --- In Q-LIST@..., "Brian Bulaw" <BrianBulaw@...> wrote: Behalf Of cburgoontrike3
|
|
Engine choices
Brian Bulaw <BrianBulaw@...>
Chuck,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Don't waste your time considering Zoche. I also called him using a translator in 1990. Then he was about 6 months away. Brian Bulaw N24H - Q2 converting to Jabiru 3300
-----Original Message-----
From: Q-LIST@... [mailto:Q-LIST@...] On Behalf Of cburgoontrike3 Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 3:44 AM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: [Q-LIST] Re: Motor fuel vs Epoxy Hi Jon, I'm in Germany now and will be going to Munich tomorrow. I hoped to see the Zoche engine, but when I talked to the guy (through a translator) he said it would be a few more years before he's finished. So close, but so far. http://www.zoche. <http://www.zoche.de/specs.html> de/specs.html Chuck
|
|
Re: Motor fuel vs Epoxy
cburgoontrike3 <CBurgoon@...>
Hi Jon,
I'm in Germany now and will be going to Munich tomorrow. I hoped to see the Zoche engine, but when I talked to the guy (through a translator) he said it would be a few more years before he's finished. So close, but so far. http://www.zoche.de/specs.html Chuck Also check out: http://www.amtonline.com/publication/article.jsp?id=4434&pubId=1 --- In Q-LIST@..., "Jon Finley" <jon@...> wrote: many details available about it yet. The biggest downside of the autodiesel is that the electronics are reportedly incredibly complex - even tothe point of making modern day EFI engines looks simple.Behalf Of viggenbuilder2which 4.5 litres is approx 1 english gallon, so that makes it almost twiceyou get a better mileage return that makes it cheaper overall. I wouldsame as the Q2 cowl footprint, but it has the advantage of being quite a12/2/2007 8:34 PM
|
|
Wing Shape
murojd <murojd@...>
I am a Machanical Engineer student at drexel and I am very interested in the Q2. There is a
old plane locally for sale. One of my projects at drexel is to do stress anyalisis on the Q2 canard with landing gear. If I can produce a good model I will be able to produce a dynamic stress plot showing the stress on the entire wing and wheel on landing. I will also be able to determine at what vertical velocity the wing will fail. I have found the plans on how the wing is made, but I do not have the foam core shape. If anyone could give me the dimensions at the wing tip and root I might be able to build a accurate model. I would also be happy to share the results on the message board. So my question is does anyone have the dimensions for the foam at the canard tip and the root? thanks very much, John
|
|
Shamless promotion - stuff on Ebay
A am redoing my instrument panel and am selling some stuff on Ebay. Right
now I have a NAV/COM, vacuum system parts and engine instruments listed. I think you should be able to find them here: http://motors.search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZsammyq2 Regards, Sam Hoskins Murphysboro, IL
|
|
Re: Type aproval SA CAA
John ten
Bernhart,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
There are probably several ways to skin this cat. Do you have an experimental category or does each new airframe have to be fully certified? If they are already flying in SA, consider building a Q2 (at least for official purposes) and explore the options for modification / engine upgrade later on. If Qxs do not exist in SA, consider building a scratch built Bernhart CAIA 1 - (which will bear an uncanny resemblance to the Q series). It may be that indigenous designs get more lenient treatment. (Resist any temptation to paint it black, however..;-)) There is a very active contributor on Canard aviators group (Chris van Hoof from Memory) who has built and flown a cozy in South Africa who may well be able to give you location specific advice. One of my previous South African employees was an active homebuilder before coming to Australia and I recall that he had flown in an auto- conversion powered homebuilt, so it is possible. I will give him a call and see if he can shed any light on the subject. Remember the usual rule of thumb, A new aircraft cannot fly until the weight of the paperwork equals the MAUW Regards John
--- In Q-LIST@..., "Bernhardt" <bernhardt.jansen@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Type aproval SA CAA
Bernhardt
We have two flying Q's in the country, and the molds were pulled from
the one in 1996 prior to construction started. The owner did that because at the time concidered building another, and with QAC closed over 10 years earlier didn't think anyone would complain... He got the original kit somewhare from a barnyard sale in '95. I have done some more ivestigation about the data required, and any thing FAR 23 related could be useful. Bernhardt Q200.....If all goes well --- In Q-LIST@..., "Doug Humble" <hawkidoug@...> wrote: fuselage molds???
|
|
Re: Type aproval SA CAA
Doug Humble <hawkidoug@...>
Just curious, where does someone from South Africa come by Q2 fuselage molds???
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Doug "Hawkeye" Humble A Sign Above www.asignabove.net Omaha NE N25974
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernhardt To: Q-LIST@... Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 5:10 AM Subject: [Q-LIST] Type aproval SA CAA Hi All I can not say that I am new to this list, but it is definately the first time I'm posting anything (been on the side line for almost a year now) As All of us when we're starting a new project I am very enthusiastick, just wanting to get in , and go, but a friend of mine advised me to first contact our South African CAA, to accuire a builder number, since he had endless trouble getting his project registered, and eventually a prooving flight authority. So I followed his advice, and went to see our CAA, who told me that they have no data about the Q200, and hence will not be able to issue me with a builder number unless I can supply them with the neccesary data, this includes wing loading tests, control strenght data bla.bla..bla and a whole archive full of everything???, which I have no idea where to find. The way they made it sound was just short of certification, but I want to give it a go anyway, and will really apretiate any help/data I can get my hands on. My project will be a scratch build, since I have the fuselage moulds, templates, plans, an excelent Mentor....the whole nine yards, except the back-up from the local authoroty. Please help!! Bernhardt Q200......If all goes well.
|
|
Type aproval SA CAA
Bernhardt
Hi All
I can not say that I am new to this list, but it is definately the first time I'm posting anything (been on the side line for almost a year now) As All of us when we're starting a new project I am very enthusiastick, just wanting to get in , and go, but a friend of mine advised me to first contact our South African CAA, to accuire a builder number, since he had endless trouble getting his project registered, and eventually a prooving flight authority. So I followed his advice, and went to see our CAA, who told me that they have no data about the Q200, and hence will not be able to issue me with a builder number unless I can supply them with the neccesary data, this includes wing loading tests, control strenght data bla.bla..bla and a whole archive full of everything???, which I have no idea where to find. The way they made it sound was just short of certification, but I want to give it a go anyway, and will really apretiate any help/data I can get my hands on. My project will be a scratch build, since I have the fuselage moulds, templates, plans, an excelent Mentor....the whole nine yards, except the back-up from the local authoroty. Please help!! Bernhardt Q200......If all goes well.
|
|