Date   

Weber DCOE40 carbs, T4 hydraulic cams...

Chris Adkins <ccadkins@...>
 

Anybody out there got any experience with the following:

Hydraulic cams in VWs (specifically Type IVs).

Weber DCOE 40 carb in an AC application.

Thanks for any comments!


Re: Tires

Mike Dwyer <mdwyer@...>
 

This was sent out a short time ago:

I know where you can get those "lamb" Cheng Shin tires for 13.75 each
including tube plus shipping if you can lower yourself to buy stuff from
the EZ guys. (we use the same tires, motors, etc.) I just bought some
and he sent them right out no problem. His address is Boatfly@...

Bounds

----- Original Message -----
From: <mnomady@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 8:36 PM
Subject: [Q-LIST] Tires


It seems my Q2 tires need to be replaced, and I would guess they are
the original Cheng Shin's. They are 4.00-5's, but larger than the 11"
ones they have at Aircraft Spruce. Does anyone have a recent source
for these tires/tubes, or an equivalent replacement?

Thanks,
Mark


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html




Re: Room available (maybe)

Jeremy Prizevoits <JerryPrize@...>
 

I will have an extra reservation for Friday and Sat. night.
It's at the econolodge.
Contact me directly and I'll make arrangements to give you the hook up!
See you soon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Hoskins [mailto:shoskins@...]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 6:54 AM
To: QBA
Subject: [Q-LIST] Room available (maybe)

I just cancelled a smoking room at the Days Inn, in Ottowa.

Call them direct to see if it's still available.

1-785-242-4842



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html


Ottawa

Jon Finley <finley@...>
 

Hi all,

I'm sure nobody wants to think about this, however; I thought it only fair
to warn you southern folks - better bring your coat. The highs for this
weekend are forecasted to be less than 50 degrees. I guess we did change
the date hoping for cooler temps - well, we got 'em! :-)

Jon


Room available (maybe)

Sam Hoskins <shoskins@...>
 

I just cancelled a smoking room at the Days Inn, in Ottowa.

Call them direct to see if it's still available.

1-785-242-4842


Re: Tires

Sam Hoskins <shoskins@...>
 

I use Lamb tires. I get them from Wicks and Aircraft Spruce.

mnomady@... wrote:

It seems my Q2 tires need to be replaced, and I would guess they are
the original Cheng Shin's. They are 4.00-5's, but larger than the 11"
ones they have at Aircraft Spruce. Does anyone have a recent source
for these tires/tubes, or an equivalent replacement?

Thanks,
Mark

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html


Re: Tires

James Postma <james@...>
 

Mark,

Try a glider supply store like www.desser.com

James Postma
james@...
(253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice

----- Original Message -----
From: <mnomady@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 5:36 PM
Subject: [Q-LIST] Tires


It seems my Q2 tires need to be replaced, and I would guess they are
the original Cheng Shin's. They are 4.00-5's, but larger than the 11"
ones they have at Aircraft Spruce. Does anyone have a recent source
for these tires/tubes, or an equivalent replacement?

Thanks,
Mark


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html


Re: GU Canard Wax

Michael D. Callahan <micallahan@...>
 

Jim,
I'd be interested in a nice big juicy rudder! Mike C.

----- Original Message -----
From: James Postma <james@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] GU Canard Wax


Jim,

Thanks for the input. Two things seem to need addressing.

One is the instability or lack thereof. I wonder if your tailwheel mod
affects it. No doubt the more conventional tailwheel arrangement does
change the steering characteristics. The Qbirds are somewhat unique in
the
tailwheel configuration and yours is actually more conventional. All
other
taildraggers (at least the certified ones) I have seen use a system
similar
to yours. Maybe Dave can shed some light on the theory here.
But it is well proven both in theory and practice that the negative camber
produces directional instability in both autos and airplanes. The Me -109
is the best (worst) example of this with something like -6 degrees. Saw a
restored version fly at Chino last year. It is known to be so squirrely
that they flew in a pilot from England to fly it. It also lands slower
that
our Q birds.

The other consideration is how to control it without running off the
runway.
You choose to use powerful differential braking and maybe the tailwheel
mod
dampens it. I use an enlarged rudder. Some use reverse aileron steering.
I am quite happy with control now as my rudder power is equal to the
tailwheel steering. With the original small rudder, whenever I hit a
bump
I lost directional control. Now I have excellent control in wheel or tail
down modes. Incidentally, the rudder is a design by Frank Folmer and I
could probably get him to provide the plans if anyone is interested. It
always has baffled me why the designers put such a small rudder on a
taildragger. Every other one has a rudder sized for ground handling. I
was
agast when I found out about the differential yaw approach, but my hat is
off to those that are successful with it. You probably are not familiar
with Frank Folmer as he does not fly much and is not on the computer. He
is
one of the finest builders and designers that I know. I probably would
have
given up and sold my bird if it was not for his valuable assistance.

Different strokes for different folks.


James Postma
james@...
(253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Patillo" <patillo@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] GU Canard Wax


James,

I beg to differ! I have several thousand hours flying time,
X-Navy, United Airlines and many different types of AC and I'm here to
dispel what your saying. My plane behaves just like any other tail dragger
possibly even easier to handle especially in cross winds. I have not made
"The Gall Mod" and don't intend to. It may be "that mod" is a patch
covering
up more serious problems with the airframe itself. Bob Farnum and I keep
telling anyone one interested that there a few mods that make these
aircraft
takeoff, land and fly beautifully and docile! New builders just realize
there is another side to this story. Build your plane to the latest plans
available, make the few necessary mods and go have a blast!

Regards,

Jim Patillo Q200 N46JP



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html




Tires

mnomady@...
 

It seems my Q2 tires need to be replaced, and I would guess they are
the original Cheng Shin's. They are 4.00-5's, but larger than the 11"
ones they have at Aircraft Spruce. Does anyone have a recent source
for these tires/tubes, or an equivalent replacement?

Thanks,
Mark


Have room, need roomie.

JAMES MASAL
 

Have a double room reserved in Ottawa for Fri and Sat nites anybody want to
share the room and expenses?

MCONLIN@...


Re: Axle locations

terry.l.sickler@...
 

Haven't been there yet, but I have flown at 1150 lbs and the rate of climb
was still about 950- to 1000. That's from Denver altitudes. I actually would
develop slightly more than 100hp at sea level because of high compression
pistons. It is only putting out about 70% of it's rated hp at this altitude.
~T~

-----Original Message-----
From: James Postma [mailto:james@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 1:24 PM
To: Q-LIST@...
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Axle locations


Terry,

HOw badly does your performance (climb and cruise speed) change at 1250? I
assume you are running 100 HP.

James Postma
james@...
(253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice
----- Original Message -----
From: <terry.l.sickler@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 3:21 PM
Subject: RE: [Q-LIST] Axle locations


No sir, my Q-200 gross weight is 1250#. Many others are also. Watch your
W&B
and you'll be fine. I had to put half of the junk in my hangar in the
cockpit to get it there. ~T~

-----Original Message-----
From: Woody Sulloway [mailto:sulloway@...]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 3:19 PM
To: Q-LIST@...
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Axle locations


Terry,
Was your 1250# Gross Weight a typo? I was thinking that a Q200 was 1100.
What am I missing here., or was that a test weight?

Regards

Woody


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html


Re: Axle locations

James Postma <james@...>
 

Terry,

HOw badly does your performance (climb and cruise speed) change at 1250? I
assume you are running 100 HP.

James Postma
james@...
(253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice

----- Original Message -----
From: <terry.l.sickler@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 3:21 PM
Subject: RE: [Q-LIST] Axle locations


No sir, my Q-200 gross weight is 1250#. Many others are also. Watch your
W&B
and you'll be fine. I had to put half of the junk in my hangar in the
cockpit to get it there. ~T~

-----Original Message-----
From: Woody Sulloway [mailto:sulloway@...]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 3:19 PM
To: Q-LIST@...
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Axle locations


Terry,
Was your 1250# Gross Weight a typo? I was thinking that a Q200 was 1100.
What am I missing here., or was that a test weight?

Regards

Woody


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html


Re: Type Canard

terry.l.sickler@...
 

Robert, The existence of elevator counter-balances does not stipulate the
wing. They could have been added to a GU easily. The below listed method is
a much better method...short of a set of templates. ~T~

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Richardson [mailto:dave@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 10:47 AM
To: Q-LIST@...
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Type Canard


One way you can tell which canard you have is to run your hand along
the bottom of the elevator portion of the canard fore to aft. The GU will
be fairly flat. The LS1 will be distinctly concave on the bottom.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Justin" <flywarrior@...>


Re: (Gross Weight)

terry.l.sickler@...
 

The Q will cure you of that! We have the "Need for Speed". ~T~

-----Original Message-----
From: Woody Sulloway [mailto:sulloway@...]

Terry,
Thanks for the reply. I was referring specifically to the Q-200! I would
be generally be operating in the flatlands, but then you have those hot
days! I'm trying to close a deal on selling my Cherokee at the moment
and I hope there is a Q-200 in my future. The thing is I like radios and
gadgets!

Regards

Woody


Re: GU Canard Wax

James Postma <james@...>
 

Jim,

Thanks for the input. Two things seem to need addressing.

One is the instability or lack thereof. I wonder if your tailwheel mod
affects it. No doubt the more conventional tailwheel arrangement does
change the steering characteristics. The Qbirds are somewhat unique in the
tailwheel configuration and yours is actually more conventional. All other
taildraggers (at least the certified ones) I have seen use a system similar
to yours. Maybe Dave can shed some light on the theory here.
But it is well proven both in theory and practice that the negative camber
produces directional instability in both autos and airplanes. The Me -109
is the best (worst) example of this with something like -6 degrees. Saw a
restored version fly at Chino last year. It is known to be so squirrely
that they flew in a pilot from England to fly it. It also lands slower that
our Q birds.

The other consideration is how to control it without running off the runway.
You choose to use powerful differential braking and maybe the tailwheel mod
dampens it. I use an enlarged rudder. Some use reverse aileron steering.
I am quite happy with control now as my rudder power is equal to the
tailwheel steering. With the original small rudder, whenever I hit a bump
I lost directional control. Now I have excellent control in wheel or tail
down modes. Incidentally, the rudder is a design by Frank Folmer and I
could probably get him to provide the plans if anyone is interested. It
always has baffled me why the designers put such a small rudder on a
taildragger. Every other one has a rudder sized for ground handling. I was
agast when I found out about the differential yaw approach, but my hat is
off to those that are successful with it. You probably are not familiar
with Frank Folmer as he does not fly much and is not on the computer. He is
one of the finest builders and designers that I know. I probably would have
given up and sold my bird if it was not for his valuable assistance.

Different strokes for different folks.


James Postma
james@...
(253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Patillo" <patillo@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] GU Canard Wax


James,

I beg to differ! I have several thousand hours flying time,
X-Navy, United Airlines and many different types of AC and I'm here to
dispel what your saying. My plane behaves just like any other tail dragger
possibly even easier to handle especially in cross winds. I have not made
"The Gall Mod" and don't intend to. It may be "that mod" is a patch covering
up more serious problems with the airframe itself. Bob Farnum and I keep
telling anyone one interested that there a few mods that make these aircraft
takeoff, land and fly beautifully and docile! New builders just realize
there is another side to this story. Build your plane to the latest plans
available, make the few necessary mods and go have a blast!

Regards,

Jim Patillo Q200 N46JP


Re: Type Canard

Dave Richardson <dave@...>
 

One way you can tell which canard you have is to run your hand along
the bottom of the elevator portion of the canard fore to aft. The GU will
be fairly flat. The LS1 will be distinctly concave on the bottom.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Justin" <flywarrior@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 10:30 PM
Subject: [Q-LIST] Type Canard


My Q-2 has the canard assembly which has counter weights on the elevator
control shaft. I an not sure if it needs vortex generators installed on it?
I am also interested in knowning what type conard this is considered.






To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html



Re: (Gross Weight)

Woody Sulloway <sulloway@...>
 

Terry,
Thanks for the reply. I was referring specifically to the Q-200! I would
be generally be operating in the flatlands, but then you have those hot
days! I'm trying to close a deal on selling my Cherokee at the moment
and I hope there is a Q-200 in my future. The thing is I like radios and
gadgets!

Regards

Woody


Re: (Gross Weight)

terry.l.sickler@...
 

Woody,
I wouldn't even think of increasing the gross weight on a Q-2. Ask Jon
Finley how it feels to only be able to get the bird to 5000' and try to fly
west from the central USA. However, the LS-1 canard coupled with the O-200
on the Q-200 is very a capable machine. We have flown with them with two
220# guys on hot days at Ottawa without problems...regularly. My Q-200's
empty weight is 683# (with 5 qts oil and unusable fuel). I should be
producing a little over 100hp at sea level because I have high compression
pistons. During my tests, I have been seeing climb rates (from a 6000 ft
elevation airport) in the 1000 to 1100 fpm range with a take-off weight of
about 1000# (CG @ 70%). ~T~

-----Original Message-----
From: Woody Sulloway [mailto:sulloway@...]
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] (Gross Weight)

Terry,
1250 Sounds good to me! As you can se I'd been thinking 1100. I've been
trying to figure being able to put a couple of 200 pounders in there
with fuel so I figured I'd need to have a useful load of 550+ with fuel.
I suspect that I'd not need that other 200 lb seat most of the time, but
I wanted to be able to, if I wanted too,
What is your empty weight and how much stuff do you have (radios,
Vacuum, AH DG. +++) Are their any special considerations about the 1250
Gross that happen because of canard type?, Horsepower? Any thing else
I've not seen.

Woody


Re: (Gross Weight)

jtenhave@mets.mq.edu.au <jtenhave@...>
 

Woody,

if you want a hand with the weight and balance understanding I will be happy to help. It is not hard.
It is probably not of interest to everyone so off line is fine.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Woody Sulloway [SMTP:sulloway@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 9:27 AM
To: Q-LIST@...
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] (Gross Weight)


It looks like I need to find a primer on W&B. Having dealt with
certificated AC the Gross was always a given and derived by Voodoo.

Appreciate your help,

Woody


Re: GU Canard Wax

Michael D. Callahan <micallahan@...>
 

Along these lines, Dave Naumann was either "SuperYeager, Tailwheel
Driver Supreme" or this alignment thing is black magic. His wheels were
nowhere near right and he obviously managed to keep it going pointy end
first. Maybe it's just what you adapt to, like a dog born with three legs,
if you don't have any other experience you don't know how bad (or good) it
really is. Mike C.

----- Original Message -----
From: <BD5ER@...>
To: <Q-LIST@...>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] GU Canard Wax


In a message dated 10/1/00 9:14:54 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
finley@... writes:

<< For now, without information on how your
gear is set, we are forced to say "Yah sure, you just got lucky and got
the
gear alignment right the first time!".
>>
====================
Here are a couple of pics of a Q that is alleged to handle well. I
have
not flown in it yet but I have seen it in action and he didn't seem to
have
any problems. As you can see he has not done the "Gall" alignment and the
other side has a noticeably different amount of camber.
I was going to send you the pic of the wheel pant on the other list
today
but you can get it from the FTP location to show your aerodynamic guy if
you
want.

<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/bd5er/tailwheel.jpg">
http://members.aol.com/bd5er/tailwheel.jpg</A>
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/bd5er/wheel.jpg">
http://members.aol.com/bd5er/wheel.jpg</A>

"Think outside the box - but fly in the envelope"
<A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/bd5er/Qpage.html">Q-2 page</A>
Leon McAtee



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...

Quickie Builders Association WEB site
http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html