Re: Rough Revmaster
Robert M. Farnam <bfarnam@...>
Jon,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I run a fuel filter instead of a gascolator. I've never gotten water from the sump either. I don't like gascolators much. Bob F. N200QK Jon Finley wrote:
|
|
Re: Modifying the original Q2 brakes
Robert M. Farnam <bfarnam@...>
Doug,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I use the La Rue modification as published in the Sept/Oct '89 issue of Quicktalk. Jim Patillo also modified to those, and I think Sam Hoskins uses them. In my experience, they work very well. With a 3:1 mechanical ratio on my brake pedal (toe brakes), I can easily hold a full power runup. I tried floating the rotor first, but didn't like it so changed to the La Rue floating caliper. Bob F. HawkiDoug@... wrote:
|
|
Re: Modifying the original Q2 brakes
Sam Hoskins <shoskins@...>
The La Rue mod is in an old Quicktalk, look it up. I used it too and am
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
satisfied with the mount. Sam James Postma wrote:
|
|
Re: A simple STOL mod for Qs?
Hot Wings
In a message dated 9/12/00 6:33:23 PM Mountain Daylight Time, ed@...
writes: << Does this make sense to anyone else? >> ===================================== You may be on to something. If you look at the air pressure distribution map you will see that the computer program picked up some kind of flow in this area. Look real close here <A HREF="http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html">Quickie Builders Association Internet Home Page</A> at the elevator inboard. Another tip on these pressure distribution color maps - Cut and past to MS Paint and invert the colors. For some of us males with color perception problems this will reveal some of the more subtle changes. Perhaps to "seal" this gap you might use a vertical piece of .020" aluminum as a flow fence on the inboard end of the elevator? It would be easy to temporarily glue one on to test. "Think outside the box - but fly in the envelope" <A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/bd5er/Qpage.html">Q-2 page</A> Leon McAtee
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
James Postma <james@...>
Michael,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
150 HP is the potential of the top end at about 5,500 RPM but I have no intentions of trying for it as I state that the bottom end and the cooling will not hold up. My point is that the new "top stuff" is superior to the original, i.e. the wall thickness is increased actually decreasing the bore, but producing more HP and is cooler due to less flexing. If you pick up a copy of Hot VW's it has lots of stuff along this line and it works fine for aircraft at low cost. When I did the top the rpm went from 3100 to 3300 and speed from 140 to 150 mph. My next project is drag reduction mostly fit of canopy, speed brake, cowling etc. My actual intent is to go for 4,300 rpm and 85 HP direct drive. Need a new cam, prop and probably intake manifold for this. Anything more and I will look seriously at what the Corvair and Soob people are doing. James Postma james@... (253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael D. Callahan" <micallahan@...> To: <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 4:45 PM Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Rough Revmaster engine, 7000? Has this setup been dynoed? Mike C.the betterstuff. It is all new production built in Brazil or Mexico where theybuildthe complete car. Incidentally, all the parts cost $900. A little tthan a Lyc or Cont. That will not buy one cylinder with them.good nowthe Revmaster case will hold up, so I have modest expectations. I'monlyturning 3500 rpm. I plan to upgrade the cam and go to 4300 rpm if I can Revmasterand am due for a clearance check. Will keep you informed. The thehas a custom case and crankshaft. Everything else is stock VW.you bottom end will take.
|
|
Re: A VG question, sorry.
Jon Finley <finley@...>
Ed,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I'm 99.9% sure that QAC called for them to be located at 50% chord. However; the logic behind that is in question. Jim Price (Long-EZ and altitude record) has wind tunnel tested VG placement and found that 20% chord was optimal on his canard. Jon Finley Q1 N54JF - 1835cc VW Q2 N90MG - Subaru EA-81 DD Turbo Apple Valley, Minnesota http://63.90.191.136/Finley/finley-subaru.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Edward N. MacLeod [mailto:ed@...] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 11:14 AM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: [Q-LIST] A VG question, sorry. For you GU experts out there, a quick VG question: I noticed on the QBA site (http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html), the VGs should be located at the 50% chord. Another site shows them near the max thickness line, http://www.si-inc.com/dragonfly/dropbox/vg-place.gif Unfortunately I put mine at the latter location. Thanks for the feedback. Ed m To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Q-LIST-unsubscribe@... Quickie Builders Association WEB site http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
Royer, Michel <RoyerM@...>
James.......should of said rain and snow......far from Florida.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Up near Ottawa Ontario,Canada. Postcure was performed on the plane. Michel
----------
|
|
Re: Modifying the original Q2 brakes
James Postma <james@...>
Guys,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I have had a lot of trouble getting my floating calipers to run true and square. They are eating up the pads and disks and my brake action is poor. After I got the calipers to run a little better, the braking power went way down. The disks had been scored so I ground them smooth and put on new pads. The disks are bolted to the wheel. Now the tracking is O.K. and the pads are wearing O.K. but power is poor. Will the power get better as the disk gets scuffed up? I have a single master cylinder. They pull a little to one side but I can hold it with the rudder. I have a large rudder matched to the tailwheel in directional power. The system has been bled but they are still a little spongy. I'm not familiar with the floating disk. How is it done and why float both? Does anyone have more info on the La Rue mod? Unlike Jon, I do not have enough power on roll out. James Postma james@... (253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Patillo" <patillo@...> To: <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:22 AM Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Modifying the original Q2 brakes -------------------------------------------------------------------_-> and floated the calipers. When I began hi-speed taxi I didn't like the way the brakes felt and immediately installed the La Rue brake mod. This mod still floats the calipers with the discs bolted but on a much more beefy frame and much more squarely to the disc. By the way, I have 11.00 4.5 x 5 tires and the smallest wheel pants you can make. The caliper assy sticks out the side about 13/4" - 2", but fairs in nicely with a fiberglass molded cover. If you need the mod, its in a past issue of Quick Talk and the archives may have it. In my opinion, they work great and easily hold the airplane at 2,000 RPM or greater depending on how much you want to push on the pedals. recall which mods include which changes or where/when they were written up BUTI have both the floating caliper and floating disk on both my Q1 and Q2.I have found that there is a bit of tuning required to get both sides togrip with similar authority (I have a single master cylinder) but once thatis done they work fine. They do not have a tremendous amount of "force",the ground but have always delivered as much brake action as I needed duringthe super thin wheelpants!!brakes. I doold newsletters and found a couple of ways to do this. In issue 23 ofis anthan the
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
James Postma <james@...>
Michel,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Are you at all concerned about the long term effects on your fibreglass structure keeping it outside? Sounds like you are in Florida? James Postma james@... (253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice
----- Original Message -----
From: "Royer, Michel" <RoyerM@...> To: <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:42 AM Subject: RE: [Q-LIST] Rough Revmaster water either in the main or in my gascolator which is between the header and
|
|
A VG question, sorry.
Edward N. MacLeod <ed@...>
For you GU experts out there, a quick VG question:
I noticed on the QBA site (http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html), the VGs should be located at the 50% chord. Another site shows them near the max thickness line, http://www.si-inc.com/dragonfly/dropbox/vg-place.gif Unfortunately I put mine at the latter location. Thanks for the feedback. Ed m
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
James Postma <james@...>
I have an in-line filter per plans and also a gascolator. The filter
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
catches the dirt and the gascolator gets the water. Without it your engine would drown if any water gets in. I got a slug of water at Will Rogers AP in Oky City with my Bonanza from a fuel truck one time. They are mostly JetA and this truck had not been drained. It took me 3 fillups to get all the water out of the tanks, but the gascolator kept it running. I landed often and drained the gascolator. Hate to keep harping but the flyer with the rough engine really needs to check (change) that in-line filter often on a new system. James Postma james@... (253) 584-1182 9:00 to 8:00 PDT (GMT-8) voice
----- Original Message -----
From: "Royer, Michel" <RoyerM@...> To: <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:42 AM Subject: RE: [Q-LIST] Rough Revmaster water either in the main or in my gascolator which is between the header andremember there was more water in the tank that fuel!! :-)
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
Royer, Michel <RoyerM@...>
My plane has been outside for 3 years in rain and never had a drop of water
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
either in the main or in my gascolator which is between the header and carb... About the rough revmaster me and other guys found out that the mixture traveling of the arm was not going far enough.... Michel
----------
|
|
Re: Modifying the original Q2 brakes
James Patillo <patillo@...>
Doug,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I installed the disc brakes per specs with the disc bolted to the wheel and floated the calipers. When I began hi-speed taxi I didn't like the way the brakes felt and immediately installed the La Rue brake mod. This mod still floats the calipers with the discs bolted but on a much more beefy frame and much more squarely to the disc. By the way, I have 11.00 4.5 x 5 tires and the smallest wheel pants you can make. The caliper assy sticks out the side about 13/4" - 2", but fairs in nicely with a fiberglass molded cover. If you need the mod, its in a past issue of Quick Talk and the archives may have it. In my opinion, they work great and easily hold the airplane at 2,000 RPM or greater depending on how much you want to push on the pedals. Jim Patillo N46JP 13.5 hours N46JP Q200
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Finley To: Q-LIST@... Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:37 AM Subject: RE: [Q-LIST] Modifying the original Q2 brakes My Groups | Q-LIST Main Page | Start a new group! Hi Doug, Doesn't look like anyone is biting so I will take a stab. I don't recall which mods include which changes or where/when they were written up BUT I have both the floating caliper and floating disk on both my Q1 and Q2. I have found that there is a bit of tuning required to get both sides to grip with similar authority (I have a single master cylinder) but once that is done they work fine. They do not have a tremendous amount of "force", cannot hold the plane during a full throttle run-up, sometimes squeak on the ground but have always delivered as much brake action as I needed during roll out. My big complaint is the size of the brake unit. I envy those guys with the super thin wheelpants!! Jon Finley Q1 N54JF - 1835cc VW Q2 N90MG - Subaru EA-81 DD Turbo Apple Valley, Minnesota http://63.90.191.136/Finley/finley-subaru.html -----Original Message----- From: HawkiDoug@... [mailto:HawkiDoug@...] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 9:14 AM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: [Q-LIST] Modifying the original Q2 brakes I'm just now beginning to understand what is ment by "floating" brakes. I do not beleive mine have been modifided to do this. I was reviewing the old newsletters and found a couple of ways to do this. In issue 23 of Quicktalk I found an explaination of how to float the disk. In Q-talk #1 there is an explaination on how to float the calipers. Which way do most of you prefer? If I want to go back to the smaller tires someday, is one way better than the other? Thanks! Doug "Hawkeye" Humble Omaha NE To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Q-LIST-unsubscribe@... Quickie Builders Association WEB site http://web2.airmail.net/qba321tm/q-page1.html
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
Jon Finley <finley@...>
Which begs the question - how many guys are using a gascolator? I'm not and
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
never have in either of my Q's. BTW, I have never gotten any water from the sump EXCEPT for the time my cockpit filled with water during a HEAVY rainstorm at Ottawa. I remember there was more water in the tank that fuel!! :-) Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Q2FLYBOY@... [mailto:Q2FLYBOY@...] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 7:45 AM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Rough Revmaster Gascolator is bad. I hac the same problem 10yrs ago. Changed to car filter inside cockpit like plans and never had any trouble since, dave carlson
|
|
Re: Modifying the original Q2 brakes
Jon Finley <finley@...>
Hi Doug,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Doesn't look like anyone is biting so I will take a stab. I don't recall which mods include which changes or where/when they were written up BUT I have both the floating caliper and floating disk on both my Q1 and Q2. I have found that there is a bit of tuning required to get both sides to grip with similar authority (I have a single master cylinder) but once that is done they work fine. They do not have a tremendous amount of "force", cannot hold the plane during a full throttle run-up, sometimes squeak on the ground but have always delivered as much brake action as I needed during roll out. My big complaint is the size of the brake unit. I envy those guys with the super thin wheelpants!! Jon Finley Q1 N54JF - 1835cc VW Q2 N90MG - Subaru EA-81 DD Turbo Apple Valley, Minnesota http://63.90.191.136/Finley/finley-subaru.html
-----Original Message-----
From: HawkiDoug@... [mailto:HawkiDoug@...] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 9:14 AM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: [Q-LIST] Modifying the original Q2 brakes I'm just now beginning to understand what is ment by "floating" brakes. I do not beleive mine have been modifided to do this. I was reviewing the old newsletters and found a couple of ways to do this. In issue 23 of Quicktalk I found an explaination of how to float the disk. In Q-talk #1 there is an explaination on how to float the calipers. Which way do most of you prefer? If I want to go back to the smaller tires someday, is one way better than the other? Thanks! Doug "Hawkeye" Humble Omaha NE
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
Who is this?
Gascolator is bad. I hac the same problem 10yrs ago. Changed to car filter
inside cockpit like plans and never had any trouble since, dave carlson
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
Michael D. Callahan <micallahan@...>
150 hp out of a 2100 Revmaster? It'll take more than a cam, heads and
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
redrive to accomplish that. How fast are you planning on turning the engine, 7000? Has this setup been dynoed? Mike C.
----- Original Message -----
From: James Postma <james@...> To: <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Rough Revmaster build the complete car. Incidentally, all the parts cost $900. A little bettergood for 150 hp with a cam and redrive. Don't think it is a good idea or thatonly turning 3500 rpm. I plan to upgrade the cam and go to 4300 rpm if I canyou grind them when you say keep the seats narrow and to the outside edge ofthe valve face?adjust notvery getawareout-of-adjustment as often. >> ofseats.VW heads have used the same valve seat material from at least the early shouldIf you are using a valve seat cutter rather than a grinder, and you seatbe, the difference in material is obvious right away. Stock VW valve gasmaterial is just fine with unleaded fuel. I have not had to change ANYthan valvewith no problems. withadjustment for the break in period is whether the seats have been cut aover45 deg or a 46 deg cutter. I use a 46 deg cut and keep the seats narrowandto the outside edge of the valve face, and have had excellent results ofthe years. You can expect the valves to loosen for the first tank or 2 requirefuel (assuming fresh cam train components) and then close up again overthenext 100 hours or so. After that they should settle down and only tosmall adjustments. aaboutgood VW is in the heads - both for horsepower and reliability. Just any competent mechanic can screw together a VW block but to make a goodsetof heads requires an "artist".
|
|
I am baff-fold..
allen relseg
Hi & hope to see you all in kansas.. Now my problem, I can post to
this group with no problems.. Soooo why cant I post to the Airsoob group.. I am a member of both groups..Some of the Q-people are also on the Aairsoob group.. I have been working hard at finishing my Taylorbird, Subaru-powered, and have a few Eng. problems to work out.. It was certified by our gov. last week with (flying) colors. Now I can work on my Q-200 this winter. Plan is to have a local bop around plane and a cross country plane.. See ya at the big "Q" spot... Mark Lima,Oh "Does this mean were all groupys now"
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
Ted VanMeter <tvanmeter@...>
Just thought I would add my 2 cents worth. I know you are all running with
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
fuel pumps so this will sound a little off point, but it is something to think about. A high wing Cessna w/o a fuel pump ( as they are from the factory) on a hot Texas day is subject to vapor "lock". The problem is usually only noticed on landing if at all. The problem is more severe with auto fuel. A fuel pump and gascolator cooling are the cure. If the gascolator is near the exhaust it should be shielded and insulated. A regulator with a return line to the tank of your choice is also a good idea. Well there it is both pennies. Ted
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Finley <finley@...> To: Q-LIST@... <Q-LIST@...> Date: Monday, September 11, 2000 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [Q-LIST] Rough Revmaster (or the combination of several things) and worse, when it goes away you mayfuel related and they end up being electrical or vice versa (probably tellsknow!!). someone (may have been Sam?) mentioned that the fuel in the header tank gets prettyplacement. There is only one way that I know to accurately check this and that is tonext best is to run full throttle on the ground at a particular mixture settingthe plugs. Remember that a long idle with a very rich idle setting will taintfull >throttle wea level with the mixture slightly out ....... the criticalthe >exhaust leaked out. I was able to return to the field at low power andis, >has anyone had any trouble like this with the Revmaster? I've had toin it
|
|
Re: Rough Revmaster
Hot Wings
In a message dated 9/11/00 3:08:25 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
james@... writes: << Thanks for the advice on the valve grinding. I will include them in my specs at the next valve job. So the valves are higher that the seats as you grind them when you say keep the seats narrow and to the outside edge of the valve face? As to compression ratio, Revmaster says stay under 9:1 even with 100LL, which they recommend to use, so it is not a fuel issue as much as what the bottom end will take. >> ==================================== By narrow, I mean use the minimum specs from VW. I see many valve jobs with seat widths around 1.5 to 2 mm. Some think that a wide seat will transfer heat better and seal better but in practice, due to some other factors, what you would intuitively think would work - doesn't. I prefer that the valve contact area show up around the 50% to 75% radius on the valve face when checked with bluing. Not only does this remove the heat from the hottest part of the valve it helps to improve the flow a bit. On the subject of heat - a good valve job is much more important on an air cooled motor as the cylinder head temps are generally much higher and the heat transfer from the valve to the head is more critical. If you have any carbon build up on the valve face it acts like an insulating layer and you end up with a cascade type of failure. This is one reason for the narrow seat. There is more contact pressure and tends to be more self-cleaning. A loose valve clearance will also cause the same problem as the valve spends a little bit of time rattling into place each time rather than being "guided" into place. There is also a significant amount of heat passed through the valve stem and if the clearances are too great that transfer is reduced - and there is more oil film there to be turned into carbon from an overheated valve. On my ground bound VWs I usually use about half of the clearance specified by VW for a stock motor. In fact I have a hard time finding valve guides that are small enough even when new. It makes for dramatically increased valve life but I would not suggest this for an aircraft motor since they generally run a bit hotter and I have had 2 intake valves stick in the past 15 years due to the tight tolerances. 9 to one compression might be OK for 100LL or even auto gas if flown from high altitude strips only. If you want to run car gas, I would seriously consider a lower compression ratio. The VW factory lowered their compression ratio to 6.6 to 1 (IIRC) on the last versions of the bug motor imported here. Gene Berg (THE VW man) also recommended lower compression ratios and proved on his dyno that in mild states of tune (like our aircraft) you lost very little Hp and actually picked up a few ft.lbs of torque in the mid ranges. (again right where our direct drive VW run). I'll keep my opinions on anyone recommending 100LL in a VW to myself for now.......................if you can't say anything good...................... A couple of more tidbits of opinion: A stock VW lower is good for about 125 streetable Hp after which you start having significant reliability problems. 75 to 80 Hp is about the maximum you should expect to pull from a VW in an aircraft version in cruise due to heat build up unless you have VERY good cooling ducting/baffling. There are only so many BTU's that can be transferred from a finite fin area to the air. Any more Hp than this and you will need to rely on oil cooling more. "Think outside the box - but fly in the envelope" <A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/bd5er/Qpage.html">Q-2 page</A> Leon McAtee
|
|