Date
1 - 5 of 5
Potential Quckie Owner's questions -- correction
Mike Perry <dmperry1012@...>
Sorry, I wrote "over 40 mph with the VW engine or at slower speeds" but I
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
meant over 40 miles per gallon with the VW or at slower speeds. Mike Perry At 08:46 PM 8/26/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Hi Dave -- I once considered buying a Katana so I'll take a shot at this. |
|
attorneyadam@...
I've got about 10 hours in a katana and the only thing in common is the
differential braking... Quickie will challenge your guts, make you a better pilot, and either you'll love it or hate it! Flying a Q isn't the challenge, but taking off at much higher speeds and landing at mach 9 will give you a reason to go to church! Go fly with someone (more than once preferably) first, think it over, and make your decision... |
|
Robert Justin
I suggest you qualify in a Piper Tomahawk if you can find some one with a Q-2. It takes off and lands at 70 knots and is a good transition aircraft to use when moving in to a high performance aircraft.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Perry" <dmperry1012@...> To: <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 11:30 PM Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Potential Quckie Owner's questions -- correction Sorry, I wrote "over 40 mph with the VW engine or at slower speeds" but I |
|
Steve <sham@...>
Except fot the fact that the wheel is on the wrong end of the plane.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Steve Ham ----- Original Message -----
From: flywarrior To: Q-LIST@... Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 10:25 AM Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Potential Quckie Owner's questions -- correction I suggest you qualify in a Piper Tomahawk if you can find some one with a Q-2. It takes off and lands at 70 knots and is a good transition aircraft to use when moving in to a high performance aircraft. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Perry" <dmperry1012@...> To: <Q-LIST@...> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 11:30 PM Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] Potential Quckie Owner's questions -- correction > Sorry, I wrote "over 40 mph with the VW engine or at slower speeds" but I > meant over 40 miles per gallon with the VW or at slower speeds. > > Mike Perry > > At 08:46 PM 8/26/2005 -0700, you wrote: >>Hi Dave -- I once considered buying a Katana so I'll take a shot at this. >> >>You are talking about two totally different aircraft. The Katana is a >>trainer, flies safe, lands slow (about 50 knots on final). The Q2/Q200 is >>a hot rod. It flies safe but it lands very hot -- 75 knots or greater on >>final. The canard design makes it very safe, there is no stall of the >>main >>wing. It is very efficient, with guys getting 30+ miles per gallon, and >>over 40 mph with the VW engine or at slower speeds. >> >>Also: The Q family are all experimental/homebuilt. No two are >>alike. They require careful study of their idiosyncrasies, and you will >>have to be more involved in the maintenance. They can be wonderful >>airplanes, but they can also be dangerous (read the old newsletters about >>first flight fatalities). >> >>Perhaps the biggest difference is experimental vs. certified. If your >>experience is all in Cessna/Piper/Diamond trainers, you will find huge >>differences. I suggest you read "Spam Can or Homebuilt?" in the May 2005 >>Aviation Consumer. I don't agree with everything said in the article, but >>it will give you a good place to start from. >> >>If you are still interested in a Q2/Q200 I suggest you come to a fly-in or >>visit a builder before you go any further. >> >>Mike Perry >>(Still building) >> >> >>At 07:47 PM 8/26/2005 +0000, you wrote: >> >Good day, >> >I've been looking at a q2 or q200 as a quick, efficient way of getting >> >around. But before I dive in, I'd like to know so information and >> >some solid number from both by people who actually fly them. >> >How does it handle compared to a Katana? How does it stall? >> >Whats the normal cruise speed? (really, dont exaggerate) >> >Any tendency to spin? >> >What the GPH rate at Cruise speed? >> >How wide is the cabin? >> >I have a million questions, but ill start with these. >> >I've read all the quickie websites, but the numbers always vary. >> >Thanks again, >> >Dave Robins 4V >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Quickie Builders Association WEB site >><http://www.quickiebuilders.org>http://www.quickiebuilders.org >> >> >> >> >> >>---------- >>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS >> >> * Visit your group "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Q-LIST>Q-LIST" on >> the web. >> * >> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >> * >> <mailto:Q-LIST-unsubscribe@...?subject=Unsubscribe>Q-LIST-unsubscribe@... >> >> * >> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the >> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service. >> >> >>---------- > > > > > > > > > Quickie Builders Association WEB site > http://www.quickiebuilders.org > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Quickie Builders Association WEB site http://www.quickiebuilders.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS a.. Visit your group "Q-LIST" on the web. b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Q-LIST-unsubscribe@... c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
Steve,
Minor detail. You should know that you can fly any type airplane and then jump right in a Q200 and fly it! Shame on you! Jim P. N46JP Q200 --- In Q-LIST@..., "Steve" <sham@i...> wrote: Except fot the fact that the wheel is on the wrong end of theplane. correction one with a Q-2. It takes off and lands at 70 knots and is a good transitionaircraft to use when moving in to a high performance aircraft.correction speeds" but I > meant over 40 miles per gallon with the VW or at slower speeds.shot at this. >>Katana is a >>trainer, flies safe, lands slow (about 50 knots on final). TheQ2/Q200 is >>a hot rod. It flies safe but it lands very hot -- 75 knots orgreater on >>final. The canard design makes it very safe, there is no stallof the >>maingallon, and >>over 40 mph with the VW engine or at slower speeds.you will >>have to be more involved in the maintenance. They can bewonderful >>airplanes, but they can also be dangerous (read the oldnewsletters about >>first flight fatalities).If your >>experience is all in Cessna/Piper/Diamond trainers, you willfind huge >>differences. I suggest you read "Spam Can or Homebuilt?" inthe May 2005 >>Aviation Consumer. I don't agree with everything said in thearticle, but >>it will give you a good place to start from.a fly-in or >>visit a builder before you go any further.of getting >> >around. But before I dive in, I'd like to know soinformation and >> >some solid number from both by people who actually fly them.vary. >> >Thanks again,LIST>Q-LIST" on >> the web.subject=Unsubscribe>Q-LIST-unsubscribe@... >>---------- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKSof Service. ---------- |
|