Date
1 - 5 of 5
Potential new builder
Dennis Gentry
Hi,
I've been flying since the mid 80s, almost exclusively a Mooney 252 for the last 10 years. I've been interested in building a Quickie since I was a kid and saw the Popular Science article. Here's the tricky part. I'm 6' 8" and have weighed as much as 290 lbs so I'm not sure I'll fit in a Quickie. (I have always been pretty comfortable in our Mooney.) Is there anyone in the SF Bay Area (or an hour's Mooney 252 flight within the SF Bay Area, which gets me to Reno) who would be willing to let me try on their Q-200 or similar for size? One possible eventual use for a Quickie for me would be to commute a couple of days a week from an airpark in the Sierra foothills to the SF Bay Area. I could do that in the 252, but it's a tad expensive. The Quickies are some of the few A/C that are more efficient than Mooneys! I saw the August event in Livermore, but wasn't sure if it was going to happen this year. If it did and I haven't already missed it, it would be great to see a bunch of flying Quickies, even if I don't end up building one. Thanks, Dennis
|
|
Joseph M Snow <1flashq@...>
Hi Dennis,
The Q2/200 could easily handle your size as a single pilot. One option would be to leave out the center consolen and set up side stick controls. There are plans for dual side sticks which could be modified for a single side stick..You could utilize the original VW engine for economy. Or move up to the O-200 with extra fuel for a single seat screamer. Several other engine options are available..QAC did not recommend the Q2 as an IFR platform, but you would still have the Moony if you had to go in marginal weather. Cheers, Joseph Dennis Gentry <dennis.gentry@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I've been flying since the mid 80s, almost exclusively a Mooney 252 for the last 10 years. I've been interested in building a Quickie since I was a kid and saw the Popular Science article. Here's the tricky part. I'm 6' 8" and have weighed as much as 290 lbs so I'm not sure I'll fit in a Quickie. (I have always been pretty comfortable in our Mooney.) Is there anyone in the SF Bay Area (or an hour's Mooney 252 flight within the SF Bay Area, which gets me to Reno) who would be willing to let me try on their Q-200 or similar for size? One possible eventual use for a Quickie for me would be to commute a couple of days a week from an airpark in the Sierra foothills to the SF Bay Area. I could do that in the 252, but it's a tad expensive. The Quickies are some of the few A/C that are more efficient than Mooneys! I saw the August event in Livermore, but wasn't sure if it was going to happen this year. If it did and I haven't already missed it, it would be great to see a bunch of flying Quickies, even if I don't end up building one. Thanks, Dennis
|
|
wesisberg <wes@...>
Dennis,
There are pilots over 6'2" and over 200#'s, but the fit might not be that easy. Mine was set up for 6'2" pilot and I hit my 5'7" head/set on the canopy when I move forward 2" and reduce the seat cushion. I also have to set up the rudder pedals just right to avoid the bulkhead stiffeners. Weight-wise, most people have to economize as it is, so yeah you might give up on passengers; but a few familiarization flights as a passenger is considered mandatory before flying it yourself, and you might have more trouble finding someone to take you up. Finally, consider also building/maintaining. I'm 175# and have a hard time getting into the legwell to work on the rudder pedals, fuel system, panel connections, etc. (You can open the fuselage split to work on the battery and such.) Even if you get a panel that can be removed in its entirety, you have to work on plumbing. As for engines, I've only seen flying O-200's and a couple Revmasters, though Alan Thayer's Jabiru always seems almost ready to go. W&B would be easy to mess up in these planes. Your airpark would need a 3000+' long and 50-75' wide runway (low enough for hot summer afternoons?). That said, if you fly into LVK I can show you a couple planes (Sorry, no rides). Email me directly. Wes --- In Q-LIST@yahoogroups.com, Joseph M Snow <1flashq@...> wrote: option would be to leave out the center consolen and set up side stick controls. There are plans for dual side sticks which could be modified for a single side stick..You could utilize the original VW engine for economy. Or move up to the O-200 with extra fuel for a single seat screamer. Several other engine options are available..QAC did not recommend the Q2 as an IFR platform, but you would still have the Moony if you had to go in marginal weather. for the last 10 years. I've been interested in building a Quickie since Iwas a kid and saw the Popular Science article.comfortable in our Mooney.) Is there anyone in the SF Bay Area (or an hour'sMooney 252 flight within the SF Bay Area, which gets me to Reno) who would bewilling to let me try on their Q-200 or similar for size? One possibleeventual use for a Quickie for me would be to commute a couple of days a week from anin the 252, but it's a tad expensive. The Quickies are some of the few A/C that
|
|
Jerry Marstall <jnmarstall@...>
I can't see you being able to fly this plane in any form. I'm a 6'5",
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
200 lbs string bean and I had to make extensive changes to the fuselage and cockpit and still don't fit comfortably. My head is bent to the side, my knees are under my nose and feet pressed against the firewall. (Not a pretty sight) It simply isn't designed for tall people. Jerry Joseph M Snow wrote:
|
|
Larry Severson
I'm 175# and have aTry http:\\Slicky.org. It shows a Q2 mod with an instrument panel that gives lots of leg room, Neat idea. Larry Severson Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852 larry2@socal.rr.com
|
|