Date
1 - 16 of 16
LS1 Foam Layout. . .
quickheads
You've got to love QAC. . .
I have been working with a set of LS1 templates and trying to figure out how they get lined up on the ends of the foam blocks. The LS1 instructions say to use the same block sizes called out in the Q2 plans, but the angles generated don't really match the sweep of the LS1 canard. So how do you know where to place the templates horizontally on the blocks. Also, on page 3-6 of the Q2 plans it calls the "level Lines" drawn on the templates "Water Lines" does this mean that the "Level Lines" on the templates are placed at the same level vertically on the ends of the foam blocks as well as being "level"? Or is this just an artifact from the VariEZ plans that got copied and pasted into the Q2 plans? I'm guessing that you Q-200 (and Q1 LS1) guys had a lot of futzing around to do in order to get your cores to fit on the spars. Let me know how you did it! I appreciate your experience. Thanks, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com
|
|
Hey Dan,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In aircraft location Stations = distance from 0.0 (X) to item from nose to tail, Butt lines = Distance from centerline out toward wing tips (Y), Waterline = Distance in vertical from a known reference there is only one Waterline 0.0. All waterlines are level by definition (Z), All stations and butt lines are perpendicular to the waterline. 0,0,0 is where ever QAC decided and should be specified on the plan. Perfect cores are the start to a perfect wing. Regards, Charlie Johnson Ogden, Utah
In a message dated 7/7/2011 7:18:27 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
dan@... writes: Thanks for the response Sam, I appreciate it. Not sure if my original question made any sense though. ;-) I'll try again. "Level Lines" - to me this means that you level a template on one end of the foam block. (L.E. to T.E.) "Water Lines" - to me this means that two separate templates are at the same height on opposite ends of the foam block. I was just wondering if the "Level Lines" indicated on the templates, were also "Water Lines." (Or if it matters.) Does that make sense? Please let me know. Again, I'm guessing that you had to sand and futz with the cores to get them to all fit together properly. Thanks again, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:38:38 -0500, Sam Hoskins wrote: Dan - if I recall, you square the TE of the block and you line up the ------------------------------------ Quickie Builders Association WEB site http://www.quickiebuilders.org Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Dan - if I recall, you square the TE of the block and you line up the
templates with TE. That establishes the sweep for the LE. The lines on the templates must be level when you hot wire them and then must be accurately transferred to the foam after they have been cut out. Water lines/level lines, I believe we are talking about the same thing. Does this answer your questions? Sam On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:39 PM, <dan@...> wrote: ** [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
quickheads
Thanks for the response Sam, I appreciate it. Not sure if my original question made any sense though. ;-) I'll try again.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
"Level Lines" - to me this means that you level a template on one end of the foam block. (L.E. to T.E.) "Water Lines" - to me this means that two separate templates are at the same height on opposite ends of the foam block. I was just wondering if the "Level Lines" indicated on the templates, were also "Water Lines." (Or if it matters.) Does that make sense? Please let me know. Again, I'm guessing that you had to sand and futz with the cores to get them to all fit together properly. Thanks again, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:38:38 -0500, Sam Hoskins wrote:
Dan - if I recall, you square the TE of the block and you line up the
|
|
quickheads
Thanks Charlie,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I do understand all of that. My question is whether the template "level lines" need to be placed at the same distance verically above/below a predefined "water line" Let's say the table you are about to cut your foam cores on is level in all directions. You place one template on the end of the foam block with the "Level Line" say 5 inches off the table. On the other end of the foam block, do you need to put the other template's "Level Line" 5 inches off of the table? Or is there some other reference to align the templates vertically on the foam blocks? This is hard to describe without a picture, maybe I'll skectch something quickly if my question still doesn't make sense. Please let me know. I appreciate all of your input. Thanks guys, -Dan
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:46:57 EDT, oneskydog@... wrote:
Hey Dan,
|
|
quickheads
This is a response to Rick Hole's OFFLIST message (Show below). Rick if you send an e-mail to Q-LIST_at_yahoogroups_dot_com it will be posted to the Q-list automagically. ;-)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks Rick, The problem is that the LS1 plans aren't very precise. They seem to be an addendum to an addendum, with various references to the Q2 plans. The Q2 plans say that you line the T.E. of the templates to the Squared off foam block, but it also says that you can leave the trim lines dangling off the end of the foam if you want. So that leaves some wiggle room fore and aft. Then it doesn't really say how to align the templates vertically from end to end. Except an obscure reference to "Water Lines" in the Education Chapter (3). There are no offsets or exceptions listed on the templates, and no vertical dimensions given. Just a rough sketch of the GU canard templates tacked to the ends of the foam, with no precise locations given. If the templates cut the foam perpendicular to the wing, and then the wing is swept back, and anhedral is added, doesn't this change the shape of the airfoil to the relative wind (Along BL0). I know that the templates seem to have worked fine for many of you, and they resulted in several beautifully flying airplanes. I'm just wondering how people actually cut out their canards, and get my head wrapped around it. I'd like to write an article that makes the process a little more precise than shown in the "instructions." I appreciate your input. Thanks again, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:27:26 -0400, Rick Hole wrote:
Hi Dan,
|
|
Fisher Paul A. <fisherpaula@...>
Dan,
As I recall (it’s been 25+ years!), yes, you put the “waterlines” at the same height above the table on the foam block before you cut them. Basically that makes the ends of the foam perpendicular to the top and bottom skins. This lets you join the blocks together without a big gap to fill. I agree with Charlie’s comment about perfect cores, but don’t overdo it. A lot of us built wings long before digital levels and laser sighting devices. We measured with a ruler and checked level with a bubble in a tube. When you jig everything together, you’ll have to sand everything smooth. Do the absolute best you can, but with today’s tools, even a “poor job” is probably better than mine turned out – and I’ve been very happy with my results! I hope that helps. - Paul From: Q-LIST@... [mailto:Q-LIST@...] On Behalf Of dan@... Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 09:11 To: Q-LIST@... Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] LS1 Foam Layout. . . Thanks Charlie, I do understand all of that. My question is whether the template "level lines" need to be placed at the same distance verically above/below a predefined "water line" Let's say the table you are about to cut your foam cores on is level in all directions. You place one template on the end of the foam block with the "Level Line" say 5 inches off the table. On the other end of the foam block, do you need to put the other template's "Level Line" 5 inches off of the table? Or is there some other reference to align the templates vertically on the foam blocks? This is hard to describe without a picture, maybe I'll skectch something quickly if my question still doesn't make sense. Please let me know. I appreciate all of your input. Thanks guys, -Dan On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:46:57 EDT, oneskydog@...<mailto:oneskydog%40aol.com> wrote: Hey Dan,
|
|
quickheads
Thanks Paul,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That helps. Again I don't envy the work you guys put in to build these things without the support of "the initiated." You managed to build beautiful flying aircraft, and the rest of us appreciate your continued support. Thanks again, -Dan
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:19:24 -0500, Fisher Paul A. wrote:
Dan,
|
|
I think I get your meaning. Forget about the levelness of the table,
it's practically irrelevant. - Weigh the block down so it can't move. - Slap the template on one end of the block and make sure it's perfectly level. - Take your tubing with the water in it and use it make the opposite side template exactly the same as the first side. Okay? Sam On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:11 AM, <dan@...> wrote: ** [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Sam Kittle
Dan,
The height of the template level lines from the table should be the same. I recommend making two templates for the BL-100 elevator template. One oversized and the other to plans spec. Hotwire, using the oversized template and then use the plans spec template for sanding the core to the proper size. Give me a call if you need further information. Sam 209-785-2931 _____ From: Q-LIST@... [mailto:Q-LIST@...] On Behalf Of dan@... Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 7:11 AM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] LS1 Foam Layout. . . Thanks Charlie, I do understand all of that. My question is whether the template "level lines" need to be placed at the same distance verically above/below a predefined "water line" Let's say the table you are about to cut your foam cores on is level in all directions. You place one template on the end of the foam block with the "Level Line" say 5 inches off the table. On the other end of the foam block, do you need to put the other template's "Level Line" 5 inches off of the table? Or is there some other reference to align the templates vertically on the foam blocks? This is hard to describe without a picture, maybe I'll skectch something quickly if my question still doesn't make sense. Please let me know. I appreciate all of your input. Thanks guys, -Dan On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:46:57 EDT, oneskydog@... <mailto:oneskydog%40aol.com> wrote: Hey Dan,
|
|
Rick Hole
Yes, you are correct that the shape of the wing is altered doing this, but the core templates are shaped to compensate.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: dan@... [mailto:dan@...] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 10:51 AM To: r.hole@...; Q-LIST@... Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] LS1 Foam Layout. . . This is a response to Rick Hole's OFFLIST message (Show below). Rick if you send an e-mail to Q-LIST_at_yahoogroups_dot_com it will be posted to the Q-list automagically. ;-) Thanks Rick, The problem is that the LS1 plans aren't very precise. They seem to be an addendum to an addendum, with various references to the Q2 plans. The Q2 plans say that you line the T.E. of the templates to the Squared off foam block, but it also says that you can leave the trim lines dangling off the end of the foam if you want. So that leaves some wiggle room fore and aft. Then it doesn't really say how to align the templates vertically from end to end. Except an obscure reference to "Water Lines" in the Education Chapter (3). There are no offsets or exceptions listed on the templates, and no vertical dimensions given. Just a rough sketch of the GU canard templates tacked to the ends of the foam, with no precise locations given. If the templates cut the foam perpendicular to the wing, and then the wing is swept back, and anhedral is added, doesn't this change the shape of the airfoil to the relative wind (Along BL0). I know that the templates seem to have worked fine for many of you, and they resulted in several beautifully flying airplanes. I'm just wondering how people actually cut out their canards, and get my head wrapped around it. I'd like to write an article that makes the process a little more precise than shown in the "instructions." I appreciate your input. Thanks again, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:27:26 -0400, Rick Hole wrote: Hi Dan,
|
|
Rick Hole
As far as the note that you can line up the eventual trim lines at the edge of the block, you have the option to do that, but you must do the same at both ends of the foam block. I'd use the whole template unless there is no extra foam for the whole thing.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Rick Hole
-----Original Message-----
From: dan@... [mailto:dan@...] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 10:51 AM To: r.hole@...; Q-LIST@... Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] LS1 Foam Layout. . . This is a response to Rick Hole's OFFLIST message (Show below). Rick if you send an e-mail to Q-LIST_at_yahoogroups_dot_com it will be posted to the Q-list automagically. ;-) Thanks Rick, The problem is that the LS1 plans aren't very precise. They seem to be an addendum to an addendum, with various references to the Q2 plans. The Q2 plans say that you line the T.E. of the templates to the Squared off foam block, but it also says that you can leave the trim lines dangling off the end of the foam if you want. So that leaves some wiggle room fore and aft. Then it doesn't really say how to align the templates vertically from end to end. Except an obscure reference to "Water Lines" in the Education Chapter (3). There are no offsets or exceptions listed on the templates, and no vertical dimensions given. Just a rough sketch of the GU canard templates tacked to the ends of the foam, with no precise locations given. If the templates cut the foam perpendicular to the wing, and then the wing is swept back, and anhedral is added, doesn't this change the shape of the airfoil to the relative wind (Along BL0). I know that the templates seem to have worked fine for many of you, and they resulted in several beautifully flying airplanes. I'm just wondering how people actually cut out their canards, and get my head wrapped around it. I'd like to write an article that makes the process a little more precise than shown in the "instructions." I appreciate your input. Thanks again, Dan Yager QBA Editor www.quickheads.com On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:27:26 -0400, Rick Hole wrote: Hi Dan,
|
|
Rick Hole
I would not agree. If the table is not level the cut ends will not be
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
square with the bottom edge and you will have to do some extra work to line up the cores on the jigging fixture. Take a couple minutes and level the table. Rick Hole N1711Q Radio test OK. Fresh air vents hooked up. ELT installed.
-----Original Message-----
From: Q-LIST@... [mailto:Q-LIST@...] On Behalf Of Sam Hoskins Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 11:47 AM To: Q-LIST@... Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] LS1 Foam Layout. . . I think I get your meaning. Forget about the levelness of the table, it's practically irrelevant. - Weigh the block down so it can't move. - Slap the template on one end of the block and make sure it's perfectly level. - Take your tubing with the water in it and use it make the opposite side template exactly the same as the first side. Okay? Sam
|
|
Fisher Paul A. <fisherpaula@...>
One other technique I used was to "skin" all of the foam blocks before cutting the cores out. The hard finish on the exterior of the blocks would cause issues getting the hot wire in and out, and as I recall some folks had the blocks change shape when the outside edges were taken off. Relieving the internal stress first kept the cores straighter. I always started with squared up blocks. Then as Sam says, the level of the table is practically irrelevant...
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
- Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Q-LIST@... [mailto:Q-LIST@...] On Behalf Of Sam Hoskins Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 10:47 To: Q-LIST@... Subject: Re: [Q-LIST] LS1 Foam Layout. . . I think I get your meaning. Forget about the levelness of the table, it's practically irrelevant. - Weigh the block down so it can't move. - Slap the template on one end of the block and make sure it's perfectly level. - Take your tubing with the water in it and use it make the opposite side template exactly the same as the first side. Okay? Sam On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:11 AM, <dan@...> wrote: ** [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Quickie Builders Association WEB site http://www.quickiebuilders.org Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Actually, when you really think about, skinning the cores does nothing.
JMHO. If skinning were to actually help, the inside of the foam would have to move - to settle into a new position. I just don't think that really happens. Have we confused you enough, Dan? Sam On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Fisher Paul A. <fisherpaula@...>wrote: ** [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
quickheads
Nope. . . It all actually helped. (I think.) ;-)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks guys, -Dan
Have we confused you enough, Dan?
|
|