FW: FAA Issues General Aviation Medical Rule
Jerry Marstall <jnmarstall@...>
Did everyone see this? J
From: Federal Aviation Administration [mailto:usafaa@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:03 AM To: jnmarstall@... Subject: FAA Issues General Aviation Medical Rule
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
The biggest problem this poses is if you decide to continue with the old method of a bi annual medical, there will be no more FAA AME's in the area. We already are strapped in this area, as all of the AME's are retired or passed away. May be that the only possibility is to drive long distances or go with the new system. I am due at the end of January, and I still have not found anyone to do the exam.
Cheers, Jay |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Interesting... we got an excess of AME's here in Florida, probably 10 within a 20 min drive. I don't think they will go away because they also do occupational medicine like truck drivers... $150 when I went a few months ago tho. Mike N3QP Q200 On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:10 PM, jay@... [Q-LIST] <Q-LIST@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
ryan goodman
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Tristan Vincent-Philpot <trisvp@...>
18,000ft and 250 Kts IAS.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Guess I better stick with the standard medical, since my Tri-Q will easily exceed those numbers :-)
Seriously, the most significant restriction that I think may be of concern to the Q-crowd with the new medical is that it limits flight to within the Continental U.S. So anyone thinking of flying to Canada, Mexico, Bermuda, etc. will not be allowed to do so. There also may be insurance implications. We have not heard much from insurance providers on whether there may be a two tiered rate for the two paths of medical certification. Cheers, Jay |
||||||||||||||
|